“旧上衣上的新纽扣”:《垄断法》，21世纪詹姆士一世第3章

IF 0.6 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of Legal History Pub Date : 1998-12-01 DOI:10.1080/01440361908539576

Chris R. Kyle

{"title":"“旧上衣上的新纽扣”:《垄断法》，21世纪詹姆士一世第3章","authors":"Chris R. Kyle","doi":"10.1080/01440361908539576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Monopolies Act of 1624 is the founding statute of copyright and patent law in the English-speaking Western world. Based upon the famous legal cases of John the Dyer and Darcy v. Allen, as well as the King's Book of Bounty, the Act has been seen as a symbol of the increasing power of a Parliament locked in a constitutional struggle with King James. This article argues that far from being a case of conflict between the monarch and the House of Commons, the Monopolies Act received the imprimatur of both the King and Commons against the wishes of powerful interests in the Lords. It concludes by stating that the significance of 21 James I cap.3 lies not only in its limitation on monopolies but that its enactment illustrates the close co-operation between the King and Commons.","PeriodicalId":43796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal History","volume":"19 1","pages":"203-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440361908539576","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘But a New Button to an Old Coat’: The Enactment of the Statute of Monopolies, 21 James I cap.3\",\"authors\":\"Chris R. Kyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01440361908539576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Monopolies Act of 1624 is the founding statute of copyright and patent law in the English-speaking Western world. Based upon the famous legal cases of John the Dyer and Darcy v. Allen, as well as the King's Book of Bounty, the Act has been seen as a symbol of the increasing power of a Parliament locked in a constitutional struggle with King James. This article argues that far from being a case of conflict between the monarch and the House of Commons, the Monopolies Act received the imprimatur of both the King and Commons against the wishes of powerful interests in the Lords. It concludes by stating that the significance of 21 James I cap.3 lies not only in its limitation on monopolies but that its enactment illustrates the close co-operation between the King and Commons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"203-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01440361908539576\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440361908539576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01440361908539576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

摘要

1624年的《垄断法》是西方英语国家版权法和专利法的奠基性法规。基于著名的“约翰·戴尔”和“达西诉艾伦”案，以及《国王的赏金书》，该法案被视为议会权力日益增强的象征，议会与詹姆斯国王陷入了宪法斗争。本文认为，《垄断法》远不是君主与下议院之间的冲突，而是在反对上议院强大利益集团的意愿的情况下，得到了国王和下议院的认可。文章最后指出，詹姆斯一世第21章第3章的意义不仅在于它对垄断的限制，还在于它的颁布说明了国王与下议院之间的密切合作。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

‘But a New Button to an Old Coat’: The Enactment of the Statute of Monopolies, 21 James I cap.3

Abstract The Monopolies Act of 1624 is the founding statute of copyright and patent law in the English-speaking Western world. Based upon the famous legal cases of John the Dyer and Darcy v. Allen, as well as the King's Book of Bounty, the Act has been seen as a symbol of the increasing power of a Parliament locked in a constitutional struggle with King James. This article argues that far from being a case of conflict between the monarch and the House of Commons, the Monopolies Act received the imprimatur of both the King and Commons against the wishes of powerful interests in the Lords. It concludes by stating that the significance of 21 James I cap.3 lies not only in its limitation on monopolies but that its enactment illustrates the close co-operation between the King and Commons.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Legal History HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Legal History, founded in 1980, is the only British journal concerned solely with legal history. It publishes articles in English on the sources and development of the common law, both in the British Isles and overseas, on the history of the laws of Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and on Roman Law and the European legal tradition. There is a section for shorter research notes, review-articles, and a wide-ranging section of reviews of recent literature.