通过穿插技巧提高相对问题完成率,增强对数学作业的感知。

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
C. Skinner, Kim Hall-johnson, Amy L. Skinner, Gary L. Cates, James Weber, G. Johns
{"title":"通过穿插技巧提高相对问题完成率,增强对数学作业的感知。","authors":"C. Skinner, Kim Hall-johnson, Amy L. Skinner, Gary L. Cates, James Weber, G. Johns","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Students solved mathematics problems from 4 assignment pairs. Each control assignment contained 18 target multiplication problems that were 4 × 1-digit (4 × 1), 4 × 2, 4 × 3, or 4 × 4. Each paired experimental assignment contained 18 similar problems plus 6 interspersed 1 × 1-digit problems. After computing problems from each pair of assignments, the students rated them and chose 1 for homework. Across all assignment pairs, problem completion rates were greater on the experimental assignments, and significantly more students chose a new experimental, rather than control, assignment for homework. Furthermore, as the discrepancy between problem completion rates increased across assignment pairs, the probability of students' choosing the experimental assignment for homework and rating the experimental assignment more favorably with respect to difficulty, effort, and time also increased. The relationship between student choice behaviors and relative problem completion rates has theoretical and applie...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"43-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598493","citationCount":"79","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Perceptions of Mathematics Assignments by Increasing Relative Problem Completion Rates through the Interspersal Technique.\",\"authors\":\"C. Skinner, Kim Hall-johnson, Amy L. Skinner, Gary L. Cates, James Weber, G. Johns\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979909598493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Students solved mathematics problems from 4 assignment pairs. Each control assignment contained 18 target multiplication problems that were 4 × 1-digit (4 × 1), 4 × 2, 4 × 3, or 4 × 4. Each paired experimental assignment contained 18 similar problems plus 6 interspersed 1 × 1-digit problems. After computing problems from each pair of assignments, the students rated them and chose 1 for homework. Across all assignment pairs, problem completion rates were greater on the experimental assignments, and significantly more students chose a new experimental, rather than control, assignment for homework. Furthermore, as the discrepancy between problem completion rates increased across assignment pairs, the probability of students' choosing the experimental assignment for homework and rating the experimental assignment more favorably with respect to difficulty, effort, and time also increased. The relationship between student choice behaviors and relative problem completion rates has theoretical and applie...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"43-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598493\",\"citationCount\":\"79\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598493\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

摘要

学生从4对作业中解决数学问题。每个控制任务包含18个目标乘法问题,分别为4 × 1、4 × 2、4 × 3或4 × 4。每个配对的实验作业包含18个类似的问题加上6个分散的1 × 1位数问题。在计算出每对作业中的问题后,学生们对它们进行评分,并选择1作为家庭作业。在所有的作业对中,实验作业的问题完成率更高,更多的学生选择新的实验作业作为家庭作业,而不是对照作业。此外,随着作业对之间的问题完成率差异的增加,学生选择实验作业作为家庭作业并在难度、努力和时间方面对实验作业给予更有利评价的可能性也增加了。学生选择行为与相对问题完成率之间的关系具有理论和应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Perceptions of Mathematics Assignments by Increasing Relative Problem Completion Rates through the Interspersal Technique.
Abstract Students solved mathematics problems from 4 assignment pairs. Each control assignment contained 18 target multiplication problems that were 4 × 1-digit (4 × 1), 4 × 2, 4 × 3, or 4 × 4. Each paired experimental assignment contained 18 similar problems plus 6 interspersed 1 × 1-digit problems. After computing problems from each pair of assignments, the students rated them and chose 1 for homework. Across all assignment pairs, problem completion rates were greater on the experimental assignments, and significantly more students chose a new experimental, rather than control, assignment for homework. Furthermore, as the discrepancy between problem completion rates increased across assignment pairs, the probability of students' choosing the experimental assignment for homework and rating the experimental assignment more favorably with respect to difficulty, effort, and time also increased. The relationship between student choice behaviors and relative problem completion rates has theoretical and applie...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信