跑酷运动员对立定跳远距离的适应是通过起跳前和起跳中特定变量的调节来实现的

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Grosprêtre, P. Ufland, Daniel Jecker
{"title":"跑酷运动员对立定跳远距离的适应是通过起跳前和起跳中特定变量的调节来实现的","authors":"S. Grosprêtre, P. Ufland, Daniel Jecker","doi":"10.1051/SM/2017022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed at investigating different variables that can be manipulated prior to and during take-off, to execute a specific standing long jump (SLJ) distance, according to jump expertise in parkour practitioners (= traceurs). Fourteen healthy young traceurs were included and separated into two groups: beginners (BEG) and experts (EXP). Firstly, classical vertical jump battery was used to characterize participants arm use and leg efficiency. Secondly, standing long jump (SLJ) performances were analyzed at four distances: 70, 80, 90, and 100% of each participant’s maximal SLJ distance. The force-time curves of the ground reaction forces (GRF) and the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory were measured with a force platform during the jump impulses. Take-off speed, angle and jump trajectory were estimated. For all of the participants, take-off speed and angle, power output, and vertical GRF during jump preparation (counter movement) varied with distance. The EXP group exhibited greater backward CoP excursion, greater arm participation, greater take-off velocity and a greater modulation of take-off angle than BEG group. When comparing jumps of similar distance, EXP exhibited a more curvilinear trajectory with a higher peak than BEG. To conclude, different motor strategies can be adopted based on the jump distance, and these strategies can evolve as parkour experience increases.","PeriodicalId":52082,"journal":{"name":"Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite","volume":"1 1","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/SM/2017022","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The adaptation to standing long jump distance in parkour is performed by the modulation of specific variables prior and during take-off\",\"authors\":\"S. Grosprêtre, P. Ufland, Daniel Jecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/SM/2017022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aimed at investigating different variables that can be manipulated prior to and during take-off, to execute a specific standing long jump (SLJ) distance, according to jump expertise in parkour practitioners (= traceurs). Fourteen healthy young traceurs were included and separated into two groups: beginners (BEG) and experts (EXP). Firstly, classical vertical jump battery was used to characterize participants arm use and leg efficiency. Secondly, standing long jump (SLJ) performances were analyzed at four distances: 70, 80, 90, and 100% of each participant’s maximal SLJ distance. The force-time curves of the ground reaction forces (GRF) and the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory were measured with a force platform during the jump impulses. Take-off speed, angle and jump trajectory were estimated. For all of the participants, take-off speed and angle, power output, and vertical GRF during jump preparation (counter movement) varied with distance. The EXP group exhibited greater backward CoP excursion, greater arm participation, greater take-off velocity and a greater modulation of take-off angle than BEG group. When comparing jumps of similar distance, EXP exhibited a more curvilinear trajectory with a higher peak than BEG. To conclude, different motor strategies can be adopted based on the jump distance, and these strategies can evolve as parkour experience increases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"27-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1051/SM/2017022\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/SM/2017022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/SM/2017022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究的目的是调查不同的变量,可以在起飞之前和期间进行操纵,以执行特定的立定跳远(SLJ)距离,根据跑酷练习者(=跟踪者)的跳跃专业知识。选取14名健康青少年田径运动员,分为初学者组(BEG)和专家组(EXP)。首先,采用经典垂直跳跃模型对参与者的手臂使用和腿部效率进行表征。其次,对立定跳远(SLJ)在70%、80%、90%和100%的最大距离下的表现进行分析。利用力平台测量了弹跳冲击过程中地面反作用力(GRF)和压力中心轨迹(CoP)的力-时曲线。估计了起飞速度、角度和起跳轨迹。对于所有的参与者来说,起跳的速度和角度,力量输出和垂直GRF在起跳准备(反动作)期间随距离而变化。与BEG组相比,EXP组表现出更大的反向CoP偏移、更大的手臂参与、更大的起飞速度和更大的起飞角度调制。在比较相似距离的跳跃时,EXP比BEG表现出更曲线的轨迹,峰值更高。总之,可以根据跳跃距离采取不同的运动策略,这些策略可以随着跑酷经验的增加而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The adaptation to standing long jump distance in parkour is performed by the modulation of specific variables prior and during take-off
The present study aimed at investigating different variables that can be manipulated prior to and during take-off, to execute a specific standing long jump (SLJ) distance, according to jump expertise in parkour practitioners (= traceurs). Fourteen healthy young traceurs were included and separated into two groups: beginners (BEG) and experts (EXP). Firstly, classical vertical jump battery was used to characterize participants arm use and leg efficiency. Secondly, standing long jump (SLJ) performances were analyzed at four distances: 70, 80, 90, and 100% of each participant’s maximal SLJ distance. The force-time curves of the ground reaction forces (GRF) and the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory were measured with a force platform during the jump impulses. Take-off speed, angle and jump trajectory were estimated. For all of the participants, take-off speed and angle, power output, and vertical GRF during jump preparation (counter movement) varied with distance. The EXP group exhibited greater backward CoP excursion, greater arm participation, greater take-off velocity and a greater modulation of take-off angle than BEG group. When comparing jumps of similar distance, EXP exhibited a more curvilinear trajectory with a higher peak than BEG. To conclude, different motor strategies can be adopted based on the jump distance, and these strategies can evolve as parkour experience increases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite
Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité is a peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of the French Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences (ACAPS). The journal publishes scientific articles related to human movement, physical activity, rehabilitation, sport and performance in a multidisciplinary perspective. All scientific disciplines are represented: physiology, biomecanics, neuroscience, motor control, psychology, sociology, management, history, epistemology. Fundamental, empirical and more applied or technological approaches are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信