指定司机的同伴是否饮酒过量?

Wayne M Harding , Barry D Caudill , Brent A Moore
{"title":"指定司机的同伴是否饮酒过量?","authors":"Wayne M Harding ,&nbsp;Barry D Caudill ,&nbsp;Brent A Moore","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00097-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> A common criticism of designated driver programs (DDPs) is that they promote excessive drinking among companions of the designated driver (DD). <strong>Methods:</strong> Data were collected from two representative samples of drinkers using computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs), and questionnaires administered to customers in barrooms. <strong>Results:</strong> Most respondents drank moderately—had usual estimated blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of less than 0.10 when they used DDs. Differences between respondents' estimated BACs when they used a DD and when they drank outside their homes were very small: 0.017 in both samples. Additional analyses examined shifts between lower and higher categories of risk defined as a BAC of less than 0.10 and a BAC of 0.10 or greater. A minority, 15% of CATI and 30% of barroom respondents, switched to the higher risk category when using a DD. These CATI and barroom respondents increased their BACs by an average of 0.089 and 0.11, respectively. Risk associated with this increase was mitigated, however, by respondents' infrequent use of DDs. <strong>Implications:</strong> Use of DDs was not generally associated with excessive alcohol consumption. Since a minority of respondents did drink heavily when using a DD, programs promoting DD use should caution drinkers that the availability of a DD is not an excuse for excessive consumption, and remind hosts and servers that they should not overserve their guests or customers even when they have a DD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00097-9","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do companions of designated drivers drink excessively?\",\"authors\":\"Wayne M Harding ,&nbsp;Barry D Caudill ,&nbsp;Brent A Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00097-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> A common criticism of designated driver programs (DDPs) is that they promote excessive drinking among companions of the designated driver (DD). <strong>Methods:</strong> Data were collected from two representative samples of drinkers using computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs), and questionnaires administered to customers in barrooms. <strong>Results:</strong> Most respondents drank moderately—had usual estimated blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of less than 0.10 when they used DDs. Differences between respondents' estimated BACs when they used a DD and when they drank outside their homes were very small: 0.017 in both samples. Additional analyses examined shifts between lower and higher categories of risk defined as a BAC of less than 0.10 and a BAC of 0.10 or greater. A minority, 15% of CATI and 30% of barroom respondents, switched to the higher risk category when using a DD. These CATI and barroom respondents increased their BACs by an average of 0.089 and 0.11, respectively. Risk associated with this increase was mitigated, however, by respondents' infrequent use of DDs. <strong>Implications:</strong> Use of DDs was not generally associated with excessive alcohol consumption. Since a minority of respondents did drink heavily when using a DD, programs promoting DD use should caution drinkers that the availability of a DD is not an excuse for excessive consumption, and remind hosts and servers that they should not overserve their guests or customers even when they have a DD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00097-9\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328901000979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328901000979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

目的:对指定司机计划(ddp)的一个普遍批评是,它们促进了指定司机(DD)的同伴过度饮酒。方法:采用计算机辅助电话访谈法(CATIs)对两个有代表性的饮酒者样本进行数据收集,并对酒吧间的顾客进行问卷调查。结果:大多数应答者饮酒适度——当他们使用ddds时,通常估计血液酒精浓度(BACs)低于0.10。受访者在使用DD和在室外饮酒时估计的bac之间的差异非常小:两个样本的差异都是0.017。其他分析检查了低风险类别和高风险类别之间的变化,定义为BAC低于0.10和BAC大于或等于0.10。少数人,15%的CATI和30%的酒吧受访者,在使用DD时转向高风险类别。这些CATI和酒吧受访者的bac分别平均增加0.089和0.11。然而,由于受访者不经常使用dd,与此相关的风险降低了。含义:使用ddds通常与过度饮酒无关。由于少数受访者在使用DD时确实会大量饮酒,因此推广DD使用的程序应该提醒饮酒者,有DD并不是过度消费的借口,并提醒主人和服务器,即使他们有DD,也不应该为客人或顾客提供过多的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do companions of designated drivers drink excessively?

Purpose: A common criticism of designated driver programs (DDPs) is that they promote excessive drinking among companions of the designated driver (DD). Methods: Data were collected from two representative samples of drinkers using computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs), and questionnaires administered to customers in barrooms. Results: Most respondents drank moderately—had usual estimated blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of less than 0.10 when they used DDs. Differences between respondents' estimated BACs when they used a DD and when they drank outside their homes were very small: 0.017 in both samples. Additional analyses examined shifts between lower and higher categories of risk defined as a BAC of less than 0.10 and a BAC of 0.10 or greater. A minority, 15% of CATI and 30% of barroom respondents, switched to the higher risk category when using a DD. These CATI and barroom respondents increased their BACs by an average of 0.089 and 0.11, respectively. Risk associated with this increase was mitigated, however, by respondents' infrequent use of DDs. Implications: Use of DDs was not generally associated with excessive alcohol consumption. Since a minority of respondents did drink heavily when using a DD, programs promoting DD use should caution drinkers that the availability of a DD is not an excuse for excessive consumption, and remind hosts and servers that they should not overserve their guests or customers even when they have a DD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信