做纲领性研究:来自社会心理学的两个案例研究

B. Randolph-Seng
{"title":"做纲领性研究:来自社会心理学的两个案例研究","authors":"B. Randolph-Seng","doi":"10.1037/e741562011-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a new researcher, transferring knowledge of the scientific process into an actual contribution to that process can be difficult. The purpose of this article is to first demonstrate how a deductive vs. inductive approach can be implemented in a program of research, and second to provide insights on using each approach in the science of psychology. Specifically, the histories of Michael A. Hogg's and John A. Bargh's programmatic research will be traced, followed by a critical comparison of each method. Finally, insights on doing programmatic research in psychology will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":30144,"journal":{"name":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":"73-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing Programmatic Research: Two Case Studies from Social Psychology\",\"authors\":\"B. Randolph-Seng\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e741562011-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a new researcher, transferring knowledge of the scientific process into an actual contribution to that process can be difficult. The purpose of this article is to first demonstrate how a deductive vs. inductive approach can be implemented in a program of research, and second to provide insights on using each approach in the science of psychology. Specifically, the histories of Michael A. Hogg's and John A. Bargh's programmatic research will be traced, followed by a critical comparison of each method. Finally, insights on doing programmatic research in psychology will be discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"73-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The New School Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741562011-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New School Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e741562011-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

作为一名新的研究人员,将科学过程的知识转化为对该过程的实际贡献可能很困难。本文的目的首先是演示演绎与归纳方法如何在研究项目中实施,其次是提供在心理学科学中使用每种方法的见解。具体来说,我们将追溯Michael a . Hogg和John a . Bargh的纲领性研究的历史,然后对每种方法进行批判性的比较。最后,将讨论在心理学中进行程序化研究的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Doing Programmatic Research: Two Case Studies from Social Psychology
As a new researcher, transferring knowledge of the scientific process into an actual contribution to that process can be difficult. The purpose of this article is to first demonstrate how a deductive vs. inductive approach can be implemented in a program of research, and second to provide insights on using each approach in the science of psychology. Specifically, the histories of Michael A. Hogg's and John A. Bargh's programmatic research will be traced, followed by a critical comparison of each method. Finally, insights on doing programmatic research in psychology will be discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信