织物吸水性和输水性的评价

IF 2.1 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
K. P. Tang, C. Kan, Jintu Fan
{"title":"织物吸水性和输水性的评价","authors":"K. P. Tang, C. Kan, Jintu Fan","doi":"10.1080/00405167.2014.942582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The liquid absorption and transport properties of fabrics are critical not only to the success of wet processes such as dyeing, printing and finishing, but also to the performance of products such as sports clothes, performance clothing, disposable hygiene materials and medical products. During wear, moisture in clothing has been found to be the most significant factor contributing to discomfort. The presence of sweat will increase friction between fabric and skin, trigger a clingy sensation and eventually increase the level of fatigue felt by the wearer. This problem will be even more severe for clothing worn under extreme environmental conditions or at high activity levels. Fabrics with excellent water absorption and transport properties have the potential to minimise the wetness sensation on skin, facilitate the evaporation of sweat and aid comfort. Hence, as a product developer or clothing manufacturer, it is essential to choose the appropriate measurement method to characterise the water absorption and transport properties of fabric. This paper reviews different subjective (by people–subjects) and objective (by instruments–objects) evaluation methods for assessing wetness comfort, and determining water absorption and transport properties of fabrics. Since perception of wetness is a complex process with a number of stimuli from clothing and external environments communicated by human sensory receptors, subjective assessment with its better representation of the real wear situation is preferred. The review starts by introducing human physiology, describing hepatic perception of wetness, followed by methods for use in experiments on assessor control, setting of environmental conditions, types of touch, the usual body sites for testing, and a summary of methods for measuring physiological and perception changes using psychological or psychophysical scaling procedures. Despite its advantage of more closely simulating the real wear condition, performing a subjective test is time-consuming and expensive. Its accuracy depends on the reliability of the assessors and the result may vary between assessors. Objective measurement might therefore provide an attractive alternative. In this study, details of objective instrumental measurements are summarised according to the technology applied, and include gravimetric, observation-based, optical, spectroscopic, electrical, pressure-based, magnetic resonance and temperature detection methods. The principles, advantages and limitations of each method are systematically compared and discussed. Practical recommendations are proposed, particularly for enhancing the accuracy, reproducibility and/or simplicity of the methods. The objective of this review is to present an overview of various measurement methods, both subjective and objective. It is intended to form a basis for enabling fabric engineers to choose the most suitable analytical test method(s) when developing new fabric products with respect to performance, the availability of resources, time for testing, the type of fabrics to be tested and the accuracy and precision required. Additionally, the review points to the need for researchers to develop more advanced and accurate measurement methods to characterise the absorption and transport properties of fabrics.","PeriodicalId":45059,"journal":{"name":"TEXTILE PROGRESS","volume":"46 1","pages":"1 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00405167.2014.942582","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of water absorption and transport property of fabrics\",\"authors\":\"K. P. Tang, C. Kan, Jintu Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00405167.2014.942582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The liquid absorption and transport properties of fabrics are critical not only to the success of wet processes such as dyeing, printing and finishing, but also to the performance of products such as sports clothes, performance clothing, disposable hygiene materials and medical products. During wear, moisture in clothing has been found to be the most significant factor contributing to discomfort. The presence of sweat will increase friction between fabric and skin, trigger a clingy sensation and eventually increase the level of fatigue felt by the wearer. This problem will be even more severe for clothing worn under extreme environmental conditions or at high activity levels. Fabrics with excellent water absorption and transport properties have the potential to minimise the wetness sensation on skin, facilitate the evaporation of sweat and aid comfort. Hence, as a product developer or clothing manufacturer, it is essential to choose the appropriate measurement method to characterise the water absorption and transport properties of fabric. This paper reviews different subjective (by people–subjects) and objective (by instruments–objects) evaluation methods for assessing wetness comfort, and determining water absorption and transport properties of fabrics. Since perception of wetness is a complex process with a number of stimuli from clothing and external environments communicated by human sensory receptors, subjective assessment with its better representation of the real wear situation is preferred. The review starts by introducing human physiology, describing hepatic perception of wetness, followed by methods for use in experiments on assessor control, setting of environmental conditions, types of touch, the usual body sites for testing, and a summary of methods for measuring physiological and perception changes using psychological or psychophysical scaling procedures. Despite its advantage of more closely simulating the real wear condition, performing a subjective test is time-consuming and expensive. Its accuracy depends on the reliability of the assessors and the result may vary between assessors. Objective measurement might therefore provide an attractive alternative. In this study, details of objective instrumental measurements are summarised according to the technology applied, and include gravimetric, observation-based, optical, spectroscopic, electrical, pressure-based, magnetic resonance and temperature detection methods. The principles, advantages and limitations of each method are systematically compared and discussed. Practical recommendations are proposed, particularly for enhancing the accuracy, reproducibility and/or simplicity of the methods. The objective of this review is to present an overview of various measurement methods, both subjective and objective. It is intended to form a basis for enabling fabric engineers to choose the most suitable analytical test method(s) when developing new fabric products with respect to performance, the availability of resources, time for testing, the type of fabrics to be tested and the accuracy and precision required. Additionally, the review points to the need for researchers to develop more advanced and accurate measurement methods to characterise the absorption and transport properties of fabrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXTILE PROGRESS\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00405167.2014.942582\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXTILE PROGRESS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405167.2014.942582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXTILE PROGRESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405167.2014.942582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

织物的液体吸收和传输性能不仅对染色、印刷和整理等湿法工艺的成功至关重要,而且对运动服装、性能服装、一次性卫生材料和医疗产品等产品的性能也至关重要。在穿着过程中,衣物中的水分被发现是导致不舒服的最重要因素。汗液的存在会增加织物和皮肤之间的摩擦,引发粘稠感,最终增加穿着者的疲劳程度。在极端环境条件下或高活动水平下穿的衣服,这个问题会更加严重。具有优异吸水和运输性能的织物有可能最大限度地减少皮肤的湿气,促进汗水的蒸发,帮助舒适。因此,作为产品开发人员或服装制造商,选择合适的测量方法来表征织物的吸水和输送性能是至关重要的。综述了织物湿舒适性的主观评价方法(人-对象)和客观评价方法(仪器-物体),以及织物吸湿和输送性能的测定方法。由于对湿度的感知是一个复杂的过程,由人体感觉受体传达来自衣服和外部环境的许多刺激,因此更能代表真实穿着情况的主观评估是首选。本文首先介绍了人体生理学,描述了肝脏对湿气的感知,然后是在评估者控制实验中使用的方法,环境条件的设置,触摸类型,通常用于测试的身体部位,以及使用心理或心理物理标度程序测量生理和感知变化的方法的总结。尽管它具有更接近模拟真实磨损状况的优点,但进行主观测试既耗时又昂贵。其准确性取决于评估者的可靠性,结果可能因评估者而异。因此,客观测量可能是一个有吸引力的选择。在本研究中,根据所应用的技术,总结了客观仪器测量的细节,包括重力、观测、光学、光谱、电学、压力、磁共振和温度检测方法。对各种方法的原理、优点和局限性进行了系统的比较和讨论。提出了切实可行的建议,特别是提高方法的准确性、可重复性和/或简单性。这篇综述的目的是对各种主观和客观的测量方法进行概述。它旨在为面料工程师在开发新面料产品时选择最合适的分析测试方法提供基础,这些分析测试方法涉及性能、资源可用性、测试时间、待测试面料类型以及所需的准确性和精密度。此外,该综述指出,研究人员需要开发更先进和准确的测量方法来表征织物的吸收和传输特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of water absorption and transport property of fabrics
The liquid absorption and transport properties of fabrics are critical not only to the success of wet processes such as dyeing, printing and finishing, but also to the performance of products such as sports clothes, performance clothing, disposable hygiene materials and medical products. During wear, moisture in clothing has been found to be the most significant factor contributing to discomfort. The presence of sweat will increase friction between fabric and skin, trigger a clingy sensation and eventually increase the level of fatigue felt by the wearer. This problem will be even more severe for clothing worn under extreme environmental conditions or at high activity levels. Fabrics with excellent water absorption and transport properties have the potential to minimise the wetness sensation on skin, facilitate the evaporation of sweat and aid comfort. Hence, as a product developer or clothing manufacturer, it is essential to choose the appropriate measurement method to characterise the water absorption and transport properties of fabric. This paper reviews different subjective (by people–subjects) and objective (by instruments–objects) evaluation methods for assessing wetness comfort, and determining water absorption and transport properties of fabrics. Since perception of wetness is a complex process with a number of stimuli from clothing and external environments communicated by human sensory receptors, subjective assessment with its better representation of the real wear situation is preferred. The review starts by introducing human physiology, describing hepatic perception of wetness, followed by methods for use in experiments on assessor control, setting of environmental conditions, types of touch, the usual body sites for testing, and a summary of methods for measuring physiological and perception changes using psychological or psychophysical scaling procedures. Despite its advantage of more closely simulating the real wear condition, performing a subjective test is time-consuming and expensive. Its accuracy depends on the reliability of the assessors and the result may vary between assessors. Objective measurement might therefore provide an attractive alternative. In this study, details of objective instrumental measurements are summarised according to the technology applied, and include gravimetric, observation-based, optical, spectroscopic, electrical, pressure-based, magnetic resonance and temperature detection methods. The principles, advantages and limitations of each method are systematically compared and discussed. Practical recommendations are proposed, particularly for enhancing the accuracy, reproducibility and/or simplicity of the methods. The objective of this review is to present an overview of various measurement methods, both subjective and objective. It is intended to form a basis for enabling fabric engineers to choose the most suitable analytical test method(s) when developing new fabric products with respect to performance, the availability of resources, time for testing, the type of fabrics to be tested and the accuracy and precision required. Additionally, the review points to the need for researchers to develop more advanced and accurate measurement methods to characterise the absorption and transport properties of fabrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEXTILE PROGRESS
TEXTILE PROGRESS MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信