儿童创伤成年幸存者的精神疾病发病率。

N. Breslau
{"title":"儿童创伤成年幸存者的精神疾病发病率。","authors":"N. Breslau","doi":"10.1053/SCNP.2002.31780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review focuses on child sexual abuse (CSA) as a prototype of childhood trauma and evaluates the evidence on psychiatric morbidity in adult survivors. An association between CSA and a wide range of psychiatric morbidity has been consistently documented in general population studies. The interpretation of this observed association is fraught with uncertainty that stems primarily from: (1) the retrospective nature of the data on CSA from adults' reports on their early experiences; (2) the adverse family context in which it occurs, which presents a major challenge for evaluating the effect of CSA per se; (3) the well documented lifetime comorbidity among psychiatric disorders, which leaves open questions about the specificity of CSA outcomes in adulthood. Twin study methods offer a solution to the problem of the familial context of CSA. Ascertainment of age of onset of adult disorders in future studies would increase the utility of findings for formulating psychological and biological causal models on the CSA-adult disorders connection. However, the retrospective nature of data on child abuse, because of legal and ethical restraints on research on children, is a formidable obstacle to advancing knowledge in this field.","PeriodicalId":79723,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry","volume":"7 2 1","pages":"80-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychiatric morbidity in adult survivors of childhood trauma.\",\"authors\":\"N. Breslau\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/SCNP.2002.31780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review focuses on child sexual abuse (CSA) as a prototype of childhood trauma and evaluates the evidence on psychiatric morbidity in adult survivors. An association between CSA and a wide range of psychiatric morbidity has been consistently documented in general population studies. The interpretation of this observed association is fraught with uncertainty that stems primarily from: (1) the retrospective nature of the data on CSA from adults' reports on their early experiences; (2) the adverse family context in which it occurs, which presents a major challenge for evaluating the effect of CSA per se; (3) the well documented lifetime comorbidity among psychiatric disorders, which leaves open questions about the specificity of CSA outcomes in adulthood. Twin study methods offer a solution to the problem of the familial context of CSA. Ascertainment of age of onset of adult disorders in future studies would increase the utility of findings for formulating psychological and biological causal models on the CSA-adult disorders connection. However, the retrospective nature of data on child abuse, because of legal and ethical restraints on research on children, is a formidable obstacle to advancing knowledge in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"7 2 1\",\"pages\":\"80-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/SCNP.2002.31780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in clinical neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SCNP.2002.31780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

这篇综述的重点是儿童性虐待(CSA)作为童年创伤的原型,并评估成年幸存者的精神疾病发病率的证据。在一般人群研究中,CSA与广泛的精神疾病发病率之间的关联已得到一致的证明。对这种观察到的关联的解释充满了不确定性,主要源于:(1)来自成人早期经历报告的CSA数据的回顾性;(2)不良的家庭环境,这是评估CSA本身效果的主要挑战;(3)精神疾病的终生共病,这给成年期CSA结果的特异性留下了开放性问题。双生子研究方法为CSA的家族背景问题提供了一个解决方案。在未来的研究中,确定成人疾病的发病年龄将增加研究结果的效用,以形成csa -成人疾病联系的心理和生物学因果模型。然而,由于法律和伦理对儿童研究的限制,关于虐待儿童的数据具有追溯性,这是推进这一领域知识的巨大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychiatric morbidity in adult survivors of childhood trauma.
This review focuses on child sexual abuse (CSA) as a prototype of childhood trauma and evaluates the evidence on psychiatric morbidity in adult survivors. An association between CSA and a wide range of psychiatric morbidity has been consistently documented in general population studies. The interpretation of this observed association is fraught with uncertainty that stems primarily from: (1) the retrospective nature of the data on CSA from adults' reports on their early experiences; (2) the adverse family context in which it occurs, which presents a major challenge for evaluating the effect of CSA per se; (3) the well documented lifetime comorbidity among psychiatric disorders, which leaves open questions about the specificity of CSA outcomes in adulthood. Twin study methods offer a solution to the problem of the familial context of CSA. Ascertainment of age of onset of adult disorders in future studies would increase the utility of findings for formulating psychological and biological causal models on the CSA-adult disorders connection. However, the retrospective nature of data on child abuse, because of legal and ethical restraints on research on children, is a formidable obstacle to advancing knowledge in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信