危机中的工程:观察学生在流行病和自然灾害期间对宏观伦理责任的看法

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
M. LaPatin, Sara Barrens, C. Poleacovschi, B. Vaziri, Lauryn A. Spearing, Kate Padgett-Walsh, S. Feinstein, C. Rutherford, L. Nguyen, K. Faust
{"title":"危机中的工程:观察学生在流行病和自然灾害期间对宏观伦理责任的看法","authors":"M. LaPatin, Sara Barrens, C. Poleacovschi, B. Vaziri, Lauryn A. Spearing, Kate Padgett-Walsh, S. Feinstein, C. Rutherford, L. Nguyen, K. Faust","doi":"10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the ethical responsibilities of engineers are discussed in classrooms, the focus is usually on microethics, which concentrates on individual decision-making, rather than macroethics, that addresses broad societal concerns. Pandemics (e.g., COVID-19) and natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, derechos) have presented unique opportunities to observe engineering macroethical responsibilities, because unjust social, economic, and environmental systems have been brought to the forefront amidst the responses (e.g., inequitable transportation access). In this paper, we consider pandemics and natural disasters through the lens of engineering macroethics, aiming to understand students' perceptions about the macroethical responsibilities of engineers. In the fall of 2020, we deployed a survey to undergraduate engineering students at two universities (n=424). Students were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the role of engineering professionals in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters. We used a qualitative content analysis to explore the macroethical responsibilities mentioned in students' responses. Many of these responses include considerations of infrastructure resilience, resource distribution, and community equity. Logit models were used to identify which sociodemographic factors were associated with responses that included macroethical responsibilities, revealing engineering major (specifically, civil engineering), employment status, gender identity, and family size, among others as significant factors. The implications from this study include recommendations on curricular content, and identifying which student sociodemographic groups would especially benefit from macroethical content in coursework. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":48476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering in a Crisis: Observing Students’ Perceptions of Macroethical Responsibilities during Pandemics and Natural Disasters\",\"authors\":\"M. LaPatin, Sara Barrens, C. Poleacovschi, B. Vaziri, Lauryn A. Spearing, Kate Padgett-Walsh, S. Feinstein, C. Rutherford, L. Nguyen, K. Faust\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When the ethical responsibilities of engineers are discussed in classrooms, the focus is usually on microethics, which concentrates on individual decision-making, rather than macroethics, that addresses broad societal concerns. Pandemics (e.g., COVID-19) and natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, derechos) have presented unique opportunities to observe engineering macroethical responsibilities, because unjust social, economic, and environmental systems have been brought to the forefront amidst the responses (e.g., inequitable transportation access). In this paper, we consider pandemics and natural disasters through the lens of engineering macroethics, aiming to understand students' perceptions about the macroethical responsibilities of engineers. In the fall of 2020, we deployed a survey to undergraduate engineering students at two universities (n=424). Students were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the role of engineering professionals in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters. We used a qualitative content analysis to explore the macroethical responsibilities mentioned in students' responses. Many of these responses include considerations of infrastructure resilience, resource distribution, and community equity. Logit models were used to identify which sociodemographic factors were associated with responses that included macroethical responsibilities, revealing engineering major (specifically, civil engineering), employment status, gender identity, and family size, among others as significant factors. The implications from this study include recommendations on curricular content, and identifying which student sociodemographic groups would especially benefit from macroethical content in coursework. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1909\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jceecd.eieng-1909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当在课堂上讨论工程师的道德责任时,重点通常放在微观伦理上,这集中在个人决策上,而不是宏观伦理,这解决了广泛的社会问题。大流行病(如COVID-19)和自然灾害(如飓风、大回声)为观察工程宏观伦理责任提供了独特的机会,因为不公正的社会、经济和环境系统在应对措施(如交通运输不公平)中被置于最前沿。在本文中,我们通过工程宏观伦理学的视角来考虑流行病和自然灾害,旨在了解学生对工程师宏观伦理责任的看法。在2020年秋季,我们对两所大学的工科本科生进行了一项调查(n=424)。学生们被要求讨论他们认为工程专业人员在应对全球COVID-19大流行和自然灾害方面的作用。我们使用定性内容分析来探讨学生回答中提到的宏观伦理责任。其中许多应对措施包括对基础设施弹性、资源分配和社区公平的考虑。使用Logit模型来确定哪些社会人口因素与包括宏观伦理责任、揭示工程专业(特别是土木工程)、就业状况、性别认同和家庭规模在内的重要因素相关。本研究的意义包括对课程内容的建议,并确定哪些学生社会人口统计学群体将特别受益于课程中的宏观伦理内容。©2023美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering in a Crisis: Observing Students’ Perceptions of Macroethical Responsibilities during Pandemics and Natural Disasters
When the ethical responsibilities of engineers are discussed in classrooms, the focus is usually on microethics, which concentrates on individual decision-making, rather than macroethics, that addresses broad societal concerns. Pandemics (e.g., COVID-19) and natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, derechos) have presented unique opportunities to observe engineering macroethical responsibilities, because unjust social, economic, and environmental systems have been brought to the forefront amidst the responses (e.g., inequitable transportation access). In this paper, we consider pandemics and natural disasters through the lens of engineering macroethics, aiming to understand students' perceptions about the macroethical responsibilities of engineers. In the fall of 2020, we deployed a survey to undergraduate engineering students at two universities (n=424). Students were asked to discuss what they perceived to be the role of engineering professionals in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters. We used a qualitative content analysis to explore the macroethical responsibilities mentioned in students' responses. Many of these responses include considerations of infrastructure resilience, resource distribution, and community equity. Logit models were used to identify which sociodemographic factors were associated with responses that included macroethical responsibilities, revealing engineering major (specifically, civil engineering), employment status, gender identity, and family size, among others as significant factors. The implications from this study include recommendations on curricular content, and identifying which student sociodemographic groups would especially benefit from macroethical content in coursework. © 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信