审查作为烟草香烟替代品的电子香烟:其对人类健康的潜在影响。

IF 1.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ki-Hyun Kim, Ehsanul Kabir, Shamin Ara Jahan
{"title":"审查作为烟草香烟替代品的电子香烟:其对人类健康的潜在影响。","authors":"Ki-Hyun Kim, Ehsanul Kabir, Shamin Ara Jahan","doi":"10.1080/10590501.2016.1236604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are devised to deliver nicotine in a vapor rather than in smoke without tar. ECs are hence advertised as being safer than tobacco cigarette products as the chemical compounds inhaled in the former are believed to be fewer and less toxic than those of the latter. Hazardous chemicals (e.g., formaldehyde) are nonetheless found to be generated incidentally by contacting the heated wire (i.e., the oxidation of glycerol/glycol in e-liquid). Although the extent of their release varies by several variables (e.g., the type of e-liquid, puffing rate, and the battery voltage), their exposure may also contribute to negative health effects. As the use of ECs may be much safer than that of common tobacco products, the former can be used as an aid to cut down or quit the latter. However, relatively little is yet known about the health effects of the EC on a long-term basis. Moreover, the use of EC cannot be clearly substantiated for renormalizing smoking behavior by current evidence. Behavior studies of the EC consumer suggest that the sufficient data for aerosol generation and chemical analysis should be acquired to establish reliable guides for its composition and consumption. In light of the urgent demand for such guidelines, this review examines the basic aspects of EC-related pollutants and their health effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":53200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C-Toxicology and Carcinogenesis","volume":"34 1","pages":"262-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: Their potential human health impact.\",\"authors\":\"Ki-Hyun Kim, Ehsanul Kabir, Shamin Ara Jahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10590501.2016.1236604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are devised to deliver nicotine in a vapor rather than in smoke without tar. ECs are hence advertised as being safer than tobacco cigarette products as the chemical compounds inhaled in the former are believed to be fewer and less toxic than those of the latter. Hazardous chemicals (e.g., formaldehyde) are nonetheless found to be generated incidentally by contacting the heated wire (i.e., the oxidation of glycerol/glycol in e-liquid). Although the extent of their release varies by several variables (e.g., the type of e-liquid, puffing rate, and the battery voltage), their exposure may also contribute to negative health effects. As the use of ECs may be much safer than that of common tobacco products, the former can be used as an aid to cut down or quit the latter. However, relatively little is yet known about the health effects of the EC on a long-term basis. Moreover, the use of EC cannot be clearly substantiated for renormalizing smoking behavior by current evidence. Behavior studies of the EC consumer suggest that the sufficient data for aerosol generation and chemical analysis should be acquired to establish reliable guides for its composition and consumption. In light of the urgent demand for such guidelines, this review examines the basic aspects of EC-related pollutants and their health effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C-Toxicology and Carcinogenesis\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"262-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C-Toxicology and Carcinogenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2016.1236604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C-Toxicology and Carcinogenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2016.1236604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子香烟(Electronic cigarettes,ECs)的设计是以蒸汽而不是烟雾的形式提供尼古丁,不含焦油。因此,电子香烟被宣传为比烟草香烟产品更安全,因为前者吸入的化学物质被认为比后者更少,毒性更低。然而,人们发现,有害化学物质(如甲醛)会在接触加热的电线(即电子液体中的甘油/乙二醇氧化)时偶然产生。雖然這些物質的釋放程度因多個變數而異( 例如電 子液的種類、吸啜速度和電池電壓) ,但接觸這些物質也可能對健康造成 負面影響。由于使用电子烟可能比使用普通烟草制品安全得多,前者可作为减少或戒除后者的辅助手段。不過,有關氨基甲酸乙酯對健康的長期影響,目前仍所知甚少。此外,目前的證據亦未能清楚證明使用煙草 產品可令吸煙行為回復正常。对氨基甲酸乙酯消费者的行为研究表明,应获得足够的气溶胶产生和化学分析数据,以便为氨基甲酸乙酯的成分和消费提供可靠的指导。鉴于对此类指导原则的迫切需求,本综述研究了与电子烟有关的污染物的基本方面及其对健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: Their potential human health impact.

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are devised to deliver nicotine in a vapor rather than in smoke without tar. ECs are hence advertised as being safer than tobacco cigarette products as the chemical compounds inhaled in the former are believed to be fewer and less toxic than those of the latter. Hazardous chemicals (e.g., formaldehyde) are nonetheless found to be generated incidentally by contacting the heated wire (i.e., the oxidation of glycerol/glycol in e-liquid). Although the extent of their release varies by several variables (e.g., the type of e-liquid, puffing rate, and the battery voltage), their exposure may also contribute to negative health effects. As the use of ECs may be much safer than that of common tobacco products, the former can be used as an aid to cut down or quit the latter. However, relatively little is yet known about the health effects of the EC on a long-term basis. Moreover, the use of EC cannot be clearly substantiated for renormalizing smoking behavior by current evidence. Behavior studies of the EC consumer suggest that the sufficient data for aerosol generation and chemical analysis should be acquired to establish reliable guides for its composition and consumption. In light of the urgent demand for such guidelines, this review examines the basic aspects of EC-related pollutants and their health effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信