Kerlinger的研究神话:对教育研究者的启示概述

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
L. Daniel
{"title":"Kerlinger的研究神话:对教育研究者的启示概述","authors":"L. Daniel","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A generation ago, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that there were a number of myths that pervaded educational research. An overview of 3 specific myths—the methods, practicality, and statistics myths—is provided, followed by a discussion about the degree to which these myths have been overcome or still exist in educational research.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kerlinger's Research Myths: An Overview With Implications for Educational Researchers\",\"authors\":\"L. Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A generation ago, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that there were a number of myths that pervaded educational research. An overview of 3 specific myths—the methods, practicality, and statistics myths—is provided, followed by a discussion about the degree to which these myths have been overcome or still exist in educational research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"101-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

一代人以前,Fred N. Kerlinger提出,在教育研究中存在许多神话。本文概述了三种具体的迷思——方法迷思、实用性迷思和统计迷思,然后讨论了这些迷思在教育研究中被克服或仍然存在的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kerlinger's Research Myths: An Overview With Implications for Educational Researchers
Abstract A generation ago, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that there were a number of myths that pervaded educational research. An overview of 3 specific myths—the methods, practicality, and statistics myths—is provided, followed by a discussion about the degree to which these myths have been overcome or still exist in educational research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信