陶瓷牙种植体和钛牙种植体在锥形束计算机断层扫描上产生的金属伪影的比较评估

Emma K. Warren BS , Anusha Vaddi MDS , Aditya Tadinada MDS
{"title":"陶瓷牙种植体和钛牙种植体在锥形束计算机断层扫描上产生的金属伪影的比较评估","authors":"Emma K. Warren BS ,&nbsp;Anusha Vaddi MDS ,&nbsp;Aditya Tadinada MDS","doi":"10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dental implants are becoming the treatment of choice for restoring edentulous sites. Dental implants are typically made of a titanium alloy, and this produces a metallic artifact that obscures adjacent anatomy when imaged using x-radiation, specifically on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans. This artifact makes it challenging to evaluate peri-implant bone levels and any associated pathology. It was hypothesized that the introduction of ceramic implants would help in overcoming this challenge due to the nature and composition of the ceramic. The objective of this study was to compare the metallic artifact produced by ceramic and titanium dental implants when imaged with CBCT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dental implants were placed in the edentulous sites of 2 dry human skulls, and CBCT scans with a standard 360° acquisition and a low-dose 180° acquisition were obtained. The metallic artifact generated by the implants was measured quantitatively using pixel intensity values and qualitatively using a modified Likert scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Average pixel intensity values, by gnathic region, ranged from 123.5 through 507 for titanium implants and 500 through 1,088.5 for ceramic implants. Qualitative analysis showed that ceramic implants produced more metallic artifact than titanium implants. Intraoperator and interoperator reliabilities assessed using Cronbach α showed consistency for both qualitative and quantitative analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ceramic dental implants produced significantly more metallic artifact when imaged on CBCT scans than titanium implants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73530,"journal":{"name":"JADA foundational science","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X22000032/pdfft?md5=ce0a0ae2a4df6351805076ef6948aadb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772414X22000032-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative evaluation of the metallic artifact generated by a ceramic dental implant and a titanium dental implant imaged on cone-beam computed tomographic scans\",\"authors\":\"Emma K. Warren BS ,&nbsp;Anusha Vaddi MDS ,&nbsp;Aditya Tadinada MDS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dental implants are becoming the treatment of choice for restoring edentulous sites. Dental implants are typically made of a titanium alloy, and this produces a metallic artifact that obscures adjacent anatomy when imaged using x-radiation, specifically on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans. This artifact makes it challenging to evaluate peri-implant bone levels and any associated pathology. It was hypothesized that the introduction of ceramic implants would help in overcoming this challenge due to the nature and composition of the ceramic. The objective of this study was to compare the metallic artifact produced by ceramic and titanium dental implants when imaged with CBCT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dental implants were placed in the edentulous sites of 2 dry human skulls, and CBCT scans with a standard 360° acquisition and a low-dose 180° acquisition were obtained. The metallic artifact generated by the implants was measured quantitatively using pixel intensity values and qualitatively using a modified Likert scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Average pixel intensity values, by gnathic region, ranged from 123.5 through 507 for titanium implants and 500 through 1,088.5 for ceramic implants. Qualitative analysis showed that ceramic implants produced more metallic artifact than titanium implants. Intraoperator and interoperator reliabilities assessed using Cronbach α showed consistency for both qualitative and quantitative analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ceramic dental implants produced significantly more metallic artifact when imaged on CBCT scans than titanium implants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JADA foundational science\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X22000032/pdfft?md5=ce0a0ae2a4df6351805076ef6948aadb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772414X22000032-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JADA foundational science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X22000032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JADA foundational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X22000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景牙种植体正在成为修复无牙部位的首选治疗方法。牙科植入物通常由钛合金制成,当使用x射线成像时,特别是在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描时,会产生金属伪影,模糊邻近的解剖结构。这使得评估种植体周围骨水平和任何相关病理变得具有挑战性。据推测,由于陶瓷的性质和组成,引入陶瓷植入物将有助于克服这一挑战。本研究的目的是比较陶瓷种植体和钛种植体在CBCT成像时产生的金属伪影。方法将牙种植体放置于2个干颅骨无牙部位,进行标准360°采集和低剂量180°采集的CBCT扫描。由植入物产生的金属伪影使用像素强度值进行定量测量,并使用改进的李克特量表进行定性测量。结果钛种植体的平均像素强度值为123.5 ~ 507,陶瓷种植体的平均像素强度值为500 ~ 1088.5。定性分析表明,陶瓷种植体比钛种植体产生更多的金属伪影。使用Cronbach α评估的操作者内部和操作者之间的可靠性在定性和定量分析中均显示出一致性。结论陶瓷种植体在CBCT上产生的金属伪影明显高于钛种植体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative evaluation of the metallic artifact generated by a ceramic dental implant and a titanium dental implant imaged on cone-beam computed tomographic scans

Background

Dental implants are becoming the treatment of choice for restoring edentulous sites. Dental implants are typically made of a titanium alloy, and this produces a metallic artifact that obscures adjacent anatomy when imaged using x-radiation, specifically on cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans. This artifact makes it challenging to evaluate peri-implant bone levels and any associated pathology. It was hypothesized that the introduction of ceramic implants would help in overcoming this challenge due to the nature and composition of the ceramic. The objective of this study was to compare the metallic artifact produced by ceramic and titanium dental implants when imaged with CBCT.

Methods

Dental implants were placed in the edentulous sites of 2 dry human skulls, and CBCT scans with a standard 360° acquisition and a low-dose 180° acquisition were obtained. The metallic artifact generated by the implants was measured quantitatively using pixel intensity values and qualitatively using a modified Likert scale.

Results

Average pixel intensity values, by gnathic region, ranged from 123.5 through 507 for titanium implants and 500 through 1,088.5 for ceramic implants. Qualitative analysis showed that ceramic implants produced more metallic artifact than titanium implants. Intraoperator and interoperator reliabilities assessed using Cronbach α showed consistency for both qualitative and quantitative analyses.

Conclusion

Ceramic dental implants produced significantly more metallic artifact when imaged on CBCT scans than titanium implants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JADA foundational science
JADA foundational science Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信