Nicole Kiss, Carla M. Prado, Robin M. Daly, Linda Denehy, Lara Edbrooke, Brenton J. Baguley, Steve F. Fraser, Abbas Khosravi, Gavin Abbott
{"title":"在英国生物银行队列中,低肌肉量、营养不良、肌肉减少症与成人癌症患者生存率的关系","authors":"Nicole Kiss, Carla M. Prado, Robin M. Daly, Linda Denehy, Lara Edbrooke, Brenton J. Baguley, Steve F. Fraser, Abbas Khosravi, Gavin Abbott","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Low muscle mass (MM) is a common component of cancer-related malnutrition and sarcopenia, conditions that are all independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. This study aimed to (1) compare the prevalence of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia and their association with survival in adults with cancer from the UK Biobank and (2) explore the influence of different allometric scaling (height [m<sup>2</sup>] or body mass index [BMI]) on low MM estimates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants in the UK Biobank with a cancer diagnosis within 2 years of the baseline assessment were identified. Low MM was estimated by appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) from bioelectrical impedance analysis derived fat-free mass. Malnutrition was determined using the Global Leadership in Malnutrition criteria. Sarcopenia was defined using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria (version 2). All-cause mortality was determined from linked national mortality records. Cox-proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the effect of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia on all-cause mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 4122 adults with cancer (59.8 ± 7.1 years; 49.2% male) were included. Prevalence of low MM (8.0% vs. 1.7%), malnutrition (11.2% vs. 6.2%), and sarcopenia (1.4% vs. 0.2%) was higher when MM was adjusted using ALST/BMI compared with ALST/height<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Low MM using ALST/BMI identified more cases in participants with obesity (low MM 56.3% vs. 0%; malnutrition 50% vs. 18.5%; sarcopenia 50% vs. 0%). During a median 11.2 (interquartile range: 10.2, 12.0) years of follow up, 901 (21.7%) of the 4122 participants died, and of these, 744 (82.6%) deaths were cancer-specific All conditions were associated with a higher hazard of mortality using either method of MM adjustment: low MM (ALST/height<sup>2</sup>: HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3, 2.8], <i>P</i> = 0.001; ALST/BMI: HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], <i>P</i> = 0.005; malnutrition (ALST/height<sup>2</sup>: HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], <i>P</i> = 0.005; ALST/BMI: HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], <i>P</i> = 0.005; sarcopenia (ALST/height<sup>2</sup>: HR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 6.5], <i>P</i> = 0.013; ALST/BMI: HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.0, 2.4], <i>P</i> = 0.037).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In adults with cancer, malnutrition was more common than low MM or sarcopenia, although all conditions were associated with a higher mortality risk, regardless of the method of adjusting for MM. In contrast, adjustment of low MM for BMI identified more cases of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia overall and in participants with obesity compared with height adjustment, suggesting it is the preferred adjustment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"14 4","pages":"1775-1788"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13256","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low muscle mass, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and associations with survival in adults with cancer in the UK Biobank cohort\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Kiss, Carla M. Prado, Robin M. Daly, Linda Denehy, Lara Edbrooke, Brenton J. Baguley, Steve F. Fraser, Abbas Khosravi, Gavin Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcsm.13256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Low muscle mass (MM) is a common component of cancer-related malnutrition and sarcopenia, conditions that are all independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. This study aimed to (1) compare the prevalence of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia and their association with survival in adults with cancer from the UK Biobank and (2) explore the influence of different allometric scaling (height [m<sup>2</sup>] or body mass index [BMI]) on low MM estimates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants in the UK Biobank with a cancer diagnosis within 2 years of the baseline assessment were identified. Low MM was estimated by appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) from bioelectrical impedance analysis derived fat-free mass. Malnutrition was determined using the Global Leadership in Malnutrition criteria. Sarcopenia was defined using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria (version 2). All-cause mortality was determined from linked national mortality records. Cox-proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the effect of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia on all-cause mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 4122 adults with cancer (59.8 ± 7.1 years; 49.2% male) were included. Prevalence of low MM (8.0% vs. 1.7%), malnutrition (11.2% vs. 6.2%), and sarcopenia (1.4% vs. 0.2%) was higher when MM was adjusted using ALST/BMI compared with ALST/height<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Low MM using ALST/BMI identified more cases in participants with obesity (low MM 56.3% vs. 0%; malnutrition 50% vs. 18.5%; sarcopenia 50% vs. 0%). During a median 11.2 (interquartile range: 10.2, 12.0) years of follow up, 901 (21.7%) of the 4122 participants died, and of these, 744 (82.6%) deaths were cancer-specific All conditions were associated with a higher hazard of mortality using either method of MM adjustment: low MM (ALST/height<sup>2</sup>: HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3, 2.8], <i>P</i> = 0.001; ALST/BMI: HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], <i>P</i> = 0.005; malnutrition (ALST/height<sup>2</sup>: HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], <i>P</i> = 0.005; ALST/BMI: HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], <i>P</i> = 0.005; sarcopenia (ALST/height<sup>2</sup>: HR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 6.5], <i>P</i> = 0.013; ALST/BMI: HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.0, 2.4], <i>P</i> = 0.037).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In adults with cancer, malnutrition was more common than low MM or sarcopenia, although all conditions were associated with a higher mortality risk, regardless of the method of adjusting for MM. In contrast, adjustment of low MM for BMI identified more cases of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia overall and in participants with obesity compared with height adjustment, suggesting it is the preferred adjustment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"1775-1788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13256\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13256\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:低肌肉质量(MM)是癌症相关营养不良和肌肉减少症的常见组成部分,这些疾病都与死亡风险增加独立相关。本研究旨在(1)比较来自英国生物银行(UK Biobank)的成人癌症患者中低MM、营养不良和肌肉减少症的患病率及其与生存率的关系;(2)探索不同异速测量尺度(身高[m2]或体重指数[BMI])对低MM估计的影响。方法在基线评估后2年内被诊断为癌症的英国生物银行参与者被确定。通过生物电阻抗分析得出无脂质量,通过阑尾瘦软组织(ALST)估计低MM。营养不良是根据全球营养不良领导标准确定的。肌少症的定义采用欧洲老年人肌少症工作组标准(版本2)。全因死亡率根据相关的国家死亡率记录确定。拟合cox比例风险模型来估计低MM、营养不良和肌肉减少症对全因死亡率的影响。结果共4122例成人肿瘤患者(59.8±7.1岁;49.2%为男性)。当分别使用ALST/BMI与ALST/身高2调整MM时,低MM(8.0%对1.7%)、营养不良(11.2%对6.2%)和肌肉减少症(1.4%对0.2%)的患病率更高。低MM使用ALST/BMI识别出更多的肥胖病例(低MM 56.3%对0%;营养不良50% vs. 18.5%;肌肉减少50% vs. 0%)。在中位随访11.2年(四分位数间距:10.2,12.0)期间,4122名参与者中有901人(21.7%)死亡,其中744人(82.6%)死亡是癌症特异性死亡。使用MM调整的任何一种方法,所有疾病都与较高的死亡风险相关:低MM (ALST/height2: HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3, 2.8], P = 0.001;Alst / bmi: hr 1.3 [95% ci 1.1, 1.7], p = 0.005;营养不良(ALST/ high2: HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], P = 0.005;Alst / bmi: hr 1.3 [95% ci 1.1, 1.7], p = 0.005;肌肉减少症(ALST/height2: HR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 6.5], P = 0.013;Alst / bmi: hr 1.6 [95% ci 1.0, 2.4], p = 0.037]。结论:在成年癌症患者中,营养不良比低MM或肌肉减少症更常见,尽管所有情况都与更高的死亡风险相关,无论MM调整方法如何。相反,与身高调整相比,BMI调整低MM发现了更多的低MM、营养不良和肌肉减少症的病例,并且在肥胖的参与者中,这表明它是首选的调整。
Low muscle mass, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and associations with survival in adults with cancer in the UK Biobank cohort
Background
Low muscle mass (MM) is a common component of cancer-related malnutrition and sarcopenia, conditions that are all independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. This study aimed to (1) compare the prevalence of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia and their association with survival in adults with cancer from the UK Biobank and (2) explore the influence of different allometric scaling (height [m2] or body mass index [BMI]) on low MM estimates.
Methods
Participants in the UK Biobank with a cancer diagnosis within 2 years of the baseline assessment were identified. Low MM was estimated by appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) from bioelectrical impedance analysis derived fat-free mass. Malnutrition was determined using the Global Leadership in Malnutrition criteria. Sarcopenia was defined using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria (version 2). All-cause mortality was determined from linked national mortality records. Cox-proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the effect of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia on all-cause mortality.
Results
In total, 4122 adults with cancer (59.8 ± 7.1 years; 49.2% male) were included. Prevalence of low MM (8.0% vs. 1.7%), malnutrition (11.2% vs. 6.2%), and sarcopenia (1.4% vs. 0.2%) was higher when MM was adjusted using ALST/BMI compared with ALST/height2, respectively. Low MM using ALST/BMI identified more cases in participants with obesity (low MM 56.3% vs. 0%; malnutrition 50% vs. 18.5%; sarcopenia 50% vs. 0%). During a median 11.2 (interquartile range: 10.2, 12.0) years of follow up, 901 (21.7%) of the 4122 participants died, and of these, 744 (82.6%) deaths were cancer-specific All conditions were associated with a higher hazard of mortality using either method of MM adjustment: low MM (ALST/height2: HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3, 2.8], P = 0.001; ALST/BMI: HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], P = 0.005; malnutrition (ALST/height2: HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], P = 0.005; ALST/BMI: HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1, 1.7], P = 0.005; sarcopenia (ALST/height2: HR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 6.5], P = 0.013; ALST/BMI: HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.0, 2.4], P = 0.037).
Conclusions
In adults with cancer, malnutrition was more common than low MM or sarcopenia, although all conditions were associated with a higher mortality risk, regardless of the method of adjusting for MM. In contrast, adjustment of low MM for BMI identified more cases of low MM, malnutrition, and sarcopenia overall and in participants with obesity compared with height adjustment, suggesting it is the preferred adjustment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle is a prestigious, peer-reviewed international publication committed to disseminating research and clinical insights pertaining to cachexia, sarcopenia, body composition, and the physiological and pathophysiological alterations occurring throughout the lifespan and in various illnesses across the spectrum of life sciences. This journal serves as a valuable resource for physicians, biochemists, biologists, dieticians, pharmacologists, and students alike.