辅助生殖技术媒体立场的碰撞

Russian Education and Society Pub Date : 2016-08-02 DOI:10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380

T. Emelyanova, I. Vopilova

{"title":"辅助生殖技术媒体立场的碰撞","authors":"T. Emelyanova, I. Vopilova","doi":"10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analysis of the discourse on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) indicates the predominance of conservative representations of the family. The appearance of new technologies does not change the image of a “normal” family, because concepts connected with surrogate mothers and egg donors are minimally present in the discourse. In this case, there are contradictory points of view in interpretations of the moral permissibility of assisted reproductive technologies from the perspective of demography, sociology, orthodoxy, and medicine.","PeriodicalId":53668,"journal":{"name":"Russian Education and Society","volume":"58 1","pages":"576 - 589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collision of Media Positions on Assisted Reproductive Technologies\",\"authors\":\"T. Emelyanova, I. Vopilova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An analysis of the discourse on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) indicates the predominance of conservative representations of the family. The appearance of new technologies does not change the image of a “normal” family, because concepts connected with surrogate mothers and egg donors are minimally present in the discourse. In this case, there are contradictory points of view in interpretations of the moral permissibility of assisted reproductive technologies from the perspective of demography, sociology, orthodoxy, and medicine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"576 - 589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2016.1298380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对辅助生殖技术(ART)话语的分析表明，保守的家庭代表占主导地位。新技术的出现并没有改变“正常”家庭的形象，因为与代孕母亲和卵子捐赠者有关的概念在讨论中很少出现。在这种情况下，从人口学、社会学、正统和医学的角度对辅助生殖技术的道德容忍度的解释存在矛盾的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Collision of Media Positions on Assisted Reproductive Technologies

An analysis of the discourse on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) indicates the predominance of conservative representations of the family. The appearance of new technologies does not change the image of a “normal” family, because concepts connected with surrogate mothers and egg donors are minimally present in the discourse. In this case, there are contradictory points of view in interpretations of the moral permissibility of assisted reproductive technologies from the perspective of demography, sociology, orthodoxy, and medicine.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Russian Education and Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The editor of Russian Education and Society selects material for translation from the Russian-language professional literature on education and socialization. The materials surveyed cover preschool, primary, secondary, vocational, and higher education; curricula and methods; and socialization issues related to family life, ethnic and religious identity formation, youth culture, addiction and other behavioral and health problems; professional training and employment. The scope of the journal extends beyond Russia proper to provide coverage of all the former Soviet states as well as international educational issues.