论文质量与克林格方法神话

IF 2.2 4区教育学 Q1 Social Sciences

Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 1996-10-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786

Judith A. Ponticell, A. Olivárez

{"title":"论文质量与克林格方法神话","authors":"Judith A. Ponticell, A. Olivárez","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1960, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that educational research embrace a methods myth regarding the rationale, purpose, and methods of educational research. In this article, the context in which Kerlinger developed his perspectives on educational research, his perceptions of mythology in educational research, and the importance of the methods myth for education dissertations are explored. The authors also posit that underlying Kerlinger's methods myth are two other myths associated with the dissertation: scholarship and quality. Following the discussion of these myths are cautious recommendations for the dissertation research preparation of graduate students in education.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissertation Quality and Kerlinger's Methods Myth\",\"authors\":\"Judith A. Ponticell, A. Olivárez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In 1960, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that educational research embrace a methods myth regarding the rationale, purpose, and methods of educational research. In this article, the context in which Kerlinger developed his perspectives on educational research, his perceptions of mythology in educational research, and the importance of the methods myth for education dissertations are explored. The authors also posit that underlying Kerlinger's methods myth are two other myths associated with the dissertation: scholarship and quality. Following the discussion of these myths are cautious recommendations for the dissertation research preparation of graduate students in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"113-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.9943786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

1960年，Fred N. Kerlinger提出，教育研究包含了一个关于教育研究的基本原理、目的和方法的方法神话。本文探讨了克林格的教育研究观点的形成背景、他对神话在教育研究中的看法以及神话方法对教育论文的重要性。作者还假设，在Kerlinger的方法神话背后，还有另外两个与论文相关的神话:学术和质量。以下讨论这些神话是谨慎的建议，为研究生的论文研究准备教育。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Dissertation Quality and Kerlinger's Methods Myth

Abstract In 1960, Fred N. Kerlinger proposed that educational research embrace a methods myth regarding the rationale, purpose, and methods of educational research. In this article, the context in which Kerlinger developed his perspectives on educational research, his perceptions of mythology in educational research, and the importance of the methods myth for education dissertations are explored. The authors also posit that underlying Kerlinger's methods myth are two other myths associated with the dissertation: scholarship and quality. Following the discussion of these myths are cautious recommendations for the dissertation research preparation of graduate students in education.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Education Multiple-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.