编辑介绍

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jae-Eun Joo, James Seale-Collazo
{"title":"编辑介绍","authors":"Jae-Eun Joo, James Seale-Collazo","doi":"10.1080/09585176.2015.1050240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some time ago, it was commonplace to hear that classrooms and teaching, unlike many other aspects of daily life, had remained largely unchanged throughout the twentieth century: teachers at the front, with chalk (later markers), talking to students sitting in rows, transmitting information they would later be expected to regurgitate. Freire (1999) does not hesitate to name this the ‘banking’ concept of education, predicated on the assumption of the fundamentally passive and didactic nature of teaching and learning in classrooms. By receiving, filing, and storing deposits of information and withdrawing them later, students are considered to perform their duties. How much that has changed is, of course, still subject to debate, but the turn of the 21st century has seen computers and other digital devices progressively taking up more space in classrooms (and, metaphorically, in syllabi, assignments, and teachers’ and students’ lives). Perhaps more significantly, the large-scale entry some might say intrusion of digital communication technologies into classrooms at all levels of instruction has introduced new dynamics, and particularly challenges to magisterial authority. Law professors’ interpretations may be questioned by googling students, and high school teachers must deal with students’ surreptitious in-class texting and gaming. Freire argues that if we believe that knowledge emerges through invention and reinvention, our view of knowledge as ‘motionless, static, compartmentalized and predictable (p. 67)’ needs to be challenged. He claims, instead, that knowledge is ‘restless, impatient and continuing (p. 68)’, which new technologies have enormous potential to supply to classrooms (Freire & Macedo, 1998). For example, the advent of networked technologies, accessible to millions of people, and the availability of information on a scale surpassing any library in history, have set the stage for a dispersed wave of unprecedented curricular innovation, away from the historic centres of industrial and colonial power. The rapid pace of technological change has also left many educators lagging far behind their students’ abilities to learn and utilise though not necessarily take the best advantage of the latest devices and applications. Classroom teachers around the world will attest to the difficulties these developments present to teaching, as it was known throughout most of the past century.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"193 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2015.1050240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial introduction\",\"authors\":\"Jae-Eun Joo, James Seale-Collazo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09585176.2015.1050240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some time ago, it was commonplace to hear that classrooms and teaching, unlike many other aspects of daily life, had remained largely unchanged throughout the twentieth century: teachers at the front, with chalk (later markers), talking to students sitting in rows, transmitting information they would later be expected to regurgitate. Freire (1999) does not hesitate to name this the ‘banking’ concept of education, predicated on the assumption of the fundamentally passive and didactic nature of teaching and learning in classrooms. By receiving, filing, and storing deposits of information and withdrawing them later, students are considered to perform their duties. How much that has changed is, of course, still subject to debate, but the turn of the 21st century has seen computers and other digital devices progressively taking up more space in classrooms (and, metaphorically, in syllabi, assignments, and teachers’ and students’ lives). Perhaps more significantly, the large-scale entry some might say intrusion of digital communication technologies into classrooms at all levels of instruction has introduced new dynamics, and particularly challenges to magisterial authority. Law professors’ interpretations may be questioned by googling students, and high school teachers must deal with students’ surreptitious in-class texting and gaming. Freire argues that if we believe that knowledge emerges through invention and reinvention, our view of knowledge as ‘motionless, static, compartmentalized and predictable (p. 67)’ needs to be challenged. He claims, instead, that knowledge is ‘restless, impatient and continuing (p. 68)’, which new technologies have enormous potential to supply to classrooms (Freire & Macedo, 1998). For example, the advent of networked technologies, accessible to millions of people, and the availability of information on a scale surpassing any library in history, have set the stage for a dispersed wave of unprecedented curricular innovation, away from the historic centres of industrial and colonial power. The rapid pace of technological change has also left many educators lagging far behind their students’ abilities to learn and utilise though not necessarily take the best advantage of the latest devices and applications. Classroom teachers around the world will attest to the difficulties these developments present to teaching, as it was known throughout most of the past century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09585176.2015.1050240\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1050240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1050240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不久前,人们经常听到这样的说法:与日常生活的许多其他方面不同,课堂和教学在整个20世纪基本上没有改变:教师站在讲台上,拿着粉笔(后来的马克笔),与一排排坐着的学生交谈,传递他们日后会反刍的信息。Freire(1999)毫不犹豫地将其命名为教育的“银行”概念,该概念基于课堂教学的基本被动和说教性质的假设。通过接收、归档和存储信息,并在以后提取信息,学生被认为是履行了自己的职责。当然,这种变化有多大仍有待讨论,但在21世纪之交,计算机和其他数字设备逐渐在教室中占据了更多的空间(隐喻地说,在教学大纲、作业以及教师和学生的生活中也是如此)。也许更重要的是,数字通信技术的大规模进入——有人可能会说——是对各级教学课堂的入侵——带来了新的动态,尤其是对权威的挑战。法学教授的解释可能会受到用谷歌搜索的学生的质疑,高中教师必须处理学生在课堂上偷偷发短信和玩游戏的问题。弗莱雷认为,如果我们相信知识是通过发明和再发明而产生的,那么我们对知识“静止的、静态的、划分的和可预测的(第67页)”的看法需要受到挑战。相反,他声称,知识是“不安分的、不耐烦的和持续的(第68页)”,新技术有巨大的潜力为课堂提供这些知识(Freire & Macedo, 1998)。例如,数以百万计的人可以使用的网络技术的出现,以及超过历史上任何图书馆的信息的可获得性,已经为一场前所未有的课程创新的分散浪潮奠定了基础,远离了工业和殖民大国的历史中心。技术变革的快速步伐也使许多教育工作者远远落后于学生的学习和利用能力,尽管不一定能充分利用最新设备和应用程序。世界各地的课堂教师将证明这些发展给教学带来的困难,正如在过去的一个世纪里所知的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial introduction
Some time ago, it was commonplace to hear that classrooms and teaching, unlike many other aspects of daily life, had remained largely unchanged throughout the twentieth century: teachers at the front, with chalk (later markers), talking to students sitting in rows, transmitting information they would later be expected to regurgitate. Freire (1999) does not hesitate to name this the ‘banking’ concept of education, predicated on the assumption of the fundamentally passive and didactic nature of teaching and learning in classrooms. By receiving, filing, and storing deposits of information and withdrawing them later, students are considered to perform their duties. How much that has changed is, of course, still subject to debate, but the turn of the 21st century has seen computers and other digital devices progressively taking up more space in classrooms (and, metaphorically, in syllabi, assignments, and teachers’ and students’ lives). Perhaps more significantly, the large-scale entry some might say intrusion of digital communication technologies into classrooms at all levels of instruction has introduced new dynamics, and particularly challenges to magisterial authority. Law professors’ interpretations may be questioned by googling students, and high school teachers must deal with students’ surreptitious in-class texting and gaming. Freire argues that if we believe that knowledge emerges through invention and reinvention, our view of knowledge as ‘motionless, static, compartmentalized and predictable (p. 67)’ needs to be challenged. He claims, instead, that knowledge is ‘restless, impatient and continuing (p. 68)’, which new technologies have enormous potential to supply to classrooms (Freire & Macedo, 1998). For example, the advent of networked technologies, accessible to millions of people, and the availability of information on a scale surpassing any library in history, have set the stage for a dispersed wave of unprecedented curricular innovation, away from the historic centres of industrial and colonial power. The rapid pace of technological change has also left many educators lagging far behind their students’ abilities to learn and utilise though not necessarily take the best advantage of the latest devices and applications. Classroom teachers around the world will attest to the difficulties these developments present to teaching, as it was known throughout most of the past century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信