影响预测以支持自然灾害应急管理

IF 25.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Bruno Merz, Christian Kuhlicke, Michael Kunz, Massimiliano Pittore, Andrey Babeyko, David N. Bresch, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Frauke Feser, Inga Koszalka, Heidi Kreibich, Florian Pantillon, Stefano Parolai, Joaquim G. Pinto, Heinz Jürgen Punge, Eleonora Rivalta, Kai Schr?ter, Karen Strehlow, Ralf Weisse, Andreas Wurpts
{"title":"影响预测以支持自然灾害应急管理","authors":"Bruno Merz,&nbsp;Christian Kuhlicke,&nbsp;Michael Kunz,&nbsp;Massimiliano Pittore,&nbsp;Andrey Babeyko,&nbsp;David N. Bresch,&nbsp;Daniela I. V. Domeisen,&nbsp;Frauke Feser,&nbsp;Inga Koszalka,&nbsp;Heidi Kreibich,&nbsp;Florian Pantillon,&nbsp;Stefano Parolai,&nbsp;Joaquim G. Pinto,&nbsp;Heinz Jürgen Punge,&nbsp;Eleonora Rivalta,&nbsp;Kai Schr?ter,&nbsp;Karen Strehlow,&nbsp;Ralf Weisse,&nbsp;Andreas Wurpts","doi":"10.1029/2020RG000704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forecasting and early warning systems are important investments to protect lives, properties, and livelihood. While early warning systems are frequently used to predict the magnitude, location, and timing of potentially damaging events, these systems rarely provide impact estimates, such as the expected amount and distribution of physical damage, human consequences, disruption of services, or financial loss. Complementing early warning systems with impact forecasts has a twofold advantage: It would provide decision makers with richer information to take informed decisions about emergency measures and focus the attention of different disciplines on a common target. This would allow capitalizing on synergies between different disciplines and boosting the development of multihazard early warning systems. This review discusses the state of the art in impact forecasting for a wide range of natural hazards. We outline the added value of impact-based warnings compared to hazard forecasting for the emergency phase, indicate challenges and pitfalls, and synthesize the review results across hazard types most relevant for Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1029/2020RG000704","citationCount":"83","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Merz,&nbsp;Christian Kuhlicke,&nbsp;Michael Kunz,&nbsp;Massimiliano Pittore,&nbsp;Andrey Babeyko,&nbsp;David N. Bresch,&nbsp;Daniela I. V. Domeisen,&nbsp;Frauke Feser,&nbsp;Inga Koszalka,&nbsp;Heidi Kreibich,&nbsp;Florian Pantillon,&nbsp;Stefano Parolai,&nbsp;Joaquim G. Pinto,&nbsp;Heinz Jürgen Punge,&nbsp;Eleonora Rivalta,&nbsp;Kai Schr?ter,&nbsp;Karen Strehlow,&nbsp;Ralf Weisse,&nbsp;Andreas Wurpts\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2020RG000704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Forecasting and early warning systems are important investments to protect lives, properties, and livelihood. While early warning systems are frequently used to predict the magnitude, location, and timing of potentially damaging events, these systems rarely provide impact estimates, such as the expected amount and distribution of physical damage, human consequences, disruption of services, or financial loss. Complementing early warning systems with impact forecasts has a twofold advantage: It would provide decision makers with richer information to take informed decisions about emergency measures and focus the attention of different disciplines on a common target. This would allow capitalizing on synergies between different disciplines and boosting the development of multihazard early warning systems. This review discusses the state of the art in impact forecasting for a wide range of natural hazards. We outline the added value of impact-based warnings compared to hazard forecasting for the emergency phase, indicate challenges and pitfalls, and synthesize the review results across hazard types most relevant for Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews of Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1029/2020RG000704\",\"citationCount\":\"83\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews of Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020RG000704\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020RG000704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

摘要

预测和预警系统是保护生命、财产和生计的重要投资。虽然早期预警系统经常用于预测潜在破坏性事件的规模、位置和时间,但这些系统很少提供影响估计,例如物理损害的预期数量和分布、人类后果、服务中断或经济损失。用影响预测补充预警系统具有双重优势:它将为决策者提供更丰富的信息,以便就紧急措施作出知情决定,并使不同学科的注意力集中在一个共同目标上。这将有助于利用不同学科之间的协同作用,促进多灾种早期预警系统的发展。这篇综述讨论了广泛的自然灾害影响预测的最新进展。我们概述了与紧急阶段灾害预测相比,基于影响的预警的附加价值,指出了挑战和陷阱,并综合了与欧洲最相关的灾害类型的审查结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards

Forecasting and early warning systems are important investments to protect lives, properties, and livelihood. While early warning systems are frequently used to predict the magnitude, location, and timing of potentially damaging events, these systems rarely provide impact estimates, such as the expected amount and distribution of physical damage, human consequences, disruption of services, or financial loss. Complementing early warning systems with impact forecasts has a twofold advantage: It would provide decision makers with richer information to take informed decisions about emergency measures and focus the attention of different disciplines on a common target. This would allow capitalizing on synergies between different disciplines and boosting the development of multihazard early warning systems. This review discusses the state of the art in impact forecasting for a wide range of natural hazards. We outline the added value of impact-based warnings compared to hazard forecasting for the emergency phase, indicate challenges and pitfalls, and synthesize the review results across hazard types most relevant for Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews of Geophysics
Reviews of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics Reviews (ROG) offers comprehensive overviews and syntheses of current research across various domains of the Earth and space sciences. Our goal is to present accessible and engaging reviews that cater to the diverse AGU community. While authorship is typically by invitation, we warmly encourage readers and potential authors to share their suggestions with our editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信