{"title":"死唤醒?易卜生在当代佛兰德戏剧创作中的实证研究","authors":"Daan Vandenhaute","doi":"10.1080/15021866.2016.1180868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1880 the Stadsschouwburg Amsterdam put on Pillars of Society, the first time Henrik Ibsen was staged in Dutch. Ever since Ibsen has been part of theater life in the Low Countries. As Rob van der Zalm has shown in his standard study on the reception of Ibsen in the Netherlands, the extent of this presence has fluctuated over time. After a tentative start, an introductory decade (1880–1890) was followed by a period of 40 years during which the number of productions were about 20 per decade. From 1930 until 1970 the number of productions decreased drastically, to less than then 10 per decade, but from 1970 onward the interest for Ibsen increased manifestly again. Van der Zalm notes that by the time he ends his investigation, 1995, 26 productions of Ibsen had already been staged, as many as during the entire 1980s. In a brief follow-up study published in the wake of the 2006 Ibsen anniversary van der Zalm observes that “(b) etween 1991 and 2000 the number of Ibsen productions reached the astonishing figure of forty, which means an average of four every season” (Van der Zalm 2007, 118). Van der Zalm’s data refer to the staging of Ibsen in the Netherlands. A similar rigorous investigation of the situation in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium, is unfortunately not available. This article aims to contribute to our understanding of the reception of Ibsen in contemporary Flanders. To this end, I develop a double perspective: on the one hand, I focus on the production side, studying how often Ibsen – and which Ibsen – has been staged in Flanders since 1985; on the other hand, I examine Ibsen’s status for contem-","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180868","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dead Awaken? An empirical study of Ibsen’s presence in contemporary Flemish theater\",\"authors\":\"Daan Vandenhaute\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021866.2016.1180868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1880 the Stadsschouwburg Amsterdam put on Pillars of Society, the first time Henrik Ibsen was staged in Dutch. Ever since Ibsen has been part of theater life in the Low Countries. As Rob van der Zalm has shown in his standard study on the reception of Ibsen in the Netherlands, the extent of this presence has fluctuated over time. After a tentative start, an introductory decade (1880–1890) was followed by a period of 40 years during which the number of productions were about 20 per decade. From 1930 until 1970 the number of productions decreased drastically, to less than then 10 per decade, but from 1970 onward the interest for Ibsen increased manifestly again. Van der Zalm notes that by the time he ends his investigation, 1995, 26 productions of Ibsen had already been staged, as many as during the entire 1980s. In a brief follow-up study published in the wake of the 2006 Ibsen anniversary van der Zalm observes that “(b) etween 1991 and 2000 the number of Ibsen productions reached the astonishing figure of forty, which means an average of four every season” (Van der Zalm 2007, 118). Van der Zalm’s data refer to the staging of Ibsen in the Netherlands. A similar rigorous investigation of the situation in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium, is unfortunately not available. This article aims to contribute to our understanding of the reception of Ibsen in contemporary Flanders. To this end, I develop a double perspective: on the one hand, I focus on the production side, studying how often Ibsen – and which Ibsen – has been staged in Flanders since 1985; on the other hand, I examine Ibsen’s status for contem-\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180868\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021866.2016.1180868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1880年,阿姆斯特丹城市剧院上演了《社会的支柱》,这是第一次在荷兰上演易卜生的作品。从那时起,易卜生就一直是低地国家戏剧生活的一部分。正如Rob van der Zalm在他关于易卜生在荷兰的接受程度的标准研究中所显示的那样,这种存在的程度随着时间的推移而波动。在试探性的开始之后,一个介绍性的十年(1880-1890)之后是40年的时间,在此期间,每十年的作品数量约为20部。从1930年到1970年,易卜生的作品数量急剧下降,每十年不到10部,但从1970年开始,对易卜生的兴趣又明显增加了。范德扎姆指出,到1995年他结束调查的时候,易卜生的作品已经上演了26部,与整个20世纪80年代的作品一样多。在2006年易卜生周年纪念之后发表的一项简短的后续研究中,van der Zalm观察到“(b)在1991年至2000年之间,易卜生作品的数量达到了惊人的40部,这意味着平均每季有4部”(van der Zalm 2007, 118)。Van der Zalm的数据参考了易卜生在荷兰的演出阶段。不幸的是,没有对比利时讲荷兰语的佛兰德斯地区的情况进行类似的严格调查。本文旨在帮助我们理解易卜生在当代佛兰德斯的接受。为此,我发展了一个双重视角:一方面,我专注于生产方面,研究易卜生自1985年以来在佛兰德斯上演的频率和哪位易卜生;另一方面,我考察了易卜生的当代地位
Dead Awaken? An empirical study of Ibsen’s presence in contemporary Flemish theater
In 1880 the Stadsschouwburg Amsterdam put on Pillars of Society, the first time Henrik Ibsen was staged in Dutch. Ever since Ibsen has been part of theater life in the Low Countries. As Rob van der Zalm has shown in his standard study on the reception of Ibsen in the Netherlands, the extent of this presence has fluctuated over time. After a tentative start, an introductory decade (1880–1890) was followed by a period of 40 years during which the number of productions were about 20 per decade. From 1930 until 1970 the number of productions decreased drastically, to less than then 10 per decade, but from 1970 onward the interest for Ibsen increased manifestly again. Van der Zalm notes that by the time he ends his investigation, 1995, 26 productions of Ibsen had already been staged, as many as during the entire 1980s. In a brief follow-up study published in the wake of the 2006 Ibsen anniversary van der Zalm observes that “(b) etween 1991 and 2000 the number of Ibsen productions reached the astonishing figure of forty, which means an average of four every season” (Van der Zalm 2007, 118). Van der Zalm’s data refer to the staging of Ibsen in the Netherlands. A similar rigorous investigation of the situation in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium, is unfortunately not available. This article aims to contribute to our understanding of the reception of Ibsen in contemporary Flanders. To this end, I develop a double perspective: on the one hand, I focus on the production side, studying how often Ibsen – and which Ibsen – has been staged in Flanders since 1985; on the other hand, I examine Ibsen’s status for contem-