Ipad文本转语音和重复阅读提高特殊语言障碍学生的阅读理解能力

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Saeed S. Alqahtani
{"title":"Ipad文本转语音和重复阅读提高特殊语言障碍学生的阅读理解能力","authors":"Saeed S. Alqahtani","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2021.1987363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have difficulty with most reading skills, including reading comprehension. Improving reading comprehension skills requires efficient interventions that consider both meaning- and code-based skills simultaneously. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design across participants, with alternating treatment design, this study compared two reading interventions (repeated reading vs. iPad text-to-speech) combined with a meta-cognitive strategy (question generation). Three fourth-grade and third-grade students who had been diagnosed by their school as having reading difficulties participated in the study. Using the index of narrative complexity, two participants showed improvement in reading comprehension skills. However, there were slight differences for the RAAC intervention over the iPad intervention for one participant. The time required to administer the iPad intervention was shorter than the time required to administer the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) intervention (an average of 12.73 min for the repeated reading vs. 5.45 min for the iPad).","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ipad Text-to-Speech and Repeated Reading to Improve Reading Comprehension for Students with SLD\",\"authors\":\"Saeed S. Alqahtani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10573569.2021.1987363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have difficulty with most reading skills, including reading comprehension. Improving reading comprehension skills requires efficient interventions that consider both meaning- and code-based skills simultaneously. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design across participants, with alternating treatment design, this study compared two reading interventions (repeated reading vs. iPad text-to-speech) combined with a meta-cognitive strategy (question generation). Three fourth-grade and third-grade students who had been diagnosed by their school as having reading difficulties participated in the study. Using the index of narrative complexity, two participants showed improvement in reading comprehension skills. However, there were slight differences for the RAAC intervention over the iPad intervention for one participant. The time required to administer the iPad intervention was shorter than the time required to administer the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) intervention (an average of 12.73 min for the repeated reading vs. 5.45 min for the iPad).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1987363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1987363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

特殊学习障碍(SLD)学生在大多数阅读技能上存在困难,包括阅读理解。提高阅读理解能力需要同时考虑基于意义和基于代码的技能的有效干预。本研究采用单受试者多基线设计,采用交替治疗设计,结合元认知策略(问题生成),比较了两种阅读干预措施(重复阅读与iPad文本转语音)。三名四年级和三年级的学生参加了这项研究,他们被学校诊断为有阅读困难。使用叙述复杂性指数,两名参与者的阅读理解能力有所提高。然而,对于一个参与者来说,RAAC干预与iPad干预有轻微的差异。iPad干预所需的时间比Reread-Adapt and answer - understanding (RAAC)干预所需的时间短(重复阅读平均为12.73分钟,iPad为5.45分钟)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ipad Text-to-Speech and Repeated Reading to Improve Reading Comprehension for Students with SLD
Abstract Students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have difficulty with most reading skills, including reading comprehension. Improving reading comprehension skills requires efficient interventions that consider both meaning- and code-based skills simultaneously. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design across participants, with alternating treatment design, this study compared two reading interventions (repeated reading vs. iPad text-to-speech) combined with a meta-cognitive strategy (question generation). Three fourth-grade and third-grade students who had been diagnosed by their school as having reading difficulties participated in the study. Using the index of narrative complexity, two participants showed improvement in reading comprehension skills. However, there were slight differences for the RAAC intervention over the iPad intervention for one participant. The time required to administer the iPad intervention was shorter than the time required to administer the Reread-Adapt and Answer-Comprehend (RAAC) intervention (an average of 12.73 min for the repeated reading vs. 5.45 min for the iPad).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信