互联网与现场:评估政府文件书目指导

Jeffrey M. Wilhite
{"title":"互联网与现场:评估政府文件书目指导","authors":"Jeffrey M. Wilhite","doi":"10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The issue of live bibliographic instruction (BI) versus electronic BI is a matter many libraries are facing as more technology becomes available to afford such an option. At the University of Oklahoma Government Documents Collection, a study was administered in March 2001 to determine the relative advantages between these two teaching techniques. Using three groups (live, Internet, and control), a pre- and posttest/evaluation were utilized to produce statistical results. In the end, both the live and Internet groups' posttests showed statistical significance when compared to the control group but showed no statistical significance when compared to each other. The evaluation and comment section of the posttest were enlightening, as live instruction was preferred over the Internet instruction in most instances. The final result of the study showed no statistical significance between the posttests of the live group and the Internet group, but the subjects preferred live government documents BI to the Internet version. This is important to note as more emphasis is being placed on the possibility of electronic BI for the future of library instruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 561-574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.002","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internet versus live: Assessment of government documents bibliographic instruction\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Wilhite\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The issue of live bibliographic instruction (BI) versus electronic BI is a matter many libraries are facing as more technology becomes available to afford such an option. At the University of Oklahoma Government Documents Collection, a study was administered in March 2001 to determine the relative advantages between these two teaching techniques. Using three groups (live, Internet, and control), a pre- and posttest/evaluation were utilized to produce statistical results. In the end, both the live and Internet groups' posttests showed statistical significance when compared to the control group but showed no statistical significance when compared to each other. The evaluation and comment section of the posttest were enlightening, as live instruction was preferred over the Internet instruction in most instances. The final result of the study showed no statistical significance between the posttests of the live group and the Internet group, but the subjects preferred live government documents BI to the Internet version. This is important to note as more emphasis is being placed on the possibility of electronic BI for the future of library instruction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 561-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352023704000693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of government information : an international review of policy, issues and resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352023704000693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

实时书目教学(BI)与电子BI的问题是许多图书馆面临的一个问题,因为越来越多的技术可以提供这种选择。2001年3月,俄克拉荷马大学政府文件收集中心进行了一项研究,以确定这两种教学方法之间的相对优势。采用三组(现场、网络和对照),采用前后测试/评估产生统计结果。最后,直播组和网络组的后测结果与对照组相比均有统计学意义,但与对照组相比无统计学意义。后测的评价和评论部分很有启发性,因为在大多数情况下,现场教学比网络教学更受欢迎。研究的最终结果显示,直播组和互联网组的后测结果没有统计学意义,但与互联网版本相比,受试者更喜欢政府文件BI直播。这一点值得注意,因为图书馆教学的未来越来越强调电子商务智能的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internet versus live: Assessment of government documents bibliographic instruction

The issue of live bibliographic instruction (BI) versus electronic BI is a matter many libraries are facing as more technology becomes available to afford such an option. At the University of Oklahoma Government Documents Collection, a study was administered in March 2001 to determine the relative advantages between these two teaching techniques. Using three groups (live, Internet, and control), a pre- and posttest/evaluation were utilized to produce statistical results. In the end, both the live and Internet groups' posttests showed statistical significance when compared to the control group but showed no statistical significance when compared to each other. The evaluation and comment section of the posttest were enlightening, as live instruction was preferred over the Internet instruction in most instances. The final result of the study showed no statistical significance between the posttests of the live group and the Internet group, but the subjects preferred live government documents BI to the Internet version. This is important to note as more emphasis is being placed on the possibility of electronic BI for the future of library instruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信