关于可靠性系数报告的实践:三份期刊综述

IF 2.2 4区教育学 Q1 Social Sciences

Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220979909598487

T. Vacha-haase, Carin M. Ness, Johanna E. Nilsson, David R. Reetz

{"title":"关于可靠性系数报告的实践:三份期刊综述","authors":"T. Vacha-haase, Carin M. Ness, Johanna E. Nilsson, David R. Reetz","doi":"10.1080/00220979909598487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practices regarding the reporting of reliability coefficients in 3 journals from 1990 to 1997 were examined. Given that scores, not tests, are reliable or unreliable, particular attention was paid to the provision of reliability coefficients computed for the data actually being analyzed in substantive studies. One third of the articles reviewed made no mention of reliability. Almost 36% of the articles provided reliability coefficients for the data being analyzed. Examples of good reporting practices are provided. In 2 of the 3 journals reviewed, there was little change in the frequency and style of reliability reporting in the period covered. The authors suggest a modification in editorial journal policies to bring about a change in reliability-coefficient reporting practices.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"67 1","pages":"335-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598487","citationCount":"103","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices Regarding Reporting of Reliability Coefficients: A Review of Three Journals\",\"authors\":\"T. Vacha-haase, Carin M. Ness, Johanna E. Nilsson, David R. Reetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979909598487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Practices regarding the reporting of reliability coefficients in 3 journals from 1990 to 1997 were examined. Given that scores, not tests, are reliable or unreliable, particular attention was paid to the provision of reliability coefficients computed for the data actually being analyzed in substantive studies. One third of the articles reviewed made no mention of reliability. Almost 36% of the articles provided reliability coefficients for the data being analyzed. Examples of good reporting practices are provided. In 2 of the 3 journals reviewed, there was little change in the frequency and style of reliability reporting in the period covered. The authors suggest a modification in editorial journal policies to bring about a change in reliability-coefficient reporting practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"335-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979909598487\",\"citationCount\":\"103\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 103

摘要

研究了1990年至1997年三种期刊关于可靠性系数报告的做法。由于分数而非测试是可靠或不可靠的，因此特别注意提供为实质性研究中实际分析的数据计算的可靠性系数。三分之一的文章没有提到可靠性。近36%的文章提供了被分析数据的可靠性系数。提供了良好报告实践的例子。在所审查的3份期刊中，有2份在报告可靠性的频率和风格上几乎没有变化。作者建议修改编辑期刊政策，以改变可靠性系数报告实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Practices Regarding Reporting of Reliability Coefficients: A Review of Three Journals

Practices regarding the reporting of reliability coefficients in 3 journals from 1990 to 1997 were examined. Given that scores, not tests, are reliable or unreliable, particular attention was paid to the provision of reliability coefficients computed for the data actually being analyzed in substantive studies. One third of the articles reviewed made no mention of reliability. Almost 36% of the articles provided reliability coefficients for the data being analyzed. Examples of good reporting practices are provided. In 2 of the 3 journals reviewed, there was little change in the frequency and style of reliability reporting in the period covered. The authors suggest a modification in editorial journal policies to bring about a change in reliability-coefficient reporting practices.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Education Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.