配对标准分布和IRT项目难度的组间差异如何影响Mantel-Haenszel卡方DIF指数的大小

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Jim Penny, Robert Johnson
{"title":"配对标准分布和IRT项目难度的组间差异如何影响Mantel-Haenszel卡方DIF指数的大小","authors":"Jim Penny, Robert Johnson","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The authors demonstrated the empirical relationship between Cohen's chi-square effect size, w, and differential item functioning (DIF), defined as group differences in item response theory (IRT) item difficulty. In Experiment 1, in which the lower asymptote was 0, the authors argued that Cohen's designation of small, medium, and large effects connotes reasonably well for that definition of DIF. In Experiment 2, the lower asymptote of the item response function was raised from 0 to 0.2 and the item discrimination parameter was held to 1.0. Doing so admitted non-crossing nonuniform DIF to the model, violating an underlying assumption of the Mantel–Haenszel procedure that the odds ratio is constant across studied levels of the matching criterion. Smaller difficulty parameter difference resulted, which produced larger effects with an inflation in effect size of about 15%. In Experiment 3, the authors used the 1-parameter logistic model to examine the effect that group differences in the matching crit...","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"67 1","pages":"343-366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598488","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Group Differences in Matching Criterion Distribution and IRT Item Difficulty Can Influence the Magnitude of the Mantel–Haenszel Chi-Square DIF Index\",\"authors\":\"Jim Penny, Robert Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979909598488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The authors demonstrated the empirical relationship between Cohen's chi-square effect size, w, and differential item functioning (DIF), defined as group differences in item response theory (IRT) item difficulty. In Experiment 1, in which the lower asymptote was 0, the authors argued that Cohen's designation of small, medium, and large effects connotes reasonably well for that definition of DIF. In Experiment 2, the lower asymptote of the item response function was raised from 0 to 0.2 and the item discrimination parameter was held to 1.0. Doing so admitted non-crossing nonuniform DIF to the model, violating an underlying assumption of the Mantel–Haenszel procedure that the odds ratio is constant across studied levels of the matching criterion. Smaller difficulty parameter difference resulted, which produced larger effects with an inflation in effect size of about 15%. In Experiment 3, the authors used the 1-parameter logistic model to examine the effect that group differences in the matching crit...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"343-366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598488\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

摘要本文研究了科恩卡方效应量w与差异项目功能(DIF)之间的实证关系,差异项目功能定义为项目反应理论(IRT)项目难度的群体差异。在实验1中,下渐近线为0,作者认为Cohen对小、中、大效应的定义相当好地包含了DIF的定义。在实验2中,项目反应函数的下渐近线由0提高到0.2,项目判别参数保持为1.0。这样做承认了模型的非交叉非均匀DIF,违反了Mantel-Haenszel程序的一个基本假设,即比值比在匹配标准的研究水平上是恒定的。难度参数差异较小,产生的影响较大,效应量膨胀约为15%。在实验3中,作者使用1参数逻辑模型来检验分组差异对匹配临界的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Group Differences in Matching Criterion Distribution and IRT Item Difficulty Can Influence the Magnitude of the Mantel–Haenszel Chi-Square DIF Index
Abstract The authors demonstrated the empirical relationship between Cohen's chi-square effect size, w, and differential item functioning (DIF), defined as group differences in item response theory (IRT) item difficulty. In Experiment 1, in which the lower asymptote was 0, the authors argued that Cohen's designation of small, medium, and large effects connotes reasonably well for that definition of DIF. In Experiment 2, the lower asymptote of the item response function was raised from 0 to 0.2 and the item discrimination parameter was held to 1.0. Doing so admitted non-crossing nonuniform DIF to the model, violating an underlying assumption of the Mantel–Haenszel procedure that the odds ratio is constant across studied levels of the matching criterion. Smaller difficulty parameter difference resulted, which produced larger effects with an inflation in effect size of about 15%. In Experiment 3, the authors used the 1-parameter logistic model to examine the effect that group differences in the matching crit...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信