全球竞争:日本跨国公司如何在印度和中国匹配目标和战略

Jaideep Anand , Andrew Delios
{"title":"全球竞争:日本跨国公司如何在印度和中国匹配目标和战略","authors":"Jaideep Anand ,&nbsp;Andrew Delios","doi":"10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90040-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Japanese MNCs have established strong investment positions in the US, Europe and Asia. China has been a major recipient of Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI), while investment in India has grown much more slowly. We argue that the differences extend much beyond the levels of investment—Japanese involvement in India and China is qualitatively different. Japanese FDI in China was motivated by access to location-specific productive resources, and it involved a high degree of technology, management skills and organizational knowledge transfer. The Japanese subsidiaries in China were integrated with the network of international subsidiaries as a part of the MNC's global strategy. Japanese FDI in India, however, was motivated by the desire to access local markets. It involved less transfer of technology and management skills, and Japanese subsidiaries in India operated independently as part of a multi-domestic strategy. We conclude that foreign entrants to the region should be aware and able to respond to the unique advantages of each host country and to the different strategies and capabilities of the subsidiaries of Japanese MNCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":85674,"journal":{"name":"The Columbia journal of world business","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 50-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90040-X","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing globally: How Japanese MNCs have matched goals and strategies in India and China\",\"authors\":\"Jaideep Anand ,&nbsp;Andrew Delios\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90040-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Japanese MNCs have established strong investment positions in the US, Europe and Asia. China has been a major recipient of Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI), while investment in India has grown much more slowly. We argue that the differences extend much beyond the levels of investment—Japanese involvement in India and China is qualitatively different. Japanese FDI in China was motivated by access to location-specific productive resources, and it involved a high degree of technology, management skills and organizational knowledge transfer. The Japanese subsidiaries in China were integrated with the network of international subsidiaries as a part of the MNC's global strategy. Japanese FDI in India, however, was motivated by the desire to access local markets. It involved less transfer of technology and management skills, and Japanese subsidiaries in India operated independently as part of a multi-domestic strategy. We conclude that foreign entrants to the region should be aware and able to respond to the unique advantages of each host country and to the different strategies and capabilities of the subsidiaries of Japanese MNCs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Columbia journal of world business\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 50-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90040-X\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Columbia journal of world business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002254289690040X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Columbia journal of world business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002254289690040X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

日本跨国公司已在美国、欧洲和亚洲建立了强大的投资地位。中国一直是日本外国直接投资(FDI)的主要接受国,而印度的投资增长要慢得多。我们认为,这种差异远远超出了投资水平——日本在印度和中国的投资存在质的差异。日本在华直接投资的动机是获得特定地点的生产资源,它涉及高度的技术、管理技能和组织知识转移。作为跨国公司全球战略的一部分,日本在华子公司与国际子公司网络相结合。然而,日本在印度的外国直接投资是出于进入当地市场的愿望。它涉及较少的技术和管理技能转让,日本在印度的子公司作为多国国内战略的一部分独立经营。我们的结论是,进入该地区的外国企业应该意识到并能够对每个东道国的独特优势以及日本跨国公司子公司的不同战略和能力做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competing globally: How Japanese MNCs have matched goals and strategies in India and China

Japanese MNCs have established strong investment positions in the US, Europe and Asia. China has been a major recipient of Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI), while investment in India has grown much more slowly. We argue that the differences extend much beyond the levels of investment—Japanese involvement in India and China is qualitatively different. Japanese FDI in China was motivated by access to location-specific productive resources, and it involved a high degree of technology, management skills and organizational knowledge transfer. The Japanese subsidiaries in China were integrated with the network of international subsidiaries as a part of the MNC's global strategy. Japanese FDI in India, however, was motivated by the desire to access local markets. It involved less transfer of technology and management skills, and Japanese subsidiaries in India operated independently as part of a multi-domestic strategy. We conclude that foreign entrants to the region should be aware and able to respond to the unique advantages of each host country and to the different strategies and capabilities of the subsidiaries of Japanese MNCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信