人文学科的学习进展:确定威尔士人文学科进展的紧张关系

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Curriculum Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-29 DOI:10.1002/curj.28
Sioned V. Hughes, Kara Makara, David Stacey
{"title":"人文学科的学习进展:确定威尔士人文学科进展的紧张关系","authors":"Sioned V. Hughes, Kara Makara, David Stacey","doi":"10.1002/curj.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores tensions in the articulation of progression in learning across \nthe Humanities disciplines. Informed by our review of research in the Humanities \ndisciplines, international curricula on progression in these areas, and reflections \nfrom professional activity within the newly defined Humanities ‘Area of \nLearning and Experience’ (AoLE) in the new Welsh curriculum, this paper \ndescribes how learning progression in Humanities has been conceptualised within \nthe new curriculum and then delineates and critically reviews four challenges that \nemerged when identifying and describing progression in learning in the new \nHumanities curriculum. Tensions include the relationship between disciplines; \nthe balance between knowledge, skills and values; the differences between \nunderlying models of progression in Humanities; and balancing the complexity of \nlearning with practical considerations for a national curriculum. Underpinned by \nthe Integrity Model of Change, this paper makes a contribution, through \nproviding new insights on broad aspects of learning progression in Humanities \nand highlighting potential benefits and challenges of taking particular decisions \nwithin each of these four tensions. Implications for curriculum planning and \nfuture research are offered, including the fundamental role of professional \nlearning in curriculum development and enactment.","PeriodicalId":46745,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/curj.28","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning progression in the humanities: identifying tensions in articulating progression in humanities in Wales\",\"authors\":\"Sioned V. Hughes, Kara Makara, David Stacey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/curj.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper explores tensions in the articulation of progression in learning across \\nthe Humanities disciplines. Informed by our review of research in the Humanities \\ndisciplines, international curricula on progression in these areas, and reflections \\nfrom professional activity within the newly defined Humanities ‘Area of \\nLearning and Experience’ (AoLE) in the new Welsh curriculum, this paper \\ndescribes how learning progression in Humanities has been conceptualised within \\nthe new curriculum and then delineates and critically reviews four challenges that \\nemerged when identifying and describing progression in learning in the new \\nHumanities curriculum. Tensions include the relationship between disciplines; \\nthe balance between knowledge, skills and values; the differences between \\nunderlying models of progression in Humanities; and balancing the complexity of \\nlearning with practical considerations for a national curriculum. Underpinned by \\nthe Integrity Model of Change, this paper makes a contribution, through \\nproviding new insights on broad aspects of learning progression in Humanities \\nand highlighting potential benefits and challenges of taking particular decisions \\nwithin each of these four tensions. Implications for curriculum planning and \\nfuture research are offered, including the fundamental role of professional \\nlearning in curriculum development and enactment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/curj.28\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在跨人文学科的学习进展的衔接紧张。根据我们对人文学科研究的回顾,这些领域进展的国际课程,以及在新威尔士课程中新定义的人文学科“学习和经验领域”(AoLE)内的专业活动的反思,本文描述了在新课程中如何概念化人文学科的学习进展,然后描述并批判性地回顾了在识别和描述新人文学科课程中学习进展时出现的四个挑战。紧张关系包括学科之间的关系;知识、技能和价值观之间的平衡;人文学科发展的基本模式之间的差异;平衡学习的复杂性和国家课程的实际考虑。在“变化的完整性模型”的支持下,本文做出了贡献,通过提供关于人文学科学习进展的广泛方面的新见解,并强调在这四种紧张关系中做出特定决定的潜在利益和挑战。对课程规划和未来研究的启示,包括专业学习在课程发展和制定中的基本作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning progression in the humanities: identifying tensions in articulating progression in humanities in Wales
The paper explores tensions in the articulation of progression in learning across the Humanities disciplines. Informed by our review of research in the Humanities disciplines, international curricula on progression in these areas, and reflections from professional activity within the newly defined Humanities ‘Area of Learning and Experience’ (AoLE) in the new Welsh curriculum, this paper describes how learning progression in Humanities has been conceptualised within the new curriculum and then delineates and critically reviews four challenges that emerged when identifying and describing progression in learning in the new Humanities curriculum. Tensions include the relationship between disciplines; the balance between knowledge, skills and values; the differences between underlying models of progression in Humanities; and balancing the complexity of learning with practical considerations for a national curriculum. Underpinned by the Integrity Model of Change, this paper makes a contribution, through providing new insights on broad aspects of learning progression in Humanities and highlighting potential benefits and challenges of taking particular decisions within each of these four tensions. Implications for curriculum planning and future research are offered, including the fundamental role of professional learning in curriculum development and enactment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Journal
Curriculum Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信