{"title":"感染性胰腺坏死病毒(IPN)和其他水生病毒的血清学分类","authors":"B.J. Hill, K. Way","doi":"10.1016/0959-8030(95)00011-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Aquatic birnaviruses infect a large variety of fish, molluscs and crustacea in the freshwater, estuarine and marine environments throughout the world and yet despite this extensive host range and geographical distribution, the vast majority of isolates have been found to be antigenically-related to the original reference serotypes (VR299, Sp and Ab) of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) of salmonids. However, in early studies it was seen that there is a high degree of antigenic diversity amongst isolates with some reacting only relatively weakly with these three traditional serotypes, suggesting that other serotypes may exist. In this review we examine the published studies on the degrees of antigenic relatedness between IPNV isolates and other aquatic birnaviruses and discuss the attempts by various authors to identify and/or define different serotypes. The published data from serum neutralization tests is critically appraised and the factors influencing neutralization results discussed. Details are then presented of our own cross-neutralization study with almost 200 isolates of IPNV and other aquatic birnaviruses using a standardized procedure. On the basis of the limit we set for the maximum degree of difference from a reference serotype for an isolate to belong to that serotype, the isolates we examined could be divided into two distinct serogroups (which do not cross-react), the first containing nine serotypes and the second containing a single serotype. We propose a change from the traditional terminology of the recognised reference serotypes to a new simplified system: Serogroup A containing serotypes A<sub>1</sub> to A<sub>9</sub> (so far), and Serogroup B containing the single serotype B<sub>1</sub> (so far). The use of panels of selected monoclonal antibodies against one or more of these reference serotypes offers the prospect for a simpler method for serotyping new isolates and identifying new serotypes. In limited studies to date, reaction patterns with panels of monoclonal antibodies in immunodot and ELISA tests have, in the main, substantiated the serotype classification scheme achieved by serum neutralization tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92872,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of fish diseases","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 55-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0959-8030(95)00011-9","citationCount":"171","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serological classification of infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN) virus and other aquatic birnaviruses\",\"authors\":\"B.J. Hill, K. Way\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0959-8030(95)00011-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Aquatic birnaviruses infect a large variety of fish, molluscs and crustacea in the freshwater, estuarine and marine environments throughout the world and yet despite this extensive host range and geographical distribution, the vast majority of isolates have been found to be antigenically-related to the original reference serotypes (VR299, Sp and Ab) of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) of salmonids. However, in early studies it was seen that there is a high degree of antigenic diversity amongst isolates with some reacting only relatively weakly with these three traditional serotypes, suggesting that other serotypes may exist. In this review we examine the published studies on the degrees of antigenic relatedness between IPNV isolates and other aquatic birnaviruses and discuss the attempts by various authors to identify and/or define different serotypes. The published data from serum neutralization tests is critically appraised and the factors influencing neutralization results discussed. Details are then presented of our own cross-neutralization study with almost 200 isolates of IPNV and other aquatic birnaviruses using a standardized procedure. On the basis of the limit we set for the maximum degree of difference from a reference serotype for an isolate to belong to that serotype, the isolates we examined could be divided into two distinct serogroups (which do not cross-react), the first containing nine serotypes and the second containing a single serotype. We propose a change from the traditional terminology of the recognised reference serotypes to a new simplified system: Serogroup A containing serotypes A<sub>1</sub> to A<sub>9</sub> (so far), and Serogroup B containing the single serotype B<sub>1</sub> (so far). The use of panels of selected monoclonal antibodies against one or more of these reference serotypes offers the prospect for a simpler method for serotyping new isolates and identifying new serotypes. In limited studies to date, reaction patterns with panels of monoclonal antibodies in immunodot and ELISA tests have, in the main, substantiated the serotype classification scheme achieved by serum neutralization tests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of fish diseases\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0959-8030(95)00011-9\",\"citationCount\":\"171\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of fish diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959803095000119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of fish diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959803095000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Serological classification of infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN) virus and other aquatic birnaviruses
Aquatic birnaviruses infect a large variety of fish, molluscs and crustacea in the freshwater, estuarine and marine environments throughout the world and yet despite this extensive host range and geographical distribution, the vast majority of isolates have been found to be antigenically-related to the original reference serotypes (VR299, Sp and Ab) of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) of salmonids. However, in early studies it was seen that there is a high degree of antigenic diversity amongst isolates with some reacting only relatively weakly with these three traditional serotypes, suggesting that other serotypes may exist. In this review we examine the published studies on the degrees of antigenic relatedness between IPNV isolates and other aquatic birnaviruses and discuss the attempts by various authors to identify and/or define different serotypes. The published data from serum neutralization tests is critically appraised and the factors influencing neutralization results discussed. Details are then presented of our own cross-neutralization study with almost 200 isolates of IPNV and other aquatic birnaviruses using a standardized procedure. On the basis of the limit we set for the maximum degree of difference from a reference serotype for an isolate to belong to that serotype, the isolates we examined could be divided into two distinct serogroups (which do not cross-react), the first containing nine serotypes and the second containing a single serotype. We propose a change from the traditional terminology of the recognised reference serotypes to a new simplified system: Serogroup A containing serotypes A1 to A9 (so far), and Serogroup B containing the single serotype B1 (so far). The use of panels of selected monoclonal antibodies against one or more of these reference serotypes offers the prospect for a simpler method for serotyping new isolates and identifying new serotypes. In limited studies to date, reaction patterns with panels of monoclonal antibodies in immunodot and ELISA tests have, in the main, substantiated the serotype classification scheme achieved by serum neutralization tests.