深度学习策略:情境模型及其问卷的验证

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ernesto Panadero , Jesús Alonso-Tapia , Daniel García-Pérez , Juan Fraile , José Manuel Sánchez Galán , Rodrigo Pardo
{"title":"深度学习策略:情境模型及其问卷的验证","authors":"Ernesto Panadero ,&nbsp;Jesús Alonso-Tapia ,&nbsp;Daniel García-Pérez ,&nbsp;Juan Fraile ,&nbsp;José Manuel Sánchez Galán ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Pardo","doi":"10.1016/j.psicod.2020.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measuring self-regulated learning is crucial to improve our educational interventions. Self-report has been the major data collection method and a number of questionnaires exist. Importantly, the vast majority of the questionnaires are constructed from general theoretical models. Our aim was to develop a model and its questionnaire –i.e. <em>Deep Learning Strategies questionnaire</em>- to investigate how students regulate their learning strategies in more realistic learning situations. Four scales were created: (1) <em>Basic learning self-regulation strategies</em>; (2) <em>Visual elaboration and summarizing strategies</em>; (3) <em>Deep information processing strategies</em>; and (4) <em>Social learning self-regulation strategies.</em> A total of 601 higher education students formed the sample. We analyzed, first, the internal validity of the questionnaire. Three structural models were tested: (M1) mono-factor; (M2) scales correlate among them freely, and (M3) the scales are indicators of a general construct. The latter model showed a slight better fit. Additionally, a path analysis was carried out to study the degree in which the use of the <em>Deep learning strategies</em> depends on personal factors and is associated to performance. It was found that the use depends directly and positively on <em>Learning goal orientation,</em> on the self-messages defining the <em>Self-regulation style of emotion and motivation focused on learning</em>, and on <em>Effort.</em> Besides, these two last variables convey the effect of <em>Self-efficacy</em> that, at the same time, affects <em>Effort</em>. Academic performance depends positively on <em>Effort</em> but negatively to the use of <em>Deep learning strategies</em>. It is hypothesized this negative relationship is due to the method of measurement of academic performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46733,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicodidactica","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 10-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estrategias de aprendizaje profundas: Validación de un modelo situacional y su cuestionario\",\"authors\":\"Ernesto Panadero ,&nbsp;Jesús Alonso-Tapia ,&nbsp;Daniel García-Pérez ,&nbsp;Juan Fraile ,&nbsp;José Manuel Sánchez Galán ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Pardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psicod.2020.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Measuring self-regulated learning is crucial to improve our educational interventions. Self-report has been the major data collection method and a number of questionnaires exist. Importantly, the vast majority of the questionnaires are constructed from general theoretical models. Our aim was to develop a model and its questionnaire –i.e. <em>Deep Learning Strategies questionnaire</em>- to investigate how students regulate their learning strategies in more realistic learning situations. Four scales were created: (1) <em>Basic learning self-regulation strategies</em>; (2) <em>Visual elaboration and summarizing strategies</em>; (3) <em>Deep information processing strategies</em>; and (4) <em>Social learning self-regulation strategies.</em> A total of 601 higher education students formed the sample. We analyzed, first, the internal validity of the questionnaire. Three structural models were tested: (M1) mono-factor; (M2) scales correlate among them freely, and (M3) the scales are indicators of a general construct. The latter model showed a slight better fit. Additionally, a path analysis was carried out to study the degree in which the use of the <em>Deep learning strategies</em> depends on personal factors and is associated to performance. It was found that the use depends directly and positively on <em>Learning goal orientation,</em> on the self-messages defining the <em>Self-regulation style of emotion and motivation focused on learning</em>, and on <em>Effort.</em> Besides, these two last variables convey the effect of <em>Self-efficacy</em> that, at the same time, affects <em>Effort</em>. Academic performance depends positively on <em>Effort</em> but negatively to the use of <em>Deep learning strategies</em>. It is hypothesized this negative relationship is due to the method of measurement of academic performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Psicodidactica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103420300411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicodidactica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103420300411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

衡量自我调节学习对改善我们的教育干预至关重要。自我报告一直是主要的数据收集方法,存在一些问卷调查。重要的是,绝大多数问卷都是基于一般理论模型构建的。我们的目标是开发一个模型和它的问卷。深度学习策略问卷-调查学生如何在更现实的学习情况下调节他们的学习策略。创建了四个量表:(1)基本学习自我调节策略;(2)视觉化阐述和总结策略;(3)深度信息处理策略;(4)社会学习自我调节策略。共有601名高等教育学生构成了样本。我们首先分析了问卷的内部效度。检验三种结构模型:(M1)单因素模型;(M2)量表之间自由关联,(M3)量表是一般结构的指标。后一种模型的拟合程度稍好一些。此外,还进行了路径分析,以研究深度学习策略的使用取决于个人因素和与性能相关的程度。研究发现,学习目标取向、自我信息对学习动机和情绪自我调节风格的定义以及努力程度都有直接和正向的影响。此外,后两个变量传达了自我效能感的影响,同时影响努力。学习成绩与努力呈正相关,但与深度学习策略的使用呈负相关。据推测,这种负相关关系是由于学习成绩的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estrategias de aprendizaje profundas: Validación de un modelo situacional y su cuestionario

Measuring self-regulated learning is crucial to improve our educational interventions. Self-report has been the major data collection method and a number of questionnaires exist. Importantly, the vast majority of the questionnaires are constructed from general theoretical models. Our aim was to develop a model and its questionnaire –i.e. Deep Learning Strategies questionnaire- to investigate how students regulate their learning strategies in more realistic learning situations. Four scales were created: (1) Basic learning self-regulation strategies; (2) Visual elaboration and summarizing strategies; (3) Deep information processing strategies; and (4) Social learning self-regulation strategies. A total of 601 higher education students formed the sample. We analyzed, first, the internal validity of the questionnaire. Three structural models were tested: (M1) mono-factor; (M2) scales correlate among them freely, and (M3) the scales are indicators of a general construct. The latter model showed a slight better fit. Additionally, a path analysis was carried out to study the degree in which the use of the Deep learning strategies depends on personal factors and is associated to performance. It was found that the use depends directly and positively on Learning goal orientation, on the self-messages defining the Self-regulation style of emotion and motivation focused on learning, and on Effort. Besides, these two last variables convey the effect of Self-efficacy that, at the same time, affects Effort. Academic performance depends positively on Effort but negatively to the use of Deep learning strategies. It is hypothesized this negative relationship is due to the method of measurement of academic performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信