不同葡萄品种通过不同的提取系统获得的果汁质量

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Izabel Camacho Nardello, Angélica Bender, Vinícius Caliari, André Luiz Kulkamp de Souza, Marcelo Barbosa Malgarim
{"title":"不同葡萄品种通过不同的提取系统获得的果汁质量","authors":"Izabel Camacho Nardello, Angélica Bender, Vinícius Caliari, André Luiz Kulkamp de Souza, Marcelo Barbosa Malgarim","doi":"10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present work was to evaluate the physicochemical and sensory quality of juices from different grape cultivars resulting from two extraction methods. Juices from eight grape cultivars (‘Bordô’, ‘SCS 421 Paulina’, ‘BRS Carmem’, ‘Concord’, ‘BRS Cora’, ‘Isabel’, ‘Isabel Precoce’ and ‘BRS Violeta’) were prepared using two extraction systems: an integral suquifier; an adapted heat exchanger. Physicochemical determinations, such as soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, ratio (relation between soluble solids and titratable acidity), reducing sugars, density, turbidity, color, total polyphenols, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity, were evaluated in the obtained juices. Sensory assessment of the juices was also carried out based on the attributes “pleasant aroma”, “unpleasant aroma”, “acidity”, “sweetness”, “balance”, “body”, “astringency” and “overall impression”. The soluble solids content was higher when the integral suquifier was used, while total acidity was lower when the adapted heat exchanger was used for ‘BRS Carmem’ and ‘BRS Violeta’ grape cultivars. The “overall impression” of the juices showed no difference between the treatments for most grape cultivars. According to the physicochemical and antioxidant activity evaluations, the integral suquifier had superior results than the adapted heat exchanger for ‘SCS 421 Paulina’, ‘BRS Carmem’, ‘Concord’ and ‘Isabel Precoce’ grape cultivars. Sensorially, the extraction methods used did not influenced the acceptance of the juices, except for ‘BRS Carmem’, which showed greater appreciation when extracted by the integral suquifier, and for ‘Bordô’, which was more appreciated when extracted by the adapted heat exchanger method.","PeriodicalId":54244,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of juices from different grape cultivars obtained by distinct extraction systems\",\"authors\":\"Izabel Camacho Nardello, Angélica Bender, Vinícius Caliari, André Luiz Kulkamp de Souza, Marcelo Barbosa Malgarim\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present work was to evaluate the physicochemical and sensory quality of juices from different grape cultivars resulting from two extraction methods. Juices from eight grape cultivars (‘Bordô’, ‘SCS 421 Paulina’, ‘BRS Carmem’, ‘Concord’, ‘BRS Cora’, ‘Isabel’, ‘Isabel Precoce’ and ‘BRS Violeta’) were prepared using two extraction systems: an integral suquifier; an adapted heat exchanger. Physicochemical determinations, such as soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, ratio (relation between soluble solids and titratable acidity), reducing sugars, density, turbidity, color, total polyphenols, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity, were evaluated in the obtained juices. Sensory assessment of the juices was also carried out based on the attributes “pleasant aroma”, “unpleasant aroma”, “acidity”, “sweetness”, “balance”, “body”, “astringency” and “overall impression”. The soluble solids content was higher when the integral suquifier was used, while total acidity was lower when the adapted heat exchanger was used for ‘BRS Carmem’ and ‘BRS Violeta’ grape cultivars. The “overall impression” of the juices showed no difference between the treatments for most grape cultivars. According to the physicochemical and antioxidant activity evaluations, the integral suquifier had superior results than the adapted heat exchanger for ‘SCS 421 Paulina’, ‘BRS Carmem’, ‘Concord’ and ‘Isabel Precoce’ grape cultivars. Sensorially, the extraction methods used did not influenced the acceptance of the juices, except for ‘BRS Carmem’, which showed greater appreciation when extracted by the integral suquifier, and for ‘Bordô’, which was more appreciated when extracted by the adapted heat exchanger method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20213602163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是评价两种提取方法对不同葡萄品种葡萄汁的理化和感官品质的影响。从8个葡萄品种(' Bordô ', ' SCS 421 Paulina ', ' BRS Carmem ', ' Concord ', ' BRS Cora ', ' Isabel ', ' Isabel Precoce '和' BRS Violeta ')中提取汁液,使用两种提取系统:一种整体蒸煮器;改进型热交换器。对得到的果汁进行了理化测定,如可溶性固形物、pH值、可滴定酸度、比值(可溶性固形物与可滴定酸度之间的关系)、还原糖、密度、浊度、颜色、总多酚、花青素和抗氧化活性。对果汁的感官评估也基于“令人愉快的香气”、“令人不愉快的香气”、“酸度”、“甜味”、“平衡”、“身体”、“涩味”和“总体印象”等属性进行。‘BRS Carmem’和‘BRS Violeta’品种的可溶性固形物含量在采用整体式增湿器时较高,而总酸度在采用整体式换热器时较低。对大多数葡萄品种来说,不同处理对果汁的“总体印象”没有差异。通过理化和抗氧化活性评价,对‘SCS 421保利娜’、‘BRS Carmem’、‘Concord’和‘Isabel Precoce’葡萄品种而言,整体增湿器的效果优于适配式换热器。感官上,所使用的提取方法不影响果汁的接受度,除了“BRS Carmem”和“Bordô”,当用整体式蒸煮器提取时,它们表现出更大的赞赏度,而“Bordô”在采用适应的热交换器方法提取时,它们更受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of juices from different grape cultivars obtained by distinct extraction systems
The objective of the present work was to evaluate the physicochemical and sensory quality of juices from different grape cultivars resulting from two extraction methods. Juices from eight grape cultivars (‘Bordô’, ‘SCS 421 Paulina’, ‘BRS Carmem’, ‘Concord’, ‘BRS Cora’, ‘Isabel’, ‘Isabel Precoce’ and ‘BRS Violeta’) were prepared using two extraction systems: an integral suquifier; an adapted heat exchanger. Physicochemical determinations, such as soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, ratio (relation between soluble solids and titratable acidity), reducing sugars, density, turbidity, color, total polyphenols, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity, were evaluated in the obtained juices. Sensory assessment of the juices was also carried out based on the attributes “pleasant aroma”, “unpleasant aroma”, “acidity”, “sweetness”, “balance”, “body”, “astringency” and “overall impression”. The soluble solids content was higher when the integral suquifier was used, while total acidity was lower when the adapted heat exchanger was used for ‘BRS Carmem’ and ‘BRS Violeta’ grape cultivars. The “overall impression” of the juices showed no difference between the treatments for most grape cultivars. According to the physicochemical and antioxidant activity evaluations, the integral suquifier had superior results than the adapted heat exchanger for ‘SCS 421 Paulina’, ‘BRS Carmem’, ‘Concord’ and ‘Isabel Precoce’ grape cultivars. Sensorially, the extraction methods used did not influenced the acceptance of the juices, except for ‘BRS Carmem’, which showed greater appreciation when extracted by the integral suquifier, and for ‘Bordô’, which was more appreciated when extracted by the adapted heat exchanger method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola
Ciencia E Tecnica Vitivinicola Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
自引率
12.50%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola (Journal of Viticulture and Enology) is an international journal that publishes original articles, research notes and review articles, written in Portuguese or in English, on the various fields of the science and technology of vine and wine: Viticulture, Enology and Vitivinicultural economy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信