使用家庭成员或亲密的朋友作为有和没有失语症的老年人参与目标的信息

K. Haley, Thomas Wangerman
{"title":"使用家庭成员或亲密的朋友作为有和没有失语症的老年人参与目标的信息","authors":"K. Haley, Thomas Wangerman","doi":"10.1044/NNSLD22.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Client-centered care is a stated focus for many rehabilitation programs, but personalized goal-setting presents unique challenges for people with aphasia (PWA). A potential solution for clinicians is to enlist the help of family members or close friends to determine what life activities should be addressed. In this article, we review two main reasons this solution is not ideal. First, we discuss how negative effects on autonomy and motivation may be instigated unintentionally. Next, we consider to what extent accurate input can be assumed by proxy responders. We conclude by reporting the results of a small study showing that congruence about activity choices among family members or friends not affected by aphasia is similar to previously reported congruence in families with a history of aphasia. These results suggest that ability to predict life activity preferences in others is limited, regardless of the presence of aphasia. We contend that although the input and participation of significant others is of...","PeriodicalId":88628,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on neurophysiology and neurogenic speech and language disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Family Members or Close Friends as Informants About Participation Goals for Older Adults With and Without Aphasia\",\"authors\":\"K. Haley, Thomas Wangerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/NNSLD22.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Client-centered care is a stated focus for many rehabilitation programs, but personalized goal-setting presents unique challenges for people with aphasia (PWA). A potential solution for clinicians is to enlist the help of family members or close friends to determine what life activities should be addressed. In this article, we review two main reasons this solution is not ideal. First, we discuss how negative effects on autonomy and motivation may be instigated unintentionally. Next, we consider to what extent accurate input can be assumed by proxy responders. We conclude by reporting the results of a small study showing that congruence about activity choices among family members or friends not affected by aphasia is similar to previously reported congruence in families with a history of aphasia. These results suggest that ability to predict life activity preferences in others is limited, regardless of the presence of aphasia. We contend that although the input and participation of significant others is of...\",\"PeriodicalId\":88628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on neurophysiology and neurogenic speech and language disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"12-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on neurophysiology and neurogenic speech and language disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/NNSLD22.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on neurophysiology and neurogenic speech and language disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/NNSLD22.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

以客户为中心的护理是许多康复计划的重点,但个性化的目标设定对失语症患者提出了独特的挑战。对于临床医生来说,一个潜在的解决方案是寻求家庭成员或亲密朋友的帮助,以确定应该解决哪些生活活动。在本文中,我们将回顾该解决方案不理想的两个主要原因。首先,我们讨论了对自主性和动机的负面影响是如何在无意中产生的。接下来,我们考虑代理应答者可以在多大程度上假设准确的输入。我们通过报告一项小型研究的结果得出结论,该研究表明,未受失语症影响的家庭成员或朋友对活动选择的一致性与先前报道的有失语症病史的家庭的一致性相似。这些结果表明,无论失语症是否存在,预测他人生活活动偏好的能力都是有限的。我们认为,尽管重要他人的投入和参与是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Family Members or Close Friends as Informants About Participation Goals for Older Adults With and Without Aphasia
Client-centered care is a stated focus for many rehabilitation programs, but personalized goal-setting presents unique challenges for people with aphasia (PWA). A potential solution for clinicians is to enlist the help of family members or close friends to determine what life activities should be addressed. In this article, we review two main reasons this solution is not ideal. First, we discuss how negative effects on autonomy and motivation may be instigated unintentionally. Next, we consider to what extent accurate input can be assumed by proxy responders. We conclude by reporting the results of a small study showing that congruence about activity choices among family members or friends not affected by aphasia is similar to previously reported congruence in families with a history of aphasia. These results suggest that ability to predict life activity preferences in others is limited, regardless of the presence of aphasia. We contend that although the input and participation of significant others is of...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信