改变易卜生的光环:乔恩·福斯的苏珊娜

Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740
Kyle Korynta
{"title":"改变易卜生的光环:乔恩·福斯的苏珊娜","authors":"Kyle Korynta","doi":"10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In anticipation of Ibsenåret 2006, the Ibsen Year, Jon Fosse wrote a drama on the private life of “the father of modern drama” and his wife. Suzannah, written in 2003, is based on the known historical information about the private lives of the Ibsens; yet since much of this knowledge was lost when Suzannah burned their personal correspondence after Ibsen’s death, Fosse fills in the gaps of historical information with possible scenarios. Instead of taking the form of a modernist crime-fiction novel in which the suspect is unknown, Suzannah is a postmodernist “anti-crime” drama since we immediately know who committed the “crime” and we search for something that cannot be found or “solved”: the contents of the letters and the reasons why she burned them. Fosse presents the history of Ibsen, an influential modern playwright, in a postmodernist way; Ibsen never appears on stage and Suzannah is fragmented into three characters, each of which represents a different stage in the Ibsens’ life together. Fosse’s three Suzannahs serve as mouthpieces for Fosse to comment on and critique the Ibsens’ private life. In addition, Fosse alters Ibsen’s retrospective technique by having the Suzannahs narrate their experiences in present time as opposed to recalling their memories. The Suzannahs’ overlapping narration creates an overall experience of clues being reported at the scene of a crime or in cultural archives. Fosse’s fictitious account of the Ibsens’ private life shows a juxtaposition of, and a clash between, historical “fact” and fictional story. This approach allows Fosse to replace a totalizing modernist presentation of the Ibsens’ history with a fragmented postmodernist one, an approach that seeks to alter the traditional","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altering Henrik Ibsen’s Aura: Jon Fosse’s Suzannah\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Korynta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In anticipation of Ibsenåret 2006, the Ibsen Year, Jon Fosse wrote a drama on the private life of “the father of modern drama” and his wife. Suzannah, written in 2003, is based on the known historical information about the private lives of the Ibsens; yet since much of this knowledge was lost when Suzannah burned their personal correspondence after Ibsen’s death, Fosse fills in the gaps of historical information with possible scenarios. Instead of taking the form of a modernist crime-fiction novel in which the suspect is unknown, Suzannah is a postmodernist “anti-crime” drama since we immediately know who committed the “crime” and we search for something that cannot be found or “solved”: the contents of the letters and the reasons why she burned them. Fosse presents the history of Ibsen, an influential modern playwright, in a postmodernist way; Ibsen never appears on stage and Suzannah is fragmented into three characters, each of which represents a different stage in the Ibsens’ life together. Fosse’s three Suzannahs serve as mouthpieces for Fosse to comment on and critique the Ibsens’ private life. In addition, Fosse alters Ibsen’s retrospective technique by having the Suzannahs narrate their experiences in present time as opposed to recalling their memories. The Suzannahs’ overlapping narration creates an overall experience of clues being reported at the scene of a crime or in cultural archives. Fosse’s fictitious account of the Ibsens’ private life shows a juxtaposition of, and a clash between, historical “fact” and fictional story. This approach allows Fosse to replace a totalizing modernist presentation of the Ibsens’ history with a fragmented postmodernist one, an approach that seeks to alter the traditional\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1251740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在2006年易卜生年即将到来之际,乔恩·福斯写了一部关于“现代戏剧之父”和他妻子私生活的戏剧。《苏珊娜》写于2003年,是根据易卜生一家私人生活的已知历史信息写成的;然而,由于苏珊娜在易卜生死后烧毁了他们的私人信件,因此大部分信息都丢失了,福西用可能的场景填补了历史信息的空白。《苏珊娜》是一部后现代主义的“反犯罪”剧,而不是采用现代主义犯罪小说的形式,其中的嫌疑人是未知的,因为我们立即知道是谁犯下了“罪行”,我们寻找一些无法找到或“解决”的东西:信件的内容以及她烧毁信件的原因。福西以后现代主义的视角呈现了现代著名剧作家易卜生的历史;易卜生从未出现在舞台上,苏珊娜被分成三个角色,每个角色都代表了易卜生夫妇共同生活的不同阶段。福斯的三个苏珊娜充当了福斯评论和批评易卜生私人生活的喉舌。此外,福斯改变了易卜生的回顾技巧,让苏珊娜讲述她们在当下的经历,而不是回忆她们的记忆。苏珊娜姐妹重叠的叙述创造了一种在犯罪现场或文化档案中被报道的线索的整体体验。福西对易卜生私人生活的虚构描述显示了历史“事实”与虚构故事之间的并置和冲突。这种方法允许福斯用碎片化的后现代主义取代易卜生历史的整体现代主义呈现,这是一种寻求改变传统的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Altering Henrik Ibsen’s Aura: Jon Fosse’s Suzannah
In anticipation of Ibsenåret 2006, the Ibsen Year, Jon Fosse wrote a drama on the private life of “the father of modern drama” and his wife. Suzannah, written in 2003, is based on the known historical information about the private lives of the Ibsens; yet since much of this knowledge was lost when Suzannah burned their personal correspondence after Ibsen’s death, Fosse fills in the gaps of historical information with possible scenarios. Instead of taking the form of a modernist crime-fiction novel in which the suspect is unknown, Suzannah is a postmodernist “anti-crime” drama since we immediately know who committed the “crime” and we search for something that cannot be found or “solved”: the contents of the letters and the reasons why she burned them. Fosse presents the history of Ibsen, an influential modern playwright, in a postmodernist way; Ibsen never appears on stage and Suzannah is fragmented into three characters, each of which represents a different stage in the Ibsens’ life together. Fosse’s three Suzannahs serve as mouthpieces for Fosse to comment on and critique the Ibsens’ private life. In addition, Fosse alters Ibsen’s retrospective technique by having the Suzannahs narrate their experiences in present time as opposed to recalling their memories. The Suzannahs’ overlapping narration creates an overall experience of clues being reported at the scene of a crime or in cultural archives. Fosse’s fictitious account of the Ibsens’ private life shows a juxtaposition of, and a clash between, historical “fact” and fictional story. This approach allows Fosse to replace a totalizing modernist presentation of the Ibsens’ history with a fragmented postmodernist one, an approach that seeks to alter the traditional
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信