同传译员在译语输出中与源语相关的错误重音放置

IF 1.8 1区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Interpreting Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK

Mária Bakti, J. Bóna

{"title":"同传译员在译语输出中与源语相关的错误重音放置","authors":"Mária Bakti, J. Bóna","doi":"10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Erroneous stress placement (ESP) in the target language is one of the salient suprasegmental features of simultaneously interpreted texts. This paper investigates the phenomenon in simultaneous interpretation from English, a free stress language, into Hungarian, a fixed stress language, the aim being to ascertain whether ESPs are related to source language features. Analysis of an experimental corpus collected for an earlier study (Bona & Bakti 2009) made it possible to identify 122 ESPs, divided into two categories: (a) related to source language features; (b) others. These categories were further divided into several subcategories. Thus, (a) included ESPs related to: (i) source language stress, with semantic correspondence between the source language and target language units concerned; (ii) source language stress, but with no semantic correspondence between the target language unit and the prosodically similar source language unit identified in relatively close proximity to it. For (b), the subcategories distinguished between ESPs related to: (iii) the phonetic target language context; (iv) translation problems; (v) individual speech characteristics. Our results provide support for the view that metrical planning and segmental planning are separate processes. Thus, successful inhibition of source language interference on the segmental level during simultaneous interpreting is not necessarily associated with suppression of suprasegmental level source language interference.","PeriodicalId":51746,"journal":{"name":"Interpreting","volume":"16 1","pages":"34-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source language-related erroneous stress placement in the target language output of simultaneous interpreters\",\"authors\":\"Mária Bakti, J. Bóna\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Erroneous stress placement (ESP) in the target language is one of the salient suprasegmental features of simultaneously interpreted texts. This paper investigates the phenomenon in simultaneous interpretation from English, a free stress language, into Hungarian, a fixed stress language, the aim being to ascertain whether ESPs are related to source language features. Analysis of an experimental corpus collected for an earlier study (Bona & Bakti 2009) made it possible to identify 122 ESPs, divided into two categories: (a) related to source language features; (b) others. These categories were further divided into several subcategories. Thus, (a) included ESPs related to: (i) source language stress, with semantic correspondence between the source language and target language units concerned; (ii) source language stress, but with no semantic correspondence between the target language unit and the prosodically similar source language unit identified in relatively close proximity to it. For (b), the subcategories distinguished between ESPs related to: (iii) the phonetic target language context; (iv) translation problems; (v) individual speech characteristics. Our results provide support for the view that metrical planning and segmental planning are separate processes. Thus, successful inhibition of source language interference on the segmental level during simultaneous interpreting is not necessarily associated with suppression of suprasegmental level source language interference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interpreting\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"34-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interpreting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpreting","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/INTP.16.1.03BAK","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

译语中的错误重音放置是同传语篇的显著的超语段特征之一。本文研究了英语这一自由重音语言与匈牙利语这一固定重音语言的同声传译现象，目的是确定英语中esp是否与源语特征有关。对早期研究(Bona & Bakti 2009)收集的实验语料库进行分析，可以识别122个esp，分为两类:(a)与源语言特征相关;(b)。这些类别又进一步分为几个小类别。因此，(a)包括与以下方面相关的esp:(i)源语重音，涉及源语和目标语单位之间的语义对应;(ii)源语重音，但目标语单元与相对接近的韵律相似的源语单元之间没有语义对应关系。对于(b)，不同esp之间的子类别与以下方面有关:(iii)语音目标语言语境;(四)翻译问题;(五)个体言语特征。我们的结果为测量规划和分段规划是分开的过程的观点提供了支持。因此，在同声传译过程中，成功抑制语段水平的源语干扰并不一定与抑制超语段水平的源语干扰有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Source language-related erroneous stress placement in the target language output of simultaneous interpreters

Erroneous stress placement (ESP) in the target language is one of the salient suprasegmental features of simultaneously interpreted texts. This paper investigates the phenomenon in simultaneous interpretation from English, a free stress language, into Hungarian, a fixed stress language, the aim being to ascertain whether ESPs are related to source language features. Analysis of an experimental corpus collected for an earlier study (Bona & Bakti 2009) made it possible to identify 122 ESPs, divided into two categories: (a) related to source language features; (b) others. These categories were further divided into several subcategories. Thus, (a) included ESPs related to: (i) source language stress, with semantic correspondence between the source language and target language units concerned; (ii) source language stress, but with no semantic correspondence between the target language unit and the prosodically similar source language unit identified in relatively close proximity to it. For (b), the subcategories distinguished between ESPs related to: (iii) the phonetic target language context; (iv) translation problems; (v) individual speech characteristics. Our results provide support for the view that metrical planning and segmental planning are separate processes. Thus, successful inhibition of source language interference on the segmental level during simultaneous interpreting is not necessarily associated with suppression of suprasegmental level source language interference.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Interpreting Multiple-

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

15.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Interpreting serves as a medium for research and debate on all aspects of interpreting, in its various modes, modalities (spoken and signed) and settings (conferences, media, courtroom, healthcare and others). Striving to promote our understanding of the socio-cultural, cognitive and linguistic dimensions of interpreting as an activity and process, the journal covers theoretical and methodological concerns, explores the history and professional ecology of interpreting and its role in society, and addresses current issues in professional practice and training.