对有肾脏风险的药物患者的药物干预方案的评估

L. Álvarez Arroyo , E. Climent Grana , N. Bosacoma Ros , S. Roca Meroño , M. Perdiguero Gil , J.P. Ordovás Baines , J. Sánchez Payá
{"title":"对有肾脏风险的药物患者的药物干预方案的评估","authors":"L. Álvarez Arroyo ,&nbsp;E. Climent Grana ,&nbsp;N. Bosacoma Ros ,&nbsp;S. Roca Meroño ,&nbsp;M. Perdiguero Gil ,&nbsp;J.P. Ordovás Baines ,&nbsp;J. Sánchez Payá","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70080-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the adaptation of medical prescriptions according to the dosage guides in patients with renal disease, before and after applying a pharmaceutical intervention programme. The secondary objectives were to prepare a guide to dosing in renal disease and to measure the prevalence of prescription of drugs with renal risk.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Non-randomised, experimental interventional study (before/after) conducted in a general hospital with 800 beds, including hospitalised patients, over the age of 18, with kidney disease and drugs with renal risk prescribed in their pharmaco-therapeutic profile. The study was designed to be carried out in 2 descriptive cross-cutting phases (control group) and a prospective interventional cohort study (intervention group). The primary variable was the percentage non-adaptation according to the stage of renal disease.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 185 patients, 88 in the control group and 97 in the intervention group. In the intervention group, the prevalence of non-compliance before and after the intervention was 18.7% and 2.1%, representing a statistically significant reduction in nonadaptation of the dose. The costs saved with the pharmaceutical intervention programme were 1939.63 euro over 2 months, the average saving per medication intervened amounting to 62.57 euro (95% CI, 23.99–101.14 euro; <em>P</em>=.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the study indicate that the application of a pharmaceutical care model based on the prospective validation of drugs with renal risk, very significantly improved the adaptation of dosing regimens in kidney disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 147-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70080-2","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of a pharmaceutical interventional programme in patients on medications with renal risk\",\"authors\":\"L. Álvarez Arroyo ,&nbsp;E. Climent Grana ,&nbsp;N. Bosacoma Ros ,&nbsp;S. Roca Meroño ,&nbsp;M. Perdiguero Gil ,&nbsp;J.P. Ordovás Baines ,&nbsp;J. Sánchez Payá\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70080-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the adaptation of medical prescriptions according to the dosage guides in patients with renal disease, before and after applying a pharmaceutical intervention programme. The secondary objectives were to prepare a guide to dosing in renal disease and to measure the prevalence of prescription of drugs with renal risk.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Non-randomised, experimental interventional study (before/after) conducted in a general hospital with 800 beds, including hospitalised patients, over the age of 18, with kidney disease and drugs with renal risk prescribed in their pharmaco-therapeutic profile. The study was designed to be carried out in 2 descriptive cross-cutting phases (control group) and a prospective interventional cohort study (intervention group). The primary variable was the percentage non-adaptation according to the stage of renal disease.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 185 patients, 88 in the control group and 97 in the intervention group. In the intervention group, the prevalence of non-compliance before and after the intervention was 18.7% and 2.1%, representing a statistically significant reduction in nonadaptation of the dose. The costs saved with the pharmaceutical intervention programme were 1939.63 euro over 2 months, the average saving per medication intervened amounting to 62.57 euro (95% CI, 23.99–101.14 euro; <em>P</em>=.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the study indicate that the application of a pharmaceutical care model based on the prospective validation of drugs with renal risk, very significantly improved the adaptation of dosing regimens in kidney disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 147-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70080-2\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的比较肾脏疾病患者在实施药物干预方案前后按剂量指南用药处方的适应性。次要目标是编写肾脏疾病的剂量指南,并衡量有肾脏风险的处方药的流行程度。方法在某综合医院800张床位进行非随机、实验性介入研究(术前/术后),研究对象包括18岁以上、患有肾脏疾病且药物治疗资料中规定有肾脏风险的住院患者。本研究分为两个描述性交叉阶段(对照组)和一个前瞻性干预性队列研究(干预组)。主要变量是根据肾脏疾病分期的不适应百分比。结果共纳入185例患者,对照组88例,干预组97例。在干预组中,干预前后的不顺应率分别为18.7%和2.1%,对剂量的不适应率有统计学意义上的显著降低。药物干预方案在2个月内节省的费用为1939.63欧元,每次药物干预平均节省62.57欧元(95% CI, 23.99-101.14欧元;P = .02点)。结论基于前瞻性肾风险药物验证的药学服务模式的应用,非常显著地提高了肾脏疾病给药方案的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of a pharmaceutical interventional programme in patients on medications with renal risk

Objective

To compare the adaptation of medical prescriptions according to the dosage guides in patients with renal disease, before and after applying a pharmaceutical intervention programme. The secondary objectives were to prepare a guide to dosing in renal disease and to measure the prevalence of prescription of drugs with renal risk.

Method

Non-randomised, experimental interventional study (before/after) conducted in a general hospital with 800 beds, including hospitalised patients, over the age of 18, with kidney disease and drugs with renal risk prescribed in their pharmaco-therapeutic profile. The study was designed to be carried out in 2 descriptive cross-cutting phases (control group) and a prospective interventional cohort study (intervention group). The primary variable was the percentage non-adaptation according to the stage of renal disease.

Results

The study included 185 patients, 88 in the control group and 97 in the intervention group. In the intervention group, the prevalence of non-compliance before and after the intervention was 18.7% and 2.1%, representing a statistically significant reduction in nonadaptation of the dose. The costs saved with the pharmaceutical intervention programme were 1939.63 euro over 2 months, the average saving per medication intervened amounting to 62.57 euro (95% CI, 23.99–101.14 euro; P=.02).

Conclusions

The results of the study indicate that the application of a pharmaceutical care model based on the prospective validation of drugs with renal risk, very significantly improved the adaptation of dosing regimens in kidney disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信