感知教学目标和动机与大学生学习策略使用的关系

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
S. Karabenick, Jan Collins-Eaglin
{"title":"感知教学目标和动机与大学生学习策略使用的关系","authors":"S. Karabenick, Jan Collins-Eaglin","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractClass emphasis on learning goals and incentive structures and their relationship to students’ use of learning strategies were examined. Students in 54 college classes (N = 1,037) rated the perceived importance of mastery and performance goals, and of competitive, individualistic, and cooperative incentive structures. In general, the classes stressed learning course content, individual performance outcomes, and collaboration more than interstudent ability comparisons. The students in classes with greater emphasis on collaboration and less emphasis on grades were more likely to use higher order learning strategies of elaboration and critical thinking. The findings suggest that goals and incentives affect strategy use, although the relationships could have resulted from the instructors’ relative emphasis on goals and incentives and their facilitation of the students’ use of learning strategies.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation of perceived instructional goals and incentives to college students' use of learning strategies\",\"authors\":\"S. Karabenick, Jan Collins-Eaglin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractClass emphasis on learning goals and incentive structures and their relationship to students’ use of learning strategies were examined. Students in 54 college classes (N = 1,037) rated the perceived importance of mastery and performance goals, and of competitive, individualistic, and cooperative incentive structures. In general, the classes stressed learning course content, individual performance outcomes, and collaboration more than interstudent ability comparisons. The students in classes with greater emphasis on collaboration and less emphasis on grades were more likely to use higher order learning strategies of elaboration and critical thinking. The findings suggest that goals and incentives affect strategy use, although the relationships could have resulted from the instructors’ relative emphasis on goals and incentives and their facilitation of the students’ use of learning strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"331-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1997.10806608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

摘要

摘要本文考察了课堂对学习目标和激励结构的重视程度及其与学生学习策略使用的关系。54个大学班级的学生(N = 1037)对掌握和绩效目标以及竞争、个人主义和合作激励结构的感知重要性进行了评分。总的来说,这些课程更强调学习课程内容、个人表现结果和合作,而不是学生之间的能力比较。在更强调合作而不太强调成绩的课堂上,学生更有可能使用更高级的学习策略,如阐述和批判性思维。研究结果表明,目标和激励会影响策略的使用,尽管这种关系可能是由于教师对目标和激励的相对重视以及他们对学生使用学习策略的促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relation of perceived instructional goals and incentives to college students' use of learning strategies
AbstractClass emphasis on learning goals and incentive structures and their relationship to students’ use of learning strategies were examined. Students in 54 college classes (N = 1,037) rated the perceived importance of mastery and performance goals, and of competitive, individualistic, and cooperative incentive structures. In general, the classes stressed learning course content, individual performance outcomes, and collaboration more than interstudent ability comparisons. The students in classes with greater emphasis on collaboration and less emphasis on grades were more likely to use higher order learning strategies of elaboration and critical thinking. The findings suggest that goals and incentives affect strategy use, although the relationships could have resulted from the instructors’ relative emphasis on goals and incentives and their facilitation of the students’ use of learning strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信