成人ADHD的语言加工障碍和非典型脑侧偏

T. Sigi Hale , James T. McCracken , James J. McGough , Susan L. Smalley , Joseph M. Phillips , Eran Zaidel
{"title":"成人ADHD的语言加工障碍和非典型脑侧偏","authors":"T. Sigi Hale ,&nbsp;James T. McCracken ,&nbsp;James J. McGough ,&nbsp;Susan L. Smalley ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Phillips ,&nbsp;Eran Zaidel","doi":"10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Introduction: cognitive/behavioral testing, structural imaging, and functional imaging, has demonstrated atypical cerebral asymmetries in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, few studies directly examined the nature of hemispheric specialization and interaction in this population. Methods: the present experiment applied techniques from behavioral laterality research to assess directly left/right brain dynamics in unmedicated adults with ADHD (</span><em>n</em>=21) and controls (<em>n</em><span>=22). We used a lateralized lexical decision task to assess hemispheric differences in word recognition and cross-callosal interhemispheric transfer of linguistic information. Results: analysis of variance indicated that ADHD subjects were impaired relative to controls in identifying words in both hemispheres (</span><em>P</em>=0.001). Furthermore, ADHD subjects exhibited decreased effects for ‘word regularity’ (<em>P</em>=004), enhanced effects of ‘word frequency’ (<em>P</em>=007), and an increased bias for ‘nonword’ responses overall (<em>P</em>=03), as well as during left visual field trials in particular (<em>P</em><span><span>=01). Conclusions: adult subjects with ADHD demonstrated poor linguistic processing. Group differences in sensitivity to semantic and phonological linguistic variables, along with differences in response biases, suggested that ADHD subjects had reduced left hemisphere and enhanced right hemisphere involvement during our task. These findings are relevant to current research investigating ‘endophenotypes’ in ADHD, as laterality indices may prove useful in etiological research, particularly molecular genetic investigations, and highlights the relevance of brain laterality research in </span>clinical psychiatry.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":87465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical neuroscience research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.006","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impaired linguistic processing and atypical brain laterality in adults with ADHD\",\"authors\":\"T. Sigi Hale ,&nbsp;James T. McCracken ,&nbsp;James J. McGough ,&nbsp;Susan L. Smalley ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Phillips ,&nbsp;Eran Zaidel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Introduction: cognitive/behavioral testing, structural imaging, and functional imaging, has demonstrated atypical cerebral asymmetries in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, few studies directly examined the nature of hemispheric specialization and interaction in this population. Methods: the present experiment applied techniques from behavioral laterality research to assess directly left/right brain dynamics in unmedicated adults with ADHD (</span><em>n</em>=21) and controls (<em>n</em><span>=22). We used a lateralized lexical decision task to assess hemispheric differences in word recognition and cross-callosal interhemispheric transfer of linguistic information. Results: analysis of variance indicated that ADHD subjects were impaired relative to controls in identifying words in both hemispheres (</span><em>P</em>=0.001). Furthermore, ADHD subjects exhibited decreased effects for ‘word regularity’ (<em>P</em>=004), enhanced effects of ‘word frequency’ (<em>P</em>=007), and an increased bias for ‘nonword’ responses overall (<em>P</em>=03), as well as during left visual field trials in particular (<em>P</em><span><span>=01). Conclusions: adult subjects with ADHD demonstrated poor linguistic processing. Group differences in sensitivity to semantic and phonological linguistic variables, along with differences in response biases, suggested that ADHD subjects had reduced left hemisphere and enhanced right hemisphere involvement during our task. These findings are relevant to current research investigating ‘endophenotypes’ in ADHD, as laterality indices may prove useful in etiological research, particularly molecular genetic investigations, and highlights the relevance of brain laterality research in </span>clinical psychiatry.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical neuroscience research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.006\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical neuroscience research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566277205000721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566277205000721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

简介:认知/行为测试、结构成像和功能成像已经证明了注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患者的非典型大脑不对称。然而,很少有研究直接检查这一人群的半球专业化和相互作用的性质。方法:本实验应用行为侧性研究的技术直接评估未服药的ADHD成人(n=21)和对照组(n=22)的左右脑动力学。我们使用了一个侧化词汇决策任务来评估单词识别和语言信息的跨胼胝体半球间转移的半球差异。结果:方差分析表明,ADHD受试者在两个脑半球识别单词方面相对于对照组受损(P=0.001)。此外,ADHD受试者在“单词规律性”方面表现出下降的效果(P=004),在“词频”方面表现出增强的效果(P=007),在“非单词”反应方面总体上表现出增加的偏倚(P=03),特别是在左视野试验中(P=01)。结论:成人ADHD受试者表现出较差的语言加工。在语义和语音语言变量敏感性上的组差异,以及反应偏差的差异,表明ADHD受试者在我们的任务中减少了左半球的参与,增强了右半球的参与。这些发现与当前研究ADHD的“内表型”相关,因为偏侧性指数可能在病因学研究,特别是分子遗传学研究中被证明是有用的,并强调了临床精神病学中脑偏侧性研究的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impaired linguistic processing and atypical brain laterality in adults with ADHD

Introduction: cognitive/behavioral testing, structural imaging, and functional imaging, has demonstrated atypical cerebral asymmetries in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, few studies directly examined the nature of hemispheric specialization and interaction in this population. Methods: the present experiment applied techniques from behavioral laterality research to assess directly left/right brain dynamics in unmedicated adults with ADHD (n=21) and controls (n=22). We used a lateralized lexical decision task to assess hemispheric differences in word recognition and cross-callosal interhemispheric transfer of linguistic information. Results: analysis of variance indicated that ADHD subjects were impaired relative to controls in identifying words in both hemispheres (P=0.001). Furthermore, ADHD subjects exhibited decreased effects for ‘word regularity’ (P=004), enhanced effects of ‘word frequency’ (P=007), and an increased bias for ‘nonword’ responses overall (P=03), as well as during left visual field trials in particular (P=01). Conclusions: adult subjects with ADHD demonstrated poor linguistic processing. Group differences in sensitivity to semantic and phonological linguistic variables, along with differences in response biases, suggested that ADHD subjects had reduced left hemisphere and enhanced right hemisphere involvement during our task. These findings are relevant to current research investigating ‘endophenotypes’ in ADHD, as laterality indices may prove useful in etiological research, particularly molecular genetic investigations, and highlights the relevance of brain laterality research in clinical psychiatry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信