M.A. López-Montenegro Soria , M. Climente Martí , N.V. Jiménez Torres
{"title":"医生接受建议为患者提供改善药物治疗的机会","authors":"M.A. López-Montenegro Soria , M. Climente Martí , N.V. Jiménez Torres","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and quantify the influence of different variables on the implementation of pharmacotherapy optimisation measures in hospitalised patients.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2000–2007. Environment: public university general hospital (25,000 patients admitted/year).</p><p>The Programme implemented to improve pharmacotherapy quality and patient safety covers 30% of all patients. Using records from the Atefarm<sup>®</sup> Farmis application, we analysed pharmacotherapy recommendations (PRs) made by pharmacists to doctors. The selected variables were the following: Risk of the medication for ADE (1-high, 0-low), ADE category, (0-indication, 1-effectiveness, 2-safety), potential severity (scale of 1 to 5), impact of the PR (0-effectiveness, 1-safety, 2-efficiency) and implementation of the PR (yes/no).</p><p>We calculated the frequency (%) and 95% CI for the categorical variables and performed a multivariate logistical regression analysis to identify the variables’ degree of influence on implementing the PRs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 7920 ADEs in 4680 patients. A PR was issued in 85% of the cases (6762), and it was implemented in 83% (95% CI 74.2–89.8). Potential severity of the ADE ≥2 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.27–1.94), and ADE category for effectiveness and safety (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.39) were shown to be determining factors for implementing the PR for the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The probability that a PR will be implemented for a patient is related to the potential severity and the category of the identified ADE. Therefore, recommendations intended to improve effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or patient safety, and those with potential clinical consequences have a greater chance of being applied to a patient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 51-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doctors’ acceptance of recommendations for patients with the opportunity for pharmacotherapy improvement\",\"authors\":\"M.A. López-Montenegro Soria , M. Climente Martí , N.V. Jiménez Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and quantify the influence of different variables on the implementation of pharmacotherapy optimisation measures in hospitalised patients.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2000–2007. Environment: public university general hospital (25,000 patients admitted/year).</p><p>The Programme implemented to improve pharmacotherapy quality and patient safety covers 30% of all patients. Using records from the Atefarm<sup>®</sup> Farmis application, we analysed pharmacotherapy recommendations (PRs) made by pharmacists to doctors. The selected variables were the following: Risk of the medication for ADE (1-high, 0-low), ADE category, (0-indication, 1-effectiveness, 2-safety), potential severity (scale of 1 to 5), impact of the PR (0-effectiveness, 1-safety, 2-efficiency) and implementation of the PR (yes/no).</p><p>We calculated the frequency (%) and 95% CI for the categorical variables and performed a multivariate logistical regression analysis to identify the variables’ degree of influence on implementing the PRs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 7920 ADEs in 4680 patients. A PR was issued in 85% of the cases (6762), and it was implemented in 83% (95% CI 74.2–89.8). Potential severity of the ADE ≥2 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.27–1.94), and ADE category for effectiveness and safety (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.39) were shown to be determining factors for implementing the PR for the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The probability that a PR will be implemented for a patient is related to the potential severity and the category of the identified ADE. Therefore, recommendations intended to improve effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or patient safety, and those with potential clinical consequences have a greater chance of being applied to a patient.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70008-9\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511700089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511700089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的确定并量化不同变量对住院患者实施药物治疗优化措施的影响。方法描述性横向研究。期:2000 - 2007。环境:公立大学总医院(每年收治25000名患者)。为提高药物治疗质量和患者安全而实施的方案覆盖了所有患者的30%。使用Atefarm®Farmis应用程序的记录,我们分析了药剂师向医生提出的药物治疗建议(pr)。选择的变量如下:ADE的用药风险(1-高,0-低),ADE类别(0指征,1-有效性,2-安全性),潜在严重程度(1- 5级),PR的影响(0-有效性,1-安全性,2-有效性)和PR的实施(是/否)。我们计算了分类变量的频率(%)和95% CI,并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定变量对实施pr的影响程度。结果4680例患者中发现7920例ade。85%的病例(6762例)发放了PR, 83%的患者实施了PR (95% CI 74.2-89.8)。ADE的潜在严重程度≥2 (OR 1.57;95% CI 1.27-1.94), ADE分类的有效性和安全性(OR 1.19;95% CI 1.02-1.39)是患者实施PR的决定因素。结论患者实施PR的可能性与潜在的严重程度和已确定的ADE的类别有关。因此,旨在提高药物治疗有效性或患者安全性的建议以及具有潜在临床后果的建议更有可能应用于患者。
Doctors’ acceptance of recommendations for patients with the opportunity for pharmacotherapy improvement
Objective
To identify and quantify the influence of different variables on the implementation of pharmacotherapy optimisation measures in hospitalised patients.
Method
Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2000–2007. Environment: public university general hospital (25,000 patients admitted/year).
The Programme implemented to improve pharmacotherapy quality and patient safety covers 30% of all patients. Using records from the Atefarm® Farmis application, we analysed pharmacotherapy recommendations (PRs) made by pharmacists to doctors. The selected variables were the following: Risk of the medication for ADE (1-high, 0-low), ADE category, (0-indication, 1-effectiveness, 2-safety), potential severity (scale of 1 to 5), impact of the PR (0-effectiveness, 1-safety, 2-efficiency) and implementation of the PR (yes/no).
We calculated the frequency (%) and 95% CI for the categorical variables and performed a multivariate logistical regression analysis to identify the variables’ degree of influence on implementing the PRs.
Results
We identified 7920 ADEs in 4680 patients. A PR was issued in 85% of the cases (6762), and it was implemented in 83% (95% CI 74.2–89.8). Potential severity of the ADE ≥2 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.27–1.94), and ADE category for effectiveness and safety (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02–1.39) were shown to be determining factors for implementing the PR for the patient.
Conclusions
The probability that a PR will be implemented for a patient is related to the potential severity and the category of the identified ADE. Therefore, recommendations intended to improve effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or patient safety, and those with potential clinical consequences have a greater chance of being applied to a patient.