Amy Nicole Grudzinski , Zafar Hakim , Stephen Joel Coons , David M Labiner
{"title":"QOLIE-31在常规临床实践中的应用","authors":"Amy Nicole Grudzinski , Zafar Hakim , Stephen Joel Coons , David M Labiner","doi":"10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The most important outcome of medical care may be the patient’s perception of his or her functioning and well-being, or quality of life. However, patient-reported quality of life is not often routinely and/or adequately assessed. This study examined the usefulness of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in predicting patient-reported health status when compared with information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction. A survey instrument was administered to 40 patients immediately prior to a scheduled epilepsy clinic visit. The instrument included the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and 21 additional items that assessed, among other things, information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction regarding adverse drug effects and seizure frequency. Regression analysis revealed that information regarding seizure frequency and adverse drug effects provided little insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Only 11.25% of the variance in patients’ self-reported health status was explained by variations in these traditional measures. The addition of QOLIE-derived data to traditional information significantly improved the ability to predict patients’ self-reported health status. The results of this study indicate that the administration of an HRQoL instrument in routine clinical practice offers additional insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Furthermore, the study indicated that this additional information can be collected in a reasonable amount of time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 34-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the QOLIE-31 in Routine Clinical Practice\",\"authors\":\"Amy Nicole Grudzinski , Zafar Hakim , Stephen Joel Coons , David M Labiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The most important outcome of medical care may be the patient’s perception of his or her functioning and well-being, or quality of life. However, patient-reported quality of life is not often routinely and/or adequately assessed. This study examined the usefulness of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in predicting patient-reported health status when compared with information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction. A survey instrument was administered to 40 patients immediately prior to a scheduled epilepsy clinic visit. The instrument included the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and 21 additional items that assessed, among other things, information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction regarding adverse drug effects and seizure frequency. Regression analysis revealed that information regarding seizure frequency and adverse drug effects provided little insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Only 11.25% of the variance in patients’ self-reported health status was explained by variations in these traditional measures. The addition of QOLIE-derived data to traditional information significantly improved the ability to predict patients’ self-reported health status. The results of this study indicate that the administration of an HRQoL instrument in routine clinical practice offers additional insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Furthermore, the study indicated that this additional information can be collected in a reasonable amount of time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 34-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896697497001102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896697497001102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The most important outcome of medical care may be the patient’s perception of his or her functioning and well-being, or quality of life. However, patient-reported quality of life is not often routinely and/or adequately assessed. This study examined the usefulness of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in predicting patient-reported health status when compared with information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction. A survey instrument was administered to 40 patients immediately prior to a scheduled epilepsy clinic visit. The instrument included the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and 21 additional items that assessed, among other things, information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction regarding adverse drug effects and seizure frequency. Regression analysis revealed that information regarding seizure frequency and adverse drug effects provided little insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Only 11.25% of the variance in patients’ self-reported health status was explained by variations in these traditional measures. The addition of QOLIE-derived data to traditional information significantly improved the ability to predict patients’ self-reported health status. The results of this study indicate that the administration of an HRQoL instrument in routine clinical practice offers additional insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Furthermore, the study indicated that this additional information can be collected in a reasonable amount of time.