M. Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, E. Delgado Silveira, C. Pérez Menéndez-Conde, T. Bermejo Vicedo
{"title":"创伤患者手工处方与电子处方的错误分析","authors":"M. Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, E. Delgado Silveira, C. Pérez Menéndez-Conde, T. Bermejo Vicedo","doi":"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To detect, quantify, and compare the medication error produced with manual versus electronically assisted prescription systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive, observational, prospective study in two traumatology hospitalisation units; one with manual prescriptions and the other with electronically assisted prescriptions. Prescription errors were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analysed 1536 lines of treatment (393 treatment forms) from 164 patients. With manual prescriptions, we detected errors in 19.54% of cases, compared to 9.4% in electronically assisted prescriptions. Omission errors were significantly lower with electronically assisted prescriptions, especially with drugs that act upon the central nervous system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prescription error has decreased by 53% since computerising the prescription process. This is particularly useful for omission errors, as prescription is more complete. The decrease in error regarding drugs that act on the central nervous system stands out.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 135-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.05.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Errors in Manual Versus Electronic Prescriptions in Trauma Patients\",\"authors\":\"M. Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, E. Delgado Silveira, C. Pérez Menéndez-Conde, T. Bermejo Vicedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farmae.2010.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To detect, quantify, and compare the medication error produced with manual versus electronically assisted prescription systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive, observational, prospective study in two traumatology hospitalisation units; one with manual prescriptions and the other with electronically assisted prescriptions. Prescription errors were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analysed 1536 lines of treatment (393 treatment forms) from 164 patients. With manual prescriptions, we detected errors in 19.54% of cases, compared to 9.4% in electronically assisted prescriptions. Omission errors were significantly lower with electronically assisted prescriptions, especially with drugs that act upon the central nervous system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prescription error has decreased by 53% since computerising the prescription process. This is particularly useful for omission errors, as prescription is more complete. The decrease in error regarding drugs that act on the central nervous system stands out.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 135-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.farmae.2010.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of Errors in Manual Versus Electronic Prescriptions in Trauma Patients
Objective
To detect, quantify, and compare the medication error produced with manual versus electronically assisted prescription systems.
Methods
A descriptive, observational, prospective study in two traumatology hospitalisation units; one with manual prescriptions and the other with electronically assisted prescriptions. Prescription errors were determined.
Results
We analysed 1536 lines of treatment (393 treatment forms) from 164 patients. With manual prescriptions, we detected errors in 19.54% of cases, compared to 9.4% in electronically assisted prescriptions. Omission errors were significantly lower with electronically assisted prescriptions, especially with drugs that act upon the central nervous system.
Conclusions
Prescription error has decreased by 53% since computerising the prescription process. This is particularly useful for omission errors, as prescription is more complete. The decrease in error regarding drugs that act on the central nervous system stands out.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
