是什么决定了获得中等安全的精神科服务

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Adrian Grounds Dm FRCPsych, Tom Fryers Md PhD Ffphm Visiting
{"title":"是什么决定了获得中等安全的精神科服务","authors":"Adrian Grounds Dm FRCPsych, Tom Fryers Md PhD Ffphm Visiting","doi":"10.1080/14789940410001661810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medium secure units sit in the middle of a spectrum of forensic inpatient care, called upon both by those leaving maximum security and those testing the limits of local admission. Defining middles is never easy and 3 decades after the development of these units there is still little consensus on precisely what criteria should decide the need for admission, and limited information on what factors operate in practice. Clarity could make admission assessment a more predictable process than it currently is and could even underpin a more rational policy development for forensic psychiatric care. Perhaps with this in mind, in 1998 the Department of Health commissioned two national studies of admission to, and discharge from, medium secure psychiatric care in England and Wales. This issue of the Journal contains a series of three papers describing the study of admission. The initial research brief had ambitious aims. It specified that the study should include samples of referrals to medium secure psychiatric services; a comparison of different areas and models of service provision; generalisable data on who gains access to medium secure care and who does not; an analysis of the determinants of selection; an examination of decision making The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","PeriodicalId":47524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14789940410001661810","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What determines access to medium secure psychiatric provision\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Grounds Dm FRCPsych, Tom Fryers Md PhD Ffphm Visiting\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14789940410001661810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medium secure units sit in the middle of a spectrum of forensic inpatient care, called upon both by those leaving maximum security and those testing the limits of local admission. Defining middles is never easy and 3 decades after the development of these units there is still little consensus on precisely what criteria should decide the need for admission, and limited information on what factors operate in practice. Clarity could make admission assessment a more predictable process than it currently is and could even underpin a more rational policy development for forensic psychiatric care. Perhaps with this in mind, in 1998 the Department of Health commissioned two national studies of admission to, and discharge from, medium secure psychiatric care in England and Wales. This issue of the Journal contains a series of three papers describing the study of admission. The initial research brief had ambitious aims. It specified that the study should include samples of referrals to medium secure psychiatric services; a comparison of different areas and models of service provision; generalisable data on who gains access to medium secure care and who does not; an analysis of the determinants of selection; an examination of decision making The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"PeriodicalId\":47524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14789940410001661810\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940410001661810\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940410001661810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What determines access to medium secure psychiatric provision
Medium secure units sit in the middle of a spectrum of forensic inpatient care, called upon both by those leaving maximum security and those testing the limits of local admission. Defining middles is never easy and 3 decades after the development of these units there is still little consensus on precisely what criteria should decide the need for admission, and limited information on what factors operate in practice. Clarity could make admission assessment a more predictable process than it currently is and could even underpin a more rational policy development for forensic psychiatric care. Perhaps with this in mind, in 1998 the Department of Health commissioned two national studies of admission to, and discharge from, medium secure psychiatric care in England and Wales. This issue of the Journal contains a series of three papers describing the study of admission. The initial research brief had ambitious aims. It specified that the study should include samples of referrals to medium secure psychiatric services; a comparison of different areas and models of service provision; generalisable data on who gains access to medium secure care and who does not; an analysis of the determinants of selection; an examination of decision making The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信