新医学院的影响和增加招生的问题

John O. Lostetter, John E. Chapman
{"title":"新医学院的影响和增加招生的问题","authors":"John O. Lostetter,&nbsp;John E. Chapman","doi":"10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80009-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Is there an impending physician surplus? The authors' position is that there is an impending surplus. Health planners must be cognizant of this eventuality. The federal government as one of the major authors of health policy guidelines is currently reacting to the surplus question. But federal reaction can at times be too swift, too dramatic, and not in the best interests of those who must maintain previous investments. Therefore, both the supporters of health-related educational institutions and those who are responsible for program implementation must attempt to define and reach a common understanding of the situation. Policy development and planning activities must be collaborative efforts that emphasize <em>involvement</em>.</p><p>In this paper, the authors present a brief review of federal policies relative to the production of physicians and other health professionals. It is hoped that one can better understand the current situation and more effectively plan the future if past developments are included. This should lead to a comprehensive analysis from a common perspective. The involvement of the Carnegie Commission (Carnegie Council) is also included for the same reasons.</p><p>All analyses lead to the current situation and the authors' position that there is an impending physician surplus. The central problem has shifted from physician supply to the problem of physician maldistribution, both geographically and by specialty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 317-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80009-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of new medical schools and the issues of increasing enrollment\",\"authors\":\"John O. Lostetter,&nbsp;John E. Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80009-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Is there an impending physician surplus? The authors' position is that there is an impending surplus. Health planners must be cognizant of this eventuality. The federal government as one of the major authors of health policy guidelines is currently reacting to the surplus question. But federal reaction can at times be too swift, too dramatic, and not in the best interests of those who must maintain previous investments. Therefore, both the supporters of health-related educational institutions and those who are responsible for program implementation must attempt to define and reach a common understanding of the situation. Policy development and planning activities must be collaborative efforts that emphasize <em>involvement</em>.</p><p>In this paper, the authors present a brief review of federal policies relative to the production of physicians and other health professionals. It is hoped that one can better understand the current situation and more effectively plan the future if past developments are included. This should lead to a comprehensive analysis from a common perspective. The involvement of the Carnegie Commission (Carnegie Council) is also included for the same reasons.</p><p>All analyses lead to the current situation and the authors' position that there is an impending physician surplus. The central problem has shifted from physician supply to the problem of physician maldistribution, both geographically and by specialty.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 317-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-2281(80)80009-9\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165228180800099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165228180800099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生是否即将过剩?作者的立场是,即将出现盈余。卫生规划人员必须认识到这种可能性。联邦政府作为卫生政策指导方针的主要作者之一,目前正在对盈余问题作出反应。但联邦政府的反应有时可能过于迅速、过于激烈,不符合那些必须保持先前投资的人的最佳利益。因此,与健康相关的教育机构的支持者和那些负责项目实施的人都必须努力定义并达成对情况的共同理解。政策制定和规划活动必须是强调参与的协作努力。在这篇论文中,作者提出了一个简短的审查联邦政策有关生产的医生和其他卫生专业人员。如果把过去的发展包括在内,希望人们能更好地了解现状,更有效地规划未来。这应导致从共同的角度进行全面分析。卡耐基委员会(卡耐基理事会)的参与也是出于同样的原因。所有的分析都导致了目前的情况和作者的立场,即即将出现医生过剩。中心问题已经从医生供应转移到医生分布不均的问题,包括地域和专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of new medical schools and the issues of increasing enrollment

Is there an impending physician surplus? The authors' position is that there is an impending surplus. Health planners must be cognizant of this eventuality. The federal government as one of the major authors of health policy guidelines is currently reacting to the surplus question. But federal reaction can at times be too swift, too dramatic, and not in the best interests of those who must maintain previous investments. Therefore, both the supporters of health-related educational institutions and those who are responsible for program implementation must attempt to define and reach a common understanding of the situation. Policy development and planning activities must be collaborative efforts that emphasize involvement.

In this paper, the authors present a brief review of federal policies relative to the production of physicians and other health professionals. It is hoped that one can better understand the current situation and more effectively plan the future if past developments are included. This should lead to a comprehensive analysis from a common perspective. The involvement of the Carnegie Commission (Carnegie Council) is also included for the same reasons.

All analyses lead to the current situation and the authors' position that there is an impending physician surplus. The central problem has shifted from physician supply to the problem of physician maldistribution, both geographically and by specialty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信