胸部X光片上检测胸腔和胸腔积液的深度学习:计算机断层扫描的验证、对住院医生阅读时间的影响以及患者间的一致性。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000746
Ali Tejani, Thomas Dowling, Sreeja Sanampudi, Rana Yazdani, Arzu Canan, Elona Malja, Yin Xi, Suhny Abbara, Ron M Peshock, Fernando U Kay
{"title":"胸部X光片上检测胸腔和胸腔积液的深度学习:计算机断层扫描的验证、对住院医生阅读时间的影响以及患者间的一致性。","authors":"Ali Tejani, Thomas Dowling, Sreeja Sanampudi, Rana Yazdani, Arzu Canan, Elona Malja, Yin Xi, Suhny Abbara, Ron M Peshock, Fernando U Kay","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting pleural pathology on chest radiographs (CXRs) using computed tomography as ground truth.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective study of subjects undergoing CXR in various clinical settings. Computed tomography obtained within 24 hours of the CXR was used to volumetrically quantify pleural effusions (PEfs) and pneumothoraxes (Ptxs). CXR was evaluated by AI software (INSIGHT CXR; Lunit) and by 3 second-year radiology residents, followed by AI-assisted reassessment after a 3-month washout period. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) to assess AI versus residents' performance and mixed-model analyses to investigate differences in reading time and interreader concordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 96 control subjects, 165 with PEf, and 101 with Ptx. AI-AUROC was noninferior to aggregate resident-AUROC for PEf (0.82 vs 0.86, P < 0.001) and Ptx (0.80 vs 0.84, P = 0.001) detection. AI-assisted resident-AUROC was higher but not significantly different from the baseline. AI-assisted reading time was reduced by 49% (157 vs 80 s per case, P = 0.009), and Fleiss kappa for Ptx detection increased from 0.70 to 0.78 ( P = 0.003). AI decreased detection error for PEf (odds ratio = 0.74, P = 0.024) and Ptx (odds ratio = 0.39, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current AI technology for the detection of PEf and Ptx on CXR was noninferior to second-year resident performance and could help decrease reading time and detection error.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning for Detection of Pneumothorax and Pleural Effusion on Chest Radiographs: Validation Against Computed Tomography, Impact on Resident Reading Time, and Interreader Concordance.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Tejani, Thomas Dowling, Sreeja Sanampudi, Rana Yazdani, Arzu Canan, Elona Malja, Yin Xi, Suhny Abbara, Ron M Peshock, Fernando U Kay\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting pleural pathology on chest radiographs (CXRs) using computed tomography as ground truth.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective study of subjects undergoing CXR in various clinical settings. Computed tomography obtained within 24 hours of the CXR was used to volumetrically quantify pleural effusions (PEfs) and pneumothoraxes (Ptxs). CXR was evaluated by AI software (INSIGHT CXR; Lunit) and by 3 second-year radiology residents, followed by AI-assisted reassessment after a 3-month washout period. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) to assess AI versus residents' performance and mixed-model analyses to investigate differences in reading time and interreader concordance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 96 control subjects, 165 with PEf, and 101 with Ptx. AI-AUROC was noninferior to aggregate resident-AUROC for PEf (0.82 vs 0.86, P < 0.001) and Ptx (0.80 vs 0.84, P = 0.001) detection. AI-assisted resident-AUROC was higher but not significantly different from the baseline. AI-assisted reading time was reduced by 49% (157 vs 80 s per case, P = 0.009), and Fleiss kappa for Ptx detection increased from 0.70 to 0.78 ( P = 0.003). AI decreased detection error for PEf (odds ratio = 0.74, P = 0.024) and Ptx (odds ratio = 0.39, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current AI technology for the detection of PEf and Ptx on CXR was noninferior to second-year resident performance and could help decrease reading time and detection error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000746\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究人工智能(AI)在以计算机断层扫描为基础的胸部X线片(CXRs)上检测胸膜病理的性能。患者和方法:在各种临床环境中接受CXR的受试者的回顾性研究。在CXR后24小时内获得的计算机断层扫描用于对胸腔积液(PEfs)和胸部气肿(Ptxs)进行体积量化。CXR由人工智能软件(INSIGHT CXR;Lunit)和3名二年级放射学住院医师进行评估,然后在3个月的冲洗期后进行人工智能辅助重新评估。我们使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来评估人工智能与居民的表现,并使用混合模型分析来调查阅读时间和阅读者之间一致性的差异。结果:对照组96例,PEf组165例,Ptx组101例。在PEf(0.82对0.86,P<0.001)和Ptx(0.80对0.84,P=0.001)检测方面,AI-AUROC不劣于聚集的居民AUROC。AI辅助住院患者AUROC较高,但与基线无显著差异。人工智能辅助阅读时间减少了49%(157比80 s,P=0.009),Ptx检测的Fleiss-kappa从0.70增加到0.78(P=0.003)。AI降低了PEf(比值比=0.74,P=0.024)和Ptx(比值比0.39,P<0.001)的检测误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning for Detection of Pneumothorax and Pleural Effusion on Chest Radiographs: Validation Against Computed Tomography, Impact on Resident Reading Time, and Interreader Concordance.

Purpose: To study the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting pleural pathology on chest radiographs (CXRs) using computed tomography as ground truth.

Patients and methods: Retrospective study of subjects undergoing CXR in various clinical settings. Computed tomography obtained within 24 hours of the CXR was used to volumetrically quantify pleural effusions (PEfs) and pneumothoraxes (Ptxs). CXR was evaluated by AI software (INSIGHT CXR; Lunit) and by 3 second-year radiology residents, followed by AI-assisted reassessment after a 3-month washout period. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) to assess AI versus residents' performance and mixed-model analyses to investigate differences in reading time and interreader concordance.

Results: There were 96 control subjects, 165 with PEf, and 101 with Ptx. AI-AUROC was noninferior to aggregate resident-AUROC for PEf (0.82 vs 0.86, P < 0.001) and Ptx (0.80 vs 0.84, P = 0.001) detection. AI-assisted resident-AUROC was higher but not significantly different from the baseline. AI-assisted reading time was reduced by 49% (157 vs 80 s per case, P = 0.009), and Fleiss kappa for Ptx detection increased from 0.70 to 0.78 ( P = 0.003). AI decreased detection error for PEf (odds ratio = 0.74, P = 0.024) and Ptx (odds ratio = 0.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Current AI technology for the detection of PEf and Ptx on CXR was noninferior to second-year resident performance and could help decrease reading time and detection error.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信