Brooks A. Kohli, Reymond J. Miyajima, Marta A. Jarzyna
{"title":"湿润山区和干旱山区啮齿动物海拔多样性格局存在差异","authors":"Brooks A. Kohli, Reymond J. Miyajima, Marta A. Jarzyna","doi":"10.1111/geb.13552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Patterns of species richness along elevation gradients vary with geographic and environmental factors but evidence for similar variation in functional and phylogenetic diversity remains scarce. Here, we provide the most comprehensive evaluation to date of elevational gradients in taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of rodents – one of the most ecologically diverse groups of mammals – and test the effects of latitude and aridity on their variation for the first time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-nine mountains on five continents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time period</h3>\n \n <p>Contemporary.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major taxa studied</h3>\n \n <p>Rodents (Rodentia).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compiled elevational distributions of 374 rodent species across 49 elevational gradients. For each gradient, we quantified – in 100-m elevational bins – rodent species richness and functional and phylogenetic richness, evenness, and dispersion, and their species richness-corrected equivalents. To assess how rodent diversity varies with elevation, we fitted a series of models that included elevation, average latitude, and aridity of each mountain system while accounting for variation in study design and sampling effort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A common mid-elevational peak in species richness among mountains contrasts with functional and phylogenetic diversity pattern variation (model shape and slope) explained by the aridity at a mountain's base. Specifically, we find that functional and phylogenetic richness and dispersion decline with elevation in wet mountain systems but increase with elevation in arid mountains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this first comparative analysis of mammal functional and phylogenetic elevational gradients, we find that the decoupling of each from species richness is particularly pronounced in arid regions. Wet-mountain lowlands and arid-mountain highlands harbour the most functionally and phylogenetically diverse rodent communities, indicating that water availability is a strong environmental filter in structuring diversity of small mammals on mountain gradients. High regularity of species distances within assemblages supports a constant role for competition across all elevations and niche expansion in elevations with greater species richness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"31 9","pages":"1726-1740"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevational diversity patterns of rodents differ between wet and arid mountains\",\"authors\":\"Brooks A. Kohli, Reymond J. Miyajima, Marta A. Jarzyna\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patterns of species richness along elevation gradients vary with geographic and environmental factors but evidence for similar variation in functional and phylogenetic diversity remains scarce. Here, we provide the most comprehensive evaluation to date of elevational gradients in taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of rodents – one of the most ecologically diverse groups of mammals – and test the effects of latitude and aridity on their variation for the first time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-nine mountains on five continents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Contemporary.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major taxa studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rodents (Rodentia).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We compiled elevational distributions of 374 rodent species across 49 elevational gradients. For each gradient, we quantified – in 100-m elevational bins – rodent species richness and functional and phylogenetic richness, evenness, and dispersion, and their species richness-corrected equivalents. To assess how rodent diversity varies with elevation, we fitted a series of models that included elevation, average latitude, and aridity of each mountain system while accounting for variation in study design and sampling effort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A common mid-elevational peak in species richness among mountains contrasts with functional and phylogenetic diversity pattern variation (model shape and slope) explained by the aridity at a mountain's base. Specifically, we find that functional and phylogenetic richness and dispersion decline with elevation in wet mountain systems but increase with elevation in arid mountains.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this first comparative analysis of mammal functional and phylogenetic elevational gradients, we find that the decoupling of each from species richness is particularly pronounced in arid regions. Wet-mountain lowlands and arid-mountain highlands harbour the most functionally and phylogenetically diverse rodent communities, indicating that water availability is a strong environmental filter in structuring diversity of small mammals on mountain gradients. High regularity of species distances within assemblages supports a constant role for competition across all elevations and niche expansion in elevations with greater species richness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"1726-1740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13552\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Elevational diversity patterns of rodents differ between wet and arid mountains
Aim
Patterns of species richness along elevation gradients vary with geographic and environmental factors but evidence for similar variation in functional and phylogenetic diversity remains scarce. Here, we provide the most comprehensive evaluation to date of elevational gradients in taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of rodents – one of the most ecologically diverse groups of mammals – and test the effects of latitude and aridity on their variation for the first time.
Location
Forty-nine mountains on five continents.
Time period
Contemporary.
Major taxa studied
Rodents (Rodentia).
Methods
We compiled elevational distributions of 374 rodent species across 49 elevational gradients. For each gradient, we quantified – in 100-m elevational bins – rodent species richness and functional and phylogenetic richness, evenness, and dispersion, and their species richness-corrected equivalents. To assess how rodent diversity varies with elevation, we fitted a series of models that included elevation, average latitude, and aridity of each mountain system while accounting for variation in study design and sampling effort.
Results
A common mid-elevational peak in species richness among mountains contrasts with functional and phylogenetic diversity pattern variation (model shape and slope) explained by the aridity at a mountain's base. Specifically, we find that functional and phylogenetic richness and dispersion decline with elevation in wet mountain systems but increase with elevation in arid mountains.
Main conclusions
In this first comparative analysis of mammal functional and phylogenetic elevational gradients, we find that the decoupling of each from species richness is particularly pronounced in arid regions. Wet-mountain lowlands and arid-mountain highlands harbour the most functionally and phylogenetically diverse rodent communities, indicating that water availability is a strong environmental filter in structuring diversity of small mammals on mountain gradients. High regularity of species distances within assemblages supports a constant role for competition across all elevations and niche expansion in elevations with greater species richness.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.