C. Mínguez Ojeda, I. Laso García, D. López Curtis, G. Duque Ruiz, M. Mata Alcaraz, M. Santiago González, A. Artiles Medina, M. Hevia Palacios, F. Arias Fúnez, F.J. Burgos Revilla
{"title":"体外碎石作为尿路结石一线治疗方法的当前有效性","authors":"C. Mínguez Ojeda, I. Laso García, D. López Curtis, G. Duque Ruiz, M. Mata Alcaraz, M. Santiago González, A. Artiles Medina, M. Hevia Palacios, F. Arias Fúnez, F.J. Burgos Revilla","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.13; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.15; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.052) and number of waves (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.131; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), number of waves (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.000; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), energy (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.005; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.024, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.571).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 2","pages":"Pages 134-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validez actual de la litotricia extracorpórea como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis\",\"authors\":\"C. Mínguez Ojeda, I. Laso García, D. López Curtis, G. Duque Ruiz, M. Mata Alcaraz, M. Santiago González, A. Artiles Medina, M. Hevia Palacios, F. Arias Fúnez, F.J. Burgos Revilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.13; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.15; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.052) and number of waves (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.131; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), number of waves (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.000; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), energy (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.005; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.024, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.571).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 134-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480623001249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480623001249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validez actual de la litotricia extracorpórea como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones.
Methods
Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.
Results
1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR = 1.13; P = 0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR = 1.15; P = 0.052) and number of waves (P = 0.002; OR = 1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR = 1.131; P = 0.000), number of waves (OR = 1.000; P = 0.000), energy (OR = 1.005; P = 0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (P = 0.024, OR = 1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P = 0.004, OR = 0.571).
Conclusion
Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.
期刊介绍:
Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology.
Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.