使用同伴模型来教授自我调节

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Carolyn Orange
{"title":"使用同伴模型来教授自我调节","authors":"Carolyn Orange","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The author used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to model self-regulation subprocesses as latent concepts in an examination of the effectiveness of peer modeling for teaching self-regulation. The design was a nonequivalent pretestposttest control group design with 63 participants (52 women and 11 men). The experimental group received self-regulation training through a self-regulation videotape and a peer-advocated action plan. The control group received no training. Difference scores were calculated for both groups and analyzed with analysis of variance. The author used a 50-item Likert-type Self-Regulation Inventory (SRI) as a pretest and posttest to measure participants' self-regulatory attitudes and behaviors. The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group. The author used CFA to test the goodness of fit between a hypothesized model of self-regulation and the sample data. On the basis of a priori specification of the CFA model, the author predicted that response...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"21-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598492","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Peer Modeling to Teach Self-Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Orange\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979909598492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The author used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to model self-regulation subprocesses as latent concepts in an examination of the effectiveness of peer modeling for teaching self-regulation. The design was a nonequivalent pretestposttest control group design with 63 participants (52 women and 11 men). The experimental group received self-regulation training through a self-regulation videotape and a peer-advocated action plan. The control group received no training. Difference scores were calculated for both groups and analyzed with analysis of variance. The author used a 50-item Likert-type Self-Regulation Inventory (SRI) as a pretest and posttest to measure participants' self-regulatory attitudes and behaviors. The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group. The author used CFA to test the goodness of fit between a hypothesized model of self-regulation and the sample data. On the basis of a priori specification of the CFA model, the author predicted that response...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"21-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598492\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

摘要本文采用验证性因子分析(CFA)对自我调节子过程作为潜在概念进行建模,以检验同伴建模对教学自我调节的有效性。设计为63名参与者(52名女性和11名男性)的非等效测试前和测试后对照组设计。实验组通过自我调节录像带和同伴倡导的行动计划接受自我调节训练。对照组不接受任何训练。计算两组的差异评分,并进行方差分析。采用李克特自我调节量表(Likert-type Self-Regulation Inventory, SRI)作为前测和后测,对被试的自我调节态度和行为进行测量。实验组的治疗效果明显优于对照组。作者使用CFA来检验自我调节假设模型与样本数据之间的拟合优度。在对CFA模型进行先验规范的基础上,作者预测:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Peer Modeling to Teach Self-Regulation
Abstract The author used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to model self-regulation subprocesses as latent concepts in an examination of the effectiveness of peer modeling for teaching self-regulation. The design was a nonequivalent pretestposttest control group design with 63 participants (52 women and 11 men). The experimental group received self-regulation training through a self-regulation videotape and a peer-advocated action plan. The control group received no training. Difference scores were calculated for both groups and analyzed with analysis of variance. The author used a 50-item Likert-type Self-Regulation Inventory (SRI) as a pretest and posttest to measure participants' self-regulatory attitudes and behaviors. The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group. The author used CFA to test the goodness of fit between a hypothesized model of self-regulation and the sample data. On the basis of a priori specification of the CFA model, the author predicted that response...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信