苏联对华政策:1949-1969年发展核武器

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Viktor M. Gobarev
{"title":"苏联对华政策:1949-1969年发展核武器","authors":"Viktor M. Gobarev","doi":"10.1080/13518049908430415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 1999 has seen increasingly heated debates regarding the issue of alleged Chinese nuclear espionage in the United States. These debates focus on the issue of whether the Chinese simply outsmarted the US government, or whether the Clinton administration or its representatives deliberately leaked classified information on nuclear weapons and missile technology to the Chinese government or its agents. As context, it may be both timely and useful to examine what history has to tell us about such cases in the past. If this is so, then no case has been more extensive, appropriate, and illustrative of this process than the one involving Chinese‐Soviet nuclear cooperation, which extended from the end of the 1940s to the early 1960s. If this case is apropos, then the central questions are, ‘What nuclear secrets, if any, did the Chinese steal from the Soviets?’ and ‘What secrets, if any, did the Soviet Union itself transfer to China?’ These and other relevant issues are the central focus of this article.","PeriodicalId":35160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Military Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13518049908430415","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soviet policy toward China: Developing nuclear weapons 1949–1969\",\"authors\":\"Viktor M. Gobarev\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13518049908430415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 1999 has seen increasingly heated debates regarding the issue of alleged Chinese nuclear espionage in the United States. These debates focus on the issue of whether the Chinese simply outsmarted the US government, or whether the Clinton administration or its representatives deliberately leaked classified information on nuclear weapons and missile technology to the Chinese government or its agents. As context, it may be both timely and useful to examine what history has to tell us about such cases in the past. If this is so, then no case has been more extensive, appropriate, and illustrative of this process than the one involving Chinese‐Soviet nuclear cooperation, which extended from the end of the 1940s to the early 1960s. If this case is apropos, then the central questions are, ‘What nuclear secrets, if any, did the Chinese steal from the Soviets?’ and ‘What secrets, if any, did the Soviet Union itself transfer to China?’ These and other relevant issues are the central focus of this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Slavic Military Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13518049908430415\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Slavic Military Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13518049908430415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Slavic Military Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13518049908430415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

1999年,关于中国涉嫌在美国从事核间谍活动的争论日益激烈。这些争论集中在中国是否仅仅比美国政府聪明,或者克林顿政府或其代表是否故意向中国政府或其代理人泄露有关核武器和导弹技术的机密信息。作为背景,研究历史告诉我们的关于过去此类事件的信息可能既及时又有用。如果是这样的话,那么没有比中苏核合作更广泛、更恰当、更能说明这一过程的案例了,中苏核合作从20世纪40年代末一直延续到60年代初。如果这种情况是恰当的,那么核心问题是,“如果有的话,中国从苏联窃取了哪些核机密?”以及“苏联自己向中国转移了什么秘密(如果有的话)?”这些和其他相关问题是本文的中心焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soviet policy toward China: Developing nuclear weapons 1949–1969
The year 1999 has seen increasingly heated debates regarding the issue of alleged Chinese nuclear espionage in the United States. These debates focus on the issue of whether the Chinese simply outsmarted the US government, or whether the Clinton administration or its representatives deliberately leaked classified information on nuclear weapons and missile technology to the Chinese government or its agents. As context, it may be both timely and useful to examine what history has to tell us about such cases in the past. If this is so, then no case has been more extensive, appropriate, and illustrative of this process than the one involving Chinese‐Soviet nuclear cooperation, which extended from the end of the 1940s to the early 1960s. If this case is apropos, then the central questions are, ‘What nuclear secrets, if any, did the Chinese steal from the Soviets?’ and ‘What secrets, if any, did the Soviet Union itself transfer to China?’ These and other relevant issues are the central focus of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Slavic Military Studies
Journal of Slavic Military Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信