{"title":"异方差和/或非正态下双向固定效应ANOVA模型的James二阶检验和单变量F检验的I型错误率和统计能力","authors":"T. Hsiung, S. Olejnik","doi":"10.1080/00220973.1996.9943463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Type I error rates and statistical power for the univariate F test and the James second-order test for comparing population means were estimated for the two-factor fixed-effects completely randomized design. When variances were heterogeneous, the univariate F test was shown to have actual Type I error rates greater than the nominal value even when sample sizes were equal. The James second-order test controlled the Type I error rate under heteroscedasticity when population distributions were normal or platykurtic. However, the James second-order test had increased the Type I error rates when the population distributions were skewed. When variances were homogeneous and distributions were normal, the univariate F test and the James second-order test had similar statistical power for testing main effects, but large power differences favoring the univariate F were found for testing interaction effects.","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"57-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943463","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type I Error Rates and Statistical Power for the James Second-Order Test and the Univariate F Test in Two-Way Fixed-Effects ANOVA Models under Heteroscedasticity and/or Nonnormality.\",\"authors\":\"T. Hsiung, S. Olejnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.1996.9943463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Type I error rates and statistical power for the univariate F test and the James second-order test for comparing population means were estimated for the two-factor fixed-effects completely randomized design. When variances were heterogeneous, the univariate F test was shown to have actual Type I error rates greater than the nominal value even when sample sizes were equal. The James second-order test controlled the Type I error rate under heteroscedasticity when population distributions were normal or platykurtic. However, the James second-order test had increased the Type I error rates when the population distributions were skewed. When variances were homogeneous and distributions were normal, the univariate F test and the James second-order test had similar statistical power for testing main effects, but large power differences favoring the univariate F were found for testing interaction effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"57-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943463\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943463\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Type I Error Rates and Statistical Power for the James Second-Order Test and the Univariate F Test in Two-Way Fixed-Effects ANOVA Models under Heteroscedasticity and/or Nonnormality.
Abstract Type I error rates and statistical power for the univariate F test and the James second-order test for comparing population means were estimated for the two-factor fixed-effects completely randomized design. When variances were heterogeneous, the univariate F test was shown to have actual Type I error rates greater than the nominal value even when sample sizes were equal. The James second-order test controlled the Type I error rate under heteroscedasticity when population distributions were normal or platykurtic. However, the James second-order test had increased the Type I error rates when the population distributions were skewed. When variances were homogeneous and distributions were normal, the univariate F test and the James second-order test had similar statistical power for testing main effects, but large power differences favoring the univariate F were found for testing interaction effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.