QOLIE-31在常规临床实践中的应用

Amy Nicole Grudzinski , Zafar Hakim , Stephen Joel Coons , David M Labiner
{"title":"QOLIE-31在常规临床实践中的应用","authors":"Amy Nicole Grudzinski ,&nbsp;Zafar Hakim ,&nbsp;Stephen Joel Coons ,&nbsp;David M Labiner","doi":"10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The most important outcome of medical care may be the patient’s perception of his or her functioning and well-being, or quality of life. However, patient-reported quality of life is not often routinely and/or adequately assessed. This study examined the usefulness of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in predicting patient-reported health status when compared with information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction. A survey instrument was administered to 40 patients immediately prior to a scheduled epilepsy clinic visit. The instrument included the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and 21 additional items that assessed, among other things, information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction regarding adverse drug effects and seizure frequency. Regression analysis revealed that information regarding seizure frequency and adverse drug effects provided little insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Only 11.25% of the variance in patients’ self-reported health status was explained by variations in these traditional measures. The addition of QOLIE-derived data to traditional information significantly improved the ability to predict patients’ self-reported health status. The results of this study indicate that the administration of an HRQoL instrument in routine clinical practice offers additional insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Furthermore, the study indicated that this additional information can be collected in a reasonable amount of time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 34-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the QOLIE-31 in Routine Clinical Practice\",\"authors\":\"Amy Nicole Grudzinski ,&nbsp;Zafar Hakim ,&nbsp;Stephen Joel Coons ,&nbsp;David M Labiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The most important outcome of medical care may be the patient’s perception of his or her functioning and well-being, or quality of life. However, patient-reported quality of life is not often routinely and/or adequately assessed. This study examined the usefulness of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in predicting patient-reported health status when compared with information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction. A survey instrument was administered to 40 patients immediately prior to a scheduled epilepsy clinic visit. The instrument included the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and 21 additional items that assessed, among other things, information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction regarding adverse drug effects and seizure frequency. Regression analysis revealed that information regarding seizure frequency and adverse drug effects provided little insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Only 11.25% of the variance in patients’ self-reported health status was explained by variations in these traditional measures. The addition of QOLIE-derived data to traditional information significantly improved the ability to predict patients’ self-reported health status. The results of this study indicate that the administration of an HRQoL instrument in routine clinical practice offers additional insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Furthermore, the study indicated that this additional information can be collected in a reasonable amount of time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 34-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0896-6974(97)00110-2\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896697497001102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896697497001102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

医疗护理最重要的结果可能是病人对他或她的功能和健康,或生活质量的感知。然而,患者报告的生活质量通常没有常规和/或充分的评估。本研究考察了健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)信息在预测患者报告的健康状况方面的有用性,并将其与医患互动中常规获得的信息进行了比较。在预定的癫痫门诊访问之前,对40名患者立即使用了一种调查工具。该工具包括31项癫痫生活质量清单(QOLIE-31)和21项附加项目,除其他外,评估在医患互动中常规获得的有关药物不良反应和癫痫发作频率的信息。回归分析显示,关于癫痫发作频率和药物不良反应的信息对患者自我感知的健康状况几乎没有帮助。在患者自我报告的健康状况中,只有11.25%的差异可以用这些传统测量方法的差异来解释。将qolie衍生的数据添加到传统信息中,显著提高了预测患者自我报告健康状况的能力。本研究结果表明,在常规临床实践中使用HRQoL仪器可以进一步了解患者自我感知的健康状况。此外,研究表明,这些额外的信息可以在合理的时间内收集到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of the QOLIE-31 in Routine Clinical Practice

The most important outcome of medical care may be the patient’s perception of his or her functioning and well-being, or quality of life. However, patient-reported quality of life is not often routinely and/or adequately assessed. This study examined the usefulness of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in predicting patient-reported health status when compared with information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction. A survey instrument was administered to 40 patients immediately prior to a scheduled epilepsy clinic visit. The instrument included the 31-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and 21 additional items that assessed, among other things, information routinely obtained in a physician–patient interaction regarding adverse drug effects and seizure frequency. Regression analysis revealed that information regarding seizure frequency and adverse drug effects provided little insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Only 11.25% of the variance in patients’ self-reported health status was explained by variations in these traditional measures. The addition of QOLIE-derived data to traditional information significantly improved the ability to predict patients’ self-reported health status. The results of this study indicate that the administration of an HRQoL instrument in routine clinical practice offers additional insight into patients’ self-perceived health status. Furthermore, the study indicated that this additional information can be collected in a reasonable amount of time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信