安东尼·哈蒙德:“先生。表面“皮”的持久编码器

IF 0.6 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 1999-04-01 DOI:10.1080/01440362008539584

K. Smith

{"title":"安东尼·哈蒙德:“先生。表面“皮”的持久编码器","authors":"K. Smith","doi":"10.1080/01440362008539584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Throughout the nineteenth century dissatisfaction with the criminal law frequently centred on its disparate and inaccessible state. For many reformers, particularly of a Benthamite persuasion, the route to salvation lay in the direction of the law's codification. This article examines the tenacious efforts of the barrister Anthony Hammond in the 1820s to expand Peel's limited schemes for the consolidation of criminal law statutes into a more radical, wide-ranging codification programme.","PeriodicalId":43796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal History","volume":"20 1","pages":"24-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440362008539584","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthony Hammond: ‘Mr. Surface’ Peel's Persistent Codifier\",\"authors\":\"K. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01440362008539584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Throughout the nineteenth century dissatisfaction with the criminal law frequently centred on its disparate and inaccessible state. For many reformers, particularly of a Benthamite persuasion, the route to salvation lay in the direction of the law's codification. This article examines the tenacious efforts of the barrister Anthony Hammond in the 1820s to expand Peel's limited schemes for the consolidation of criminal law statutes into a more radical, wide-ranging codification programme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"24-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440362008539584\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440362008539584\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440362008539584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在整个19世纪，人们对刑法的不满常常集中在其支离破碎和难以理解的状态上。对于许多改革家来说，尤其是边沁派的改革家，拯救之路在于法律的编纂方向。本文考察了律师安东尼·哈蒙德(Anthony Hammond)在19世纪20年代的顽强努力，他将皮尔有限的刑法法规整合计划扩展为一个更激进、更广泛的编纂计划。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Anthony Hammond: ‘Mr. Surface’ Peel's Persistent Codifier

Abstract Throughout the nineteenth century dissatisfaction with the criminal law frequently centred on its disparate and inaccessible state. For many reformers, particularly of a Benthamite persuasion, the route to salvation lay in the direction of the law's codification. This article examines the tenacious efforts of the barrister Anthony Hammond in the 1820s to expand Peel's limited schemes for the consolidation of criminal law statutes into a more radical, wide-ranging codification programme.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Legal History HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Legal History, founded in 1980, is the only British journal concerned solely with legal history. It publishes articles in English on the sources and development of the common law, both in the British Isles and overseas, on the history of the laws of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and on Roman Law and the European legal tradition. There is a section for shorter research notes, review-articles, and a wide-ranging section of reviews of recent literature.