选择性复试对大学生代数个体化课程成绩的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
S. Juhler, Janice F. Rech, S. From, Monica M. Brogan
{"title":"选择性复试对大学生代数个体化课程成绩的影响。","authors":"S. Juhler, Janice F. Rech, S. From, Monica M. Brogan","doi":"10.1080/00220979809601399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sequential nature of mathematics requires that students master each set of concepts before proceeding to the next. Retesting is a strategy for motivating students to relearn to a mastery level concepts and procedures not mastered initially. To test the effectiveness of this strategy, the authors allowed college students in an intermediate algebra course 1 retest of every test on which they had earned a grade less than B. A significant increase in performance between the initial test and retest was found for approximately 90% of the students who had earned a grade less than B on the initial test. Within each group of students eligible to retake a certain number of unit tests, the number of unit tests that they actually retook was correlated with their grade on the final course examination. None of the correlations were statistically significant. Thus, optional retesting appears to affect initial mastery, but not cumulative mastery.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"66 1","pages":"125-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979809601399","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Optional Retesting on College Students' Achievement in an Individualized Algebra Course.\",\"authors\":\"S. Juhler, Janice F. Rech, S. From, Monica M. Brogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220979809601399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sequential nature of mathematics requires that students master each set of concepts before proceeding to the next. Retesting is a strategy for motivating students to relearn to a mastery level concepts and procedures not mastered initially. To test the effectiveness of this strategy, the authors allowed college students in an intermediate algebra course 1 retest of every test on which they had earned a grade less than B. A significant increase in performance between the initial test and retest was found for approximately 90% of the students who had earned a grade less than B on the initial test. Within each group of students eligible to retake a certain number of unit tests, the number of unit tests that they actually retook was correlated with their grade on the final course examination. None of the correlations were statistically significant. Thus, optional retesting appears to affect initial mastery, but not cumulative mastery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"125-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220979809601399\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979809601399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979809601399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

数学的顺序性要求学生在学习下一组概念之前先掌握每一组概念。复试是一种激励学生重新学习的策略,以达到最初未掌握的概念和程序的掌握水平。为了测试这一策略的有效性,作者让选修中级代数课程1的大学生重新测试每一次成绩低于B的考试。他们发现,在第一次测试和第二次测试之间,大约90%的成绩低于B的学生的成绩显著提高。在每一组有资格重新参加一定数量的单元测试的学生中,他们实际重新参加的单元测试的数量与他们在期末课程考试中的成绩相关。这些相关性均无统计学意义。因此,可选的重测似乎会影响初始掌握,但不会影响累积掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Optional Retesting on College Students' Achievement in an Individualized Algebra Course.
The sequential nature of mathematics requires that students master each set of concepts before proceeding to the next. Retesting is a strategy for motivating students to relearn to a mastery level concepts and procedures not mastered initially. To test the effectiveness of this strategy, the authors allowed college students in an intermediate algebra course 1 retest of every test on which they had earned a grade less than B. A significant increase in performance between the initial test and retest was found for approximately 90% of the students who had earned a grade less than B on the initial test. Within each group of students eligible to retake a certain number of unit tests, the number of unit tests that they actually retook was correlated with their grade on the final course examination. None of the correlations were statistically significant. Thus, optional retesting appears to affect initial mastery, but not cumulative mastery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信