重新思考非洲环境中的以人为本和生态可持续性:来自卢甘达民间故事的见解

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
Eve Nabulya
{"title":"重新思考非洲环境中的以人为本和生态可持续性:来自卢甘达民间故事的见解","authors":"Eve Nabulya","doi":"10.1080/13696815.2022.2032618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reflects on an alternative mode of anthropocentrism emergent from representations of human–nonhuman relations in a selection of Ganda folktales. In particular, it addresses some major claims against anthropocentrism: the failure to recognise the importance of holism; the overlooking of the intrinsic value of nonhuman elements; and the undue emphasis on the ontological divide between humans and other entities. The article is based on a descriptive qualitative study utilising data from folktales as repositories of both the ancient and experiential wisdom of the Baganda. It focuses on five carefully selected stories, recorded during live performances in Mpigi District of Uganda in 2019, on the theme of human–nonhuman relations. The article argues that while the Ganda folktales selected in this study would generally be considered as advancing anthropocentrism, they exhibit a commitment to environmental sustainability in ways that interrogate the anthropocentrism–ecocentrism dichotomy. Through a blend of thematic and structural narrative analysis of the folktales, the study reveals that a communitarian social setup could promote a balanced stance in human relations with the nonhuman. This study, thus, challenges the blanket disparagement of anthropocentrism in contemporary environmental scholarship.","PeriodicalId":45196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Cultural Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"308 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Human-Centredness and Eco-Sustainability in an African Setting: Insights from Luganda Folktales\",\"authors\":\"Eve Nabulya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696815.2022.2032618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article reflects on an alternative mode of anthropocentrism emergent from representations of human–nonhuman relations in a selection of Ganda folktales. In particular, it addresses some major claims against anthropocentrism: the failure to recognise the importance of holism; the overlooking of the intrinsic value of nonhuman elements; and the undue emphasis on the ontological divide between humans and other entities. The article is based on a descriptive qualitative study utilising data from folktales as repositories of both the ancient and experiential wisdom of the Baganda. It focuses on five carefully selected stories, recorded during live performances in Mpigi District of Uganda in 2019, on the theme of human–nonhuman relations. The article argues that while the Ganda folktales selected in this study would generally be considered as advancing anthropocentrism, they exhibit a commitment to environmental sustainability in ways that interrogate the anthropocentrism–ecocentrism dichotomy. Through a blend of thematic and structural narrative analysis of the folktales, the study reveals that a communitarian social setup could promote a balanced stance in human relations with the nonhuman. This study, thus, challenges the blanket disparagement of anthropocentrism in contemporary environmental scholarship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"308 - 324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2022.2032618\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2022.2032618","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:本文反映了一种人类中心主义的替代模式,这种模式是从一组甘达民间故事中对人类与非人类关系的表现中产生的。特别是,它解决了一些反对人类中心主义的主要主张:未能认识到整体论的重要性;对非人因素内在价值的忽视;以及过分强调人类和其他实体之间的本体论分歧。本文基于一项描述性定性研究,利用民间故事中的数据作为巴干达人古老智慧和经验智慧的资料库。它侧重于2019年在乌干达Mpigi地区的现场表演中精心挑选的五个故事,主题是人与非人的关系。文章认为,虽然本研究中选择的甘达民间故事通常被认为是推进人类中心主义,但它们以质疑人类中心主义-生态中心主义二分法的方式表现出对环境可持续性的承诺。通过对民间故事的主题叙事与结构叙事相结合的分析,揭示了社群主义的社会结构能够促进人与非人关系的平衡。因此,这项研究挑战了当代环境学术对人类中心主义的全面贬低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking Human-Centredness and Eco-Sustainability in an African Setting: Insights from Luganda Folktales
ABSTRACT This article reflects on an alternative mode of anthropocentrism emergent from representations of human–nonhuman relations in a selection of Ganda folktales. In particular, it addresses some major claims against anthropocentrism: the failure to recognise the importance of holism; the overlooking of the intrinsic value of nonhuman elements; and the undue emphasis on the ontological divide between humans and other entities. The article is based on a descriptive qualitative study utilising data from folktales as repositories of both the ancient and experiential wisdom of the Baganda. It focuses on five carefully selected stories, recorded during live performances in Mpigi District of Uganda in 2019, on the theme of human–nonhuman relations. The article argues that while the Ganda folktales selected in this study would generally be considered as advancing anthropocentrism, they exhibit a commitment to environmental sustainability in ways that interrogate the anthropocentrism–ecocentrism dichotomy. Through a blend of thematic and structural narrative analysis of the folktales, the study reveals that a communitarian social setup could promote a balanced stance in human relations with the nonhuman. This study, thus, challenges the blanket disparagement of anthropocentrism in contemporary environmental scholarship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of African Cultural Studies publishes leading scholarship on African culture from inside and outside Africa, with a special commitment to Africa-based authors and to African languages. Our editorial policy encourages an interdisciplinary approach, involving humanities, including environmental humanities. The journal focuses on dimensions of African culture, performance arts, visual arts, music, cinema, the role of the media, the relationship between culture and power, as well as issues within such fields as popular culture in Africa, sociolinguistic topics of cultural interest, and culture and gender. We welcome in particular articles that show evidence of understanding life on the ground, and that demonstrate local knowledge and linguistic competence. We do not publish articles that offer mostly textual analyses of cultural products like novels and films, nor articles that are mostly historical or those based primarily on secondary (such as digital and library) sources. The journal has evolved from the journal African Languages and Cultures, founded in 1988 in the Department of the Languages and Cultures of Africa at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London. From 2019, it is published in association with the International African Institute, London. Journal of African Cultural Studies publishes original research articles. The journal also publishes an occasional Contemporary Conversations section, in which authors respond to current issues. The section has included reviews, interviews and invited response or position papers. We welcome proposals for future Contemporary Conversations themes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信