{"title":"转型经济体的财政政策:后记","authors":"J. Brada","doi":"10.1080/10889388.2000.10641159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this and several preceding issues of Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, we have published analyses of fiscal policy in Hungary (Kiss and Szapary, 2000), the Czech Republic (Drabek and Schneider, 2000), and Poland (Kemme and Rapacki, 2000). These analyses are based on papers presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Comparative Economic Studies in January 2000 and subsequently revised and updated for publication here. Such a systematic comparison of fiscal policy in these three transition economies is both timely and important for our understanding of the process of post-transition stabilization and of the longer-term disinflation that has been taking place in these economies during the 1990s. These processes will also have to continue if these three countries are to realize their goal of membership in the EU in the next five years. These surveys of fiscal policy reform also are motivated by the fact that, while a very large body of research has appeared on the monetary policy of the transition economies (see Davis and Patterson, 2001), much less attention has been paid to fiscal policy. This emphasis on monetary policy is perhaps mis-placed because, although monetary policy is important for both stabilization and exchange-rate policy, given the embryonic state of financial markets in these countries in the early tran-sition period, close coordination between fiscal and monetary policy was critical if money markets were not to be swamped by the central banks? need to finance government deficits. Moreover, just as the possibilities for an effective monetary policy depended on the creation of institutions that could support and mediate such policy, so did the introduction of an effective fiscal policy depend on the elimination of the socialist-era tax system, with its emphasis on the turnover and enterprise taxes, and on the creation of a modern system of taxation and of the agencies required to administer it. Indeed, Kiss and Szapary (2000, p. 233) are not off the mark when they argue that fiscal policy became the epicenter of the transformation process. In this paper, I will briefly summarize the lessons that these three valuable papers provide. I shall also attempt to draw some broader conclusions regarding the role of fiscal policy in the course of transition by comparing the experiences of the three countries.","PeriodicalId":85332,"journal":{"name":"Post-Soviet geography and economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"599 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10889388.2000.10641159","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal Policy in Transition Economies: A Postscript\",\"authors\":\"J. Brada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10889388.2000.10641159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this and several preceding issues of Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, we have published analyses of fiscal policy in Hungary (Kiss and Szapary, 2000), the Czech Republic (Drabek and Schneider, 2000), and Poland (Kemme and Rapacki, 2000). These analyses are based on papers presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Comparative Economic Studies in January 2000 and subsequently revised and updated for publication here. Such a systematic comparison of fiscal policy in these three transition economies is both timely and important for our understanding of the process of post-transition stabilization and of the longer-term disinflation that has been taking place in these economies during the 1990s. These processes will also have to continue if these three countries are to realize their goal of membership in the EU in the next five years. These surveys of fiscal policy reform also are motivated by the fact that, while a very large body of research has appeared on the monetary policy of the transition economies (see Davis and Patterson, 2001), much less attention has been paid to fiscal policy. This emphasis on monetary policy is perhaps mis-placed because, although monetary policy is important for both stabilization and exchange-rate policy, given the embryonic state of financial markets in these countries in the early tran-sition period, close coordination between fiscal and monetary policy was critical if money markets were not to be swamped by the central banks? need to finance government deficits. Moreover, just as the possibilities for an effective monetary policy depended on the creation of institutions that could support and mediate such policy, so did the introduction of an effective fiscal policy depend on the elimination of the socialist-era tax system, with its emphasis on the turnover and enterprise taxes, and on the creation of a modern system of taxation and of the agencies required to administer it. Indeed, Kiss and Szapary (2000, p. 233) are not off the mark when they argue that fiscal policy became the epicenter of the transformation process. In this paper, I will briefly summarize the lessons that these three valuable papers provide. I shall also attempt to draw some broader conclusions regarding the role of fiscal policy in the course of transition by comparing the experiences of the three countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Soviet geography and economics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"599 - 604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10889388.2000.10641159\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Soviet geography and economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10889388.2000.10641159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Soviet geography and economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10889388.2000.10641159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在本期和前几期《后苏联地理与经济学》中,我们发表了对匈牙利(Kiss and Szapary, 2000)、捷克共和国(Drabek and Schneider, 2000)和波兰(Kemme and Rapacki, 2000)财政政策的分析。这些分析基于2000年1月比较经济研究协会年会上发表的论文,随后进行了修订和更新,以便在这里发表。对这三个转型经济体的财政政策进行这种系统的比较,对于我们理解转型后的稳定过程和20世纪90年代在这些经济体中发生的长期反通货膨胀,既及时又重要。如果这三个国家要在未来五年内实现成为欧盟成员国的目标,这些进程也必须继续下去。这些关于财政政策改革的调查也受到这样一个事实的推动,即尽管对转型经济体的货币政策进行了大量研究(见Davis和Patterson, 2001),但对财政政策的关注要少得多。这种对货币政策的强调可能是错误的,因为尽管货币政策对稳定和汇率政策都很重要,但鉴于这些国家在早期过渡时期金融市场的萌芽状态,如果货币市场不被中央银行淹没,财政和货币政策之间的密切协调是至关重要的。需要为政府赤字融资。此外,正如有效货币政策的可能性取决于能够支持和调解这种政策的机构的建立一样,有效财政政策的引入也取决于消除社会主义时代的税收制度,其重点是营业额和企业税,以及建立现代税收制度和管理该制度所需的机构。事实上,Kiss和Szapary(2000,第233页)认为财政政策成为转型过程的中心,他们并没有说错。在本文中,我将简要总结这三篇有价值的论文提供的经验教训。我还将通过比较这三个国家的经验,试图就财政政策在转型过程中的作用得出一些更广泛的结论。
Fiscal Policy in Transition Economies: A Postscript
In this and several preceding issues of Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, we have published analyses of fiscal policy in Hungary (Kiss and Szapary, 2000), the Czech Republic (Drabek and Schneider, 2000), and Poland (Kemme and Rapacki, 2000). These analyses are based on papers presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Comparative Economic Studies in January 2000 and subsequently revised and updated for publication here. Such a systematic comparison of fiscal policy in these three transition economies is both timely and important for our understanding of the process of post-transition stabilization and of the longer-term disinflation that has been taking place in these economies during the 1990s. These processes will also have to continue if these three countries are to realize their goal of membership in the EU in the next five years. These surveys of fiscal policy reform also are motivated by the fact that, while a very large body of research has appeared on the monetary policy of the transition economies (see Davis and Patterson, 2001), much less attention has been paid to fiscal policy. This emphasis on monetary policy is perhaps mis-placed because, although monetary policy is important for both stabilization and exchange-rate policy, given the embryonic state of financial markets in these countries in the early tran-sition period, close coordination between fiscal and monetary policy was critical if money markets were not to be swamped by the central banks? need to finance government deficits. Moreover, just as the possibilities for an effective monetary policy depended on the creation of institutions that could support and mediate such policy, so did the introduction of an effective fiscal policy depend on the elimination of the socialist-era tax system, with its emphasis on the turnover and enterprise taxes, and on the creation of a modern system of taxation and of the agencies required to administer it. Indeed, Kiss and Szapary (2000, p. 233) are not off the mark when they argue that fiscal policy became the epicenter of the transformation process. In this paper, I will briefly summarize the lessons that these three valuable papers provide. I shall also attempt to draw some broader conclusions regarding the role of fiscal policy in the course of transition by comparing the experiences of the three countries.