美国以研究为重点的非传统博士会计项目:现状更新

Q1 Social Sciences
Margaret E. Knight , Douglas M. Boyle , John L. Eckroth , Dana R. Hermanson
{"title":"美国以研究为重点的非传统博士会计项目:现状更新","authors":"Margaret E. Knight ,&nbsp;Douglas M. Boyle ,&nbsp;John L. Eckroth ,&nbsp;Dana R. Hermanson","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents current information about U.S. research-focused nontraditional doctoral accounting programs, including overarching program issues, program specifics, and accomplishments of program graduates. Based on online information regarding 19 programs, a survey of 15 program directors, and data collection regarding a sample of program graduates, the findings suggest (a) rapid growth in this premium-priced, typically three-year program market, with 14 new programs since 2013; (b) a strong academic and/or applied research orientation in these programs; (c) challenges related to program cost, faculty workload, and competing demands for student time (that can increase program length); (d) over 100 students currently enrolled in these programs who are focused on academic accounting careers; (e) two different models of offering accounting content (dissertation-only model versus a more comprehensive model with accounting courses and often an accounting concentration); (f) a mix of internal and external program faculty and frequent use of overload compensation for faculty; and (g) evidence that many graduates (who typically are CPAs with prior teaching experience) are achieving success in securing academic positions at institutions apparently with a balanced focus on teaching and research, being promoted, and publishing in notable academic journals. We hope that this analysis is helpful to prospective students, those managing or teaching in nontraditional doctoral accounting programs, and those hiring or considering hiring graduates of these programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. research-focused nontraditional doctoral accounting programs: A status update\",\"authors\":\"Margaret E. Knight ,&nbsp;Douglas M. Boyle ,&nbsp;John L. Eckroth ,&nbsp;Dana R. Hermanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents current information about U.S. research-focused nontraditional doctoral accounting programs, including overarching program issues, program specifics, and accomplishments of program graduates. Based on online information regarding 19 programs, a survey of 15 program directors, and data collection regarding a sample of program graduates, the findings suggest (a) rapid growth in this premium-priced, typically three-year program market, with 14 new programs since 2013; (b) a strong academic and/or applied research orientation in these programs; (c) challenges related to program cost, faculty workload, and competing demands for student time (that can increase program length); (d) over 100 students currently enrolled in these programs who are focused on academic accounting careers; (e) two different models of offering accounting content (dissertation-only model versus a more comprehensive model with accounting courses and often an accounting concentration); (f) a mix of internal and external program faculty and frequent use of overload compensation for faculty; and (g) evidence that many graduates (who typically are CPAs with prior teaching experience) are achieving success in securing academic positions at institutions apparently with a balanced focus on teaching and research, being promoted, and publishing in notable academic journals. We hope that this analysis is helpful to prospective students, those managing or teaching in nontraditional doctoral accounting programs, and those hiring or considering hiring graduates of these programs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究介绍了美国以研究为重点的非传统博士会计项目的最新信息,包括总体项目问题、项目细节和项目毕业生的成就。基于19个项目的在线信息、对15名项目主管的调查以及对项目毕业生样本的数据收集,研究结果表明:(a)这个溢价的、通常为期三年的项目市场快速增长,自2013年以来新增了14个项目;(b)在这些项目中有很强的学术和/或应用研究方向;(c)与项目成本、教师工作量和对学生时间的竞争需求相关的挑战(这可能会增加项目长度);(d)目前有超过100名学生就读于这些课程,他们专注于学术会计职业;(e)提供会计内容的两种不同模式(只提供论文的模式与提供会计课程的更全面的模式,通常以会计为重点);(f)内部和外部项目教师混合使用,并经常对教师使用超负荷补偿;(g)有证据表明,许多毕业生(通常是有教学经验的注册会计师)成功地在教学和研究平衡的机构中获得学术职位,得到晋升,并在著名的学术期刊上发表文章。我们希望这一分析对未来的学生,那些管理或教学非传统博士会计项目的人,以及那些雇用或考虑雇用这些项目的毕业生的人有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
U.S. research-focused nontraditional doctoral accounting programs: A status update

This study presents current information about U.S. research-focused nontraditional doctoral accounting programs, including overarching program issues, program specifics, and accomplishments of program graduates. Based on online information regarding 19 programs, a survey of 15 program directors, and data collection regarding a sample of program graduates, the findings suggest (a) rapid growth in this premium-priced, typically three-year program market, with 14 new programs since 2013; (b) a strong academic and/or applied research orientation in these programs; (c) challenges related to program cost, faculty workload, and competing demands for student time (that can increase program length); (d) over 100 students currently enrolled in these programs who are focused on academic accounting careers; (e) two different models of offering accounting content (dissertation-only model versus a more comprehensive model with accounting courses and often an accounting concentration); (f) a mix of internal and external program faculty and frequent use of overload compensation for faculty; and (g) evidence that many graduates (who typically are CPAs with prior teaching experience) are achieving success in securing academic positions at institutions apparently with a balanced focus on teaching and research, being promoted, and publishing in notable academic journals. We hope that this analysis is helpful to prospective students, those managing or teaching in nontraditional doctoral accounting programs, and those hiring or considering hiring graduates of these programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信