英国人真的不擅长学习外语吗

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
James Milton, P. Meara
{"title":"英国人真的不擅长学习外语吗","authors":"James Milton, P. Meara","doi":"10.1080/09571739885200291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports a pilot study which shows that British 14 year olds only have one third to one half of the foreign language vocabulary knowledge of equivalent Greek and German learners. British syllabus objectives and the hours available for formal study are commensurately smaller. It is questioned whether the British GCSE syllabus can meet its own objective to teach communicative ability in a foreign language. The syllabus appears to be particularly disadvantageous to the most and least able learners.","PeriodicalId":46554,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09571739885200291","citationCount":"84","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the British Really Bad at Learning Foreign Languages\",\"authors\":\"James Milton, P. Meara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09571739885200291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports a pilot study which shows that British 14 year olds only have one third to one half of the foreign language vocabulary knowledge of equivalent Greek and German learners. British syllabus objectives and the hours available for formal study are commensurately smaller. It is questioned whether the British GCSE syllabus can meet its own objective to teach communicative ability in a foreign language. The syllabus appears to be particularly disadvantageous to the most and least able learners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Learning Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"68-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09571739885200291\",\"citationCount\":\"84\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Learning Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739885200291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739885200291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

摘要

本文报告了一项初步研究,该研究表明,英国14岁儿童的外语词汇知识仅为希腊和德国同等水平学习者的三分之一到二分之一。英国教学大纲的目标和可供正式学习的时间相对较少。英国普通中等教育证书教学大纲是否能达到教授外语交际能力的目的,这是值得怀疑的。教学大纲似乎对能力最强和最差的学习者尤其不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are the British Really Bad at Learning Foreign Languages
This paper reports a pilot study which shows that British 14 year olds only have one third to one half of the foreign language vocabulary knowledge of equivalent Greek and German learners. British syllabus objectives and the hours available for formal study are commensurately smaller. It is questioned whether the British GCSE syllabus can meet its own objective to teach communicative ability in a foreign language. The syllabus appears to be particularly disadvantageous to the most and least able learners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Learning Journal
Language Learning Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Language Learning Journal (LLJ) provides a forum for scholarly contributions on current aspects of foreign language and teaching. LLJ is an international, peer-reviewed journal that is intended for an international readership, including foreign language teachers, language teacher educators, researchers and policy makers. Contributions, in English, tend to assume a certain range of target languages. These are usually, but not exclusively, the languages of mainland Europe and ‘Community Languages’; other languages, including English as a foreign language, may also be appropriate, where the discussion is sufficiently generalisable. The following are key areas of interest: -Relationships between policy, theory and practice- Pedagogical practices in classrooms and less formal settings Foreign language learning/teaching in all phases, from early learners to higher and adult education- Policy and practice in the UK and other countries- Classroom practice in all its aspects- Classroom-based research- Methodological questions in teaching and research- Multilingualism and multiculturalism- New technologies and foreign languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信