两种单品种白葡萄酒在不同抗氧化环境下的瓶中挥发特性研究

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Cátia V. Almeida Santos, M. G. D. da Silva, M. Cabrita
{"title":"两种单品种白葡萄酒在不同抗氧化环境下的瓶中挥发特性研究","authors":"Cátia V. Almeida Santos, M. G. D. da Silva, M. Cabrita","doi":"10.1051/ctv/ctv20223701039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) formed during winemaking can be modulated by several additives, namely by the use of sulphur dioxide (SO2) which has been well-accepted on winemaking as a preservative agent. However, some drawbacks associated with SO2 wine application led to the need to reduce or replace its use. In this work, VOCs profile after storage in bottle under different antioxidant conditions of two Portuguese monovarietal wines (‘Arinto’ and ‘Síria’) was studied. Wines were obtained by different winemaking environments (0, 50, 100 mg/L of SO2 and 100 mg/L ascorbic acid for ‘Síria’ and 15, 30, 45 mg/L of SO2 and 100 mg/L of ascorbic acid for ‘Arinto’ both with and without bentonite). After alcoholic fermentation, a second SO2 treatment was applied: 0 and 60 mg/L of SO2 to ‘Arinto’ wines and 30 and 60 mg/L of SO2 to ‘Síria’ wines. Wines were kept over lees for three months, bottled and analysed after three months in bottle. The VOCs present were analysed by HS-SPME-GC/MS six months after fermentation. The maturation conditions did not influence the evolution of free and total SO2. Regarding the VOCs profile evolution, the ANOVA analysis showed that esters are the most important group, presenting significant differences among samples. Through the PCA analysis, using wines after fermentation as reference, 74.13 % and 54.92 % of the variation were explained by the first two principal components for ‘Arinto’ and ‘Síria’, respectively. VOCs profile evolution of wines seems to be mainly influenced by the fermentation conditions.","PeriodicalId":54244,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volatile profile of two monovarietal white wines under different antioxidant environments during storage in bottle\",\"authors\":\"Cátia V. Almeida Santos, M. G. D. da Silva, M. Cabrita\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ctv/ctv20223701039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) formed during winemaking can be modulated by several additives, namely by the use of sulphur dioxide (SO2) which has been well-accepted on winemaking as a preservative agent. However, some drawbacks associated with SO2 wine application led to the need to reduce or replace its use. In this work, VOCs profile after storage in bottle under different antioxidant conditions of two Portuguese monovarietal wines (‘Arinto’ and ‘Síria’) was studied. Wines were obtained by different winemaking environments (0, 50, 100 mg/L of SO2 and 100 mg/L ascorbic acid for ‘Síria’ and 15, 30, 45 mg/L of SO2 and 100 mg/L of ascorbic acid for ‘Arinto’ both with and without bentonite). After alcoholic fermentation, a second SO2 treatment was applied: 0 and 60 mg/L of SO2 to ‘Arinto’ wines and 30 and 60 mg/L of SO2 to ‘Síria’ wines. Wines were kept over lees for three months, bottled and analysed after three months in bottle. The VOCs present were analysed by HS-SPME-GC/MS six months after fermentation. The maturation conditions did not influence the evolution of free and total SO2. Regarding the VOCs profile evolution, the ANOVA analysis showed that esters are the most important group, presenting significant differences among samples. Through the PCA analysis, using wines after fermentation as reference, 74.13 % and 54.92 % of the variation were explained by the first two principal components for ‘Arinto’ and ‘Síria’, respectively. VOCs profile evolution of wines seems to be mainly influenced by the fermentation conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20223701039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20223701039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

葡萄酒酿造过程中形成的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)可以通过几种添加剂来调节,即使用二氧化硫(SO2),二氧化硫在葡萄酒酿造中被广泛接受为防腐剂。然而,与SO2葡萄酒应用相关的一些缺点导致需要减少或替换它的使用。本文研究了两种葡萄牙单品种葡萄酒(Arinto和Síria)在不同抗氧化条件下的瓶中贮存后的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)分布。通过不同的酿酒环境(' Síria '用0、50、100 mg/L的SO2和100 mg/L的抗坏血酸,' Arinto '用15、30、45 mg/L的SO2和100 mg/L的抗坏血酸,加和不加膨润土)得到葡萄酒。酒精发酵后,第二次SO2处理应用:0和60mg /L的SO2用于' Arinto '葡萄酒,30和60mg /L的SO2用于' Síria '葡萄酒。葡萄酒在酒糟中保存三个月,装瓶并在三个月后装入瓶中进行分析。发酵6个月后,采用HS-SPME-GC/MS分析挥发性有机化合物。成熟条件对游离SO2和总SO2的演化没有影响。对于VOCs的分布演变,方差分析显示,酯类是最重要的一类,样品之间存在显著差异。通过主成分分析,以发酵后的葡萄酒为参照,Arinto和Síria的前两个主成分分别解释了74.13%和54.92%的变异。葡萄酒挥发性有机化合物谱的演变主要受发酵条件的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volatile profile of two monovarietal white wines under different antioxidant environments during storage in bottle
The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) formed during winemaking can be modulated by several additives, namely by the use of sulphur dioxide (SO2) which has been well-accepted on winemaking as a preservative agent. However, some drawbacks associated with SO2 wine application led to the need to reduce or replace its use. In this work, VOCs profile after storage in bottle under different antioxidant conditions of two Portuguese monovarietal wines (‘Arinto’ and ‘Síria’) was studied. Wines were obtained by different winemaking environments (0, 50, 100 mg/L of SO2 and 100 mg/L ascorbic acid for ‘Síria’ and 15, 30, 45 mg/L of SO2 and 100 mg/L of ascorbic acid for ‘Arinto’ both with and without bentonite). After alcoholic fermentation, a second SO2 treatment was applied: 0 and 60 mg/L of SO2 to ‘Arinto’ wines and 30 and 60 mg/L of SO2 to ‘Síria’ wines. Wines were kept over lees for three months, bottled and analysed after three months in bottle. The VOCs present were analysed by HS-SPME-GC/MS six months after fermentation. The maturation conditions did not influence the evolution of free and total SO2. Regarding the VOCs profile evolution, the ANOVA analysis showed that esters are the most important group, presenting significant differences among samples. Through the PCA analysis, using wines after fermentation as reference, 74.13 % and 54.92 % of the variation were explained by the first two principal components for ‘Arinto’ and ‘Síria’, respectively. VOCs profile evolution of wines seems to be mainly influenced by the fermentation conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola
Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
12.50%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola (Journal of Viticulture and Enology) is an international journal that publishes original articles, research notes and review articles, written in Portuguese or in English, on the various fields of the science and technology of vine and wine: Viticulture, Enology and Vitivinicultural economy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信